Terrorism is Degenerating
the Mankind: How to Change the Future?
Dr. Mahboob A.
Khawaja
A "war of religion" is unfolding,
with a view to justifying a global military crusade. In the inner consciousness
of many Americans, the "holy crusade" against Muslims is justified.
While President Obama may uphold freedom of religion, the US inquisitorial social order has
institutionalized patterns of discrimination, prejudice and xenophobia directed
against Muslims.”
(Michel Chossudovsky
“America's Holy Crusade against the Muslim World”,
Global Research, 8/30/2010).
“Terrorism” is a Political
Game of Action vs. Reaction
International politics is a game
of action and reaction. To claim that the 1.2 billion world’s Muslim population
is breeding “terrorism” is factually absurd and false. Ironically, deceptive is the political
calligraphy and dehumanized characterization of the Islamic world that was
under the European colonization for centuries. Were the Europeans not
“terrorists” to invade and occupy the large parts of the Islamic world by
military force and cultural exploitation? What is more alarming in the 21st
century when the corporate world’s hired big affluent minds and news-making
intellect offer fabricated facts of history to keep the masses under constant
fear and red-alerts that American and other Western societies face outrageous
trends of “extremism” and “terrorism” coming from the Islamic societies. In a
rational perspective “terrorism” does not grow out of any particular land or culture
but it is a global historical phenomenon of action vs. reaction game. It was
best explained by British author and producer Adam Curtis (The
Power of Nightmares: The Rise of the Politics of Fear: BBC
documentary challenging the American version of the “War on Terrorism”), spells
out the myth with clarity: “international terrorism is a fantasy
that has been exaggerated and distorted by politicians. It is a dark illusion
that has spread unquestioned through governments around the world, the security
services and the international media.”
Let us be absolutely
clear that the US-led forces including the Europeans were not sent to
Afghanistan or Iraq to defend democracy, freedom, human rights and liberty but
to occupy those nations and exploit their natural resources and in some
instances to test new and invisible weapons on easily available civilian
targets. The mankind all over the planet is the net casualty of this horrible
crime. Who gained most out of the planned miseries, bloodbaths and cruelty to
others? The Western oil companies, Washington-based military-industrial complex
and the weapon manufacturers in the US
and Europe. Chris Floyd (“Darkness
Renewed: Terror as a Tool of Empire,” Atlantic Free Press: 04/1/2009),
puts it in a nutshell:
“It is the policy of the United States government to provoke
violent extremist groups into action. Once they are in play, their responses
can then be used in whatever way the government that provoked them sees fit.
And we also know that these provocations are being used, as a matter of
deliberate policy, to rouse violent groups on the “Af-Pak” front to launch
terrorist attacks.”
Across the globe,
“terrorism” whether it originates in the Western political culture or
reactionary “terrorism” fast growing in the Muslim societies, the problem is
critical and consuming too much time and energies which should be used for the
good of the mankind living in peace not in adversity and continuing warfare. Do the Americans or other allied with
warrior cliché know or have the ability to opt out of the degenerating warfare and
its consequential ripple effects for the future of the mankind? To any rational scholars, it is clear that
often one track delusional leaders jump to unusual situations of conflict but
do not know how to come out of the absurdity of vicious and trivial political
ambitions. This is the framework of the prevalent facts of US led bogus war on
terrorism. Why should common citizens be
victimized by the sadistic ambitions of the few powerful rulers - be they be
military dictators or elected presidents?
More than a
decade later, the war on terrorism with far reaching consequences continues
unabated. Surely, the need is urgent for the people enriched with new ideas and
innovative thinking to take initiatives and strive for change and better
understanding of the encompassing problems which led to inhuman atrocities on
both sides of the aisle. Throughout the Western democratic societies, terrorism
myth is institutionalized across the board. There are large scale violations of
human rights, freedom by intelligence surveillance and police actions via
systematic process to target Muslims as the object of “terrorism.” This term
has no valid legal definition. Could the court judges, police and politicians frame
the solutions for societal peace and harmony?
They are players in the systematic process but not the chief motivators
to articulate any navigational change process.
Can ‘Law and Order’ Change the Human
Thinking?
Since the 9/11, hurriedly passed
terrorism laws have been used to deal with “terrorism” and political
priorities. One track legislative acts do not change human thinking and
behavior. They are written words on paper with dry ink and nothing else. Human
thinking and acts put the law and order construct into reality. When judges, politicians and police
establishments adhere to abstract commands to safeguard the society and comply
with actions, often innocent people get entrapped into a vicious circle of
legal argument and given harsh sentences without any tangible facts of a
case. There are numerous factual
instances throughout North America and UK whereby judges have used the irrational
terrorism acts and punished the accused with harsh sentences not necessarily
justifiable in any civilized nations of the 21st century. On suspicion of “terrorism”, Dr. Dhaffir
Rafel, highly respected international humanitarian work medical doctor from Syracuse, NY who helped
the sick, wounded and displaced children and families in Iraq was jailed
for 22 years on false accusations of laundering charity funds. Meet with Mr. Maher
Arar, the Engineer of Syrian origin and Canadian citizen tortured in Syrian
jail under the direct US-Canada intelligence collaboration. Both countries denied
the knowledge of the Maher Arar’s saga until an independent judge delivered the
guilty verdict. Talk to Marzieh Hashemi
in Colorado, young widow journalist, mom of three small kids was awaken at
gunpoint in early morning by armed police raid wanted house search for income
tax papers. Would you send police armed squad to ask for income tax return forms?
Moazzam Begg, British citizen was wrongfully sent to Guantanmobay suspected of
being ‘enemy combatant’ and tortured for several years and then set free to UK. Now in
February 2014, Begg is reportedly arrested again on suspicion of operating a
terrorist cell to fight against the Syrian dictator Bashar Al-Assad. Paul
J. Balles (“The World Sickest Warrior State” Information
Clearing House: 03/8/2010) points out the prevalent tragic outcomes of the
wars:
“We
have now reached a stage where our extreme horrors of brutality and cruelty
have exceeded our past records. We no longer have the rationale of moral
righteousness of the earlier wars…. There were no excuses for Abu-Ghraib, but
our interest in that inhuman travesty dried up and blew away. We have little
concern about our violations of human rights in Guantanamo. ….the real horrors – of this war
come with the primitive killer mentality developed in our youth. I’ve now seen
a half dozen documentary
films and read eyewitness accounts that reveal troops or
pilots gloating over the massacres of civilians who just happened to be
available targets.”
Muslims suspected of ‘Terrorism’ Guilty
without a Crime
There are approximately 6000
detainees mostly of the Arab/Muslim origin detained in UK on suspicion
of terrorism according to the media reports. Almost 2000 are said to be in the US jails
since the 9/11 attacks. Informed source
report that 600 detainees have been released secretly by the US authorities and 250 or so mostly
bought by the Bush administration at a cost of approximately $5,000. to
$10,000. or more per head to Afghan warlords are still held at the Guantanomo Bay prison without trial. Across North
America and West Europe, a separate ‘legal system” is developed to imply the
term ‘terrorism’ only to Muslims, explains Glenn
Greenwald (“New York Top Court Highlights the Meaningless Menace
of the Term ‘Terrorism’.” The
Guardian and Information Clearing House: 12/17/2013):
A
fascinating new ruling unwittingly illustrates the separate system of 'justice'
invented for Muslims in the US after 9/11……But that's what has happened in the
post-9/11 era: a whole new system of "justice", with all new rules
designed to ensure convictions and long prison terms, have been invented
exclusively for those facing "terrorism" charges. And since the term
"terrorism" has no discernible meaning other than "acts of
violence committed by Arabs and/or Muslims against westerners", this
illustrates why New York Times editorial page editor Andrew Rosenthal was
exactly right when, under the headline "Liberty and Justice for
non-Muslims", he
wrote: [I]t's rarely acknowledged
that the [9/11] attacks have also led to what's essentially a separate
justice system for Muslims. In this system, the principle of due
process is twisted and selectively applied, if it is applied at all…….It's a
separate system of justice so intrinsically unjust and unfair - designed to
ensure that Muslims accused of "terrorism" have basically no chance
of acquittal - that any trial that proceeds under its warped rules for
non-terrorist defendants must be thrown out in its entirety, said the New York
Court of Appeals. That's extraordinary.
Hold your breath, one such
person has experienced the reality of what Glenn Greenwald has disclosed. Momin
Khawaja, 22 years old young college computer graduate without criminal record was
the first Canadian victim of the “war on terrorism.” Momin Khawaja was
acquitted by the trial judge of “terrorism” in the UK involvement - the focal point of
the case but sentenced to 10.5 years on accusations lacking tangible evidence
except the emails. The higher appeal courts extended the sentence without any
evidence to life and 24 years along with racially biased remarks. If he had contributed
approximately $859. to an Afghan displaced women-children charity fund and
attended one day camp in Pakistan and used a cell phone jammer device readily
available from the store (the prosecution alleged it a ‘bomb making’ device but
could not prove it), how could he be sentenced to a Life and 24 years under
terrorism? What was the so called
“terrorist” crime that he committed and deserved this slow death
punishment? Even the Supreme Court
judges asked the prosecution: “why
should Momin Khawaja be sentenced to a life-24 years when he is not charged
with the crime nor he committed it.” Political irony speaks loud and clear
that judges are appointed by politicians. In early 2005, President George W.
Bush asked the then visiting Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin at his Texas ranch to “fix
Khawaja.” In an age of knowledge and reason, reason lost its place and purpose
to “suspicion” as the code of Law. Internationally well known American
intellectual Paul Craig
Roberts (“What Do We Stand for? Information Clearing House: 18/02/2008), expressed similar concerns:
Do we Americans have any honor, any
humanity, any integrity, any awareness of the crimes our government is
committing in our names? Do we have a moral conscience? …..The killing and occupation continue even though we now
know that the invasions were based on lies and fabricated "evidence."
The entire world knows this. Yet Americans continue to act as if the gratuitous
invasions, the gratuitous killing, and the gratuitous destruction are
justified. There is no end of it in sight. If Americans have any honor, how can
they betray their Founding Fathers, who gave them liberty, by tolerating a
government that claims immunity to law and the Constitution and is erecting a
police state in their midst?
The Need for Rational
Rethinking to Change and Adaptability to the Future
Aggressiveness,
police raids and irrational harsh legal judgments do not articulate cooperation
and respect for human dignity or social harmony and peace in human society but
divide people in hatred, fear and more conflicts. You cannot change a society
with law and order dictum. When a problem is misunderstood, its diagnostic approach
will be wrong. An out of the official box approach to understand the problem is
urgently needed. The major news media corporations in North America and Western Europe are aligned to the establishments and tainted
with biased coverage as they get paid via ads and secret dealings. None of this
is helpful to foster change and societal advancement for a peaceful future. Glenn Greenwald (“The 'War on
Terror' - by Design - Can Never End. The Guardian: 1/4/2013”), shares a foresight in time and place to
make us think hard about the future:
There's no question that this
"war" will continue indefinitely. There is no question that US
actions are the cause of that, the gasoline that fuels the fire. The only
question - and it's becoming less of a question for me all the time - is
whether this endless war is the intended result of US actions or just an
unwanted miscalculation. Why would anyone in the US government or its owners have
any interest in putting an end to this sham bonanza of power and profit called
"the war on terror"?
What is
the cure to raging indifference and cruelty to the interests of the people of
North America, Europe and for that matter to
the whole of the mankind? Looking at the
Nature of Things, the universe
encompasses many challenging opposites: time,
space, sun, moon, gravitational rotation of the earth, fire, water, air, sand,
floods, earthquakes, tsunami, disasters, explosions, wars, destructions,
bombing and all that can be imagined to destroy the mankind and endanger the
continued movement of the splendid, inspiring and harmonious Universe. How is
it that Man - a creation of God cannot co-exist with fellow Man? Is Man by nature a blood thirsty
creature? Perhaps, the invisible forces
of culture and environment and societal indoctrinations frame and shape that
mindset.
Do the American and European politicians and
military strategists think like the common folks who believe in peace, freedom
and liberty? If Thomas Paine, Thomas Jefferson
and Abraham Lincoln were alive, their moral and intellectual souls would have been
disturbed - how George W. Bush, Blair and Obama tortured the innocents at Guantanomo Bay
and Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq.
Informed masses throughout the globe aspire for conflict-free change, peaceful
co-existence and harmony amongst the civilized societies. Rationality and
insanity cannot be combined in the character of one organization or people. Legal
stipulations or court judges or police cannot reform the societal thinking or
develop a new future of collaboration across the globe. But enhanced societal
communication and people of new ideas and ideals on both sides could make
positive contributions to bridge the gaps of suspicion and mistrust through
interactive communications and to move forward for societal trust-building and
mutual co-existence without reactionary terrorism. Every beginning has its end.
There are no Islamic states and no Islamic terrorism challenging America, Canada or any other European nations.
‘Terrorism’ is a political myth crafted for global business and strategic
domination and to incite emotions and mislead all the masses against one
another. No religion teaches hatred and terrorism, but individual humans do it
by their own choice and arrogance. Reflecting a collective consciousness, Islam
and Muslims do not look for animosity for their survival and outreach. America
and West Europeans are using wrong weapons to fight Islam and God. In the 21st
century global community of informed citizens, need is not for perpetuated
animosity against Islam and Muslims but friendship and understanding for unity
in diversity to strengthen the multicultural mosaic. The future generations
must not be entrapped by the vengeful reactionary politics of the post 9/11
decade. Human decency and futuristic priorities would deserve rethinking and
change in policies and behaviors. Be it the politics, courts, judges or police,
they must pursue change and adaptability to an amicable future-making. The
essence of sustainable and peaceful future-building requires mutual cooperation
for continuous learning and understanding (without agreeing or disagreeing-
just knowing each others perspectives), for change and adaptability to the
future-making. Time and emerging opportunities warrant new societal thinking
and approaches, and new visions for change and the future-making. But change
and creativity and new visions will not emerge out of the obsolete, redundant
and failed individualistic absolutism of the few insane and egoistic leaders. Intelligent
and effective leaders offer hope and optimism in situations of adversity and share
proactive vision, and demonstrate flexibility for navigational change when
facts of life warrant a change; and eagerness to learn the art of good communication
and to do the best for the society. Where official know-how and genius are
boxed-in without favorable results or have flunked, people of new vision and
leadership initiatives could produce societal change and better sustainable
outcomes to restore peace and normalcy. Winston Churchill once said: “a pessimist sees difficulty in every
opportunity; an optimist sees opportunity in every difficulty.” Are there any people of REASON open to
listening and learning for the best of human communities across the globe?
|