|
Bismillah hir Rehman nir Raheem
Why Omar Al-Bashir and Why not Bush, Sharonf And Mush????????
Anwar Ul Haque, MD
It is no secret that Israel or Zionists want to steel the Sudanese Oil and hence want to capture Darfur. The Zionist forces are using its main slave international organization i.e. UN to do the dirty job.
UN hires even soldiers from Muslim countries to attack another Islamic country. Who can forget UN organized mass killings of Muslims in Sabrinica at the hands of Serbs. The "Safe Heavens" were turned into
"Deadly Hells"! However we are sure that all victims of Sabrinica have already gone to real heaven while UN Chiefs and Serb mass murderers will definitely go to hell and live there for ever. They will be roasted
again and again.
New skin will generate as soon as the old skin is completely burnt.
ICC Chief Prosecutor Luis Moreno-Ocampo should prosecute the following for their heinous crimes against humanity;
1) Mr. Sharon for killing over 3500 innocent, unarmed women in Shatilla and Sabira camps on September 16th 1982
2) Mr. Sharon for organizing 9/11 and then ordering his white slave Bush to carry out attack on Afghanistan along with massive defamation campaign against Muslims and Islam
3) Mr. Bush for lying repeatedly about weapons of mass destruction and then using this lie for attacking Iraq and killing hundreds of thousands
4) Mr. Bush for restoring heroin supply from Afghanistan which is on full swing under full patronage of Zionist drug mafia to the West where hundreds of thousands are crippled by the deadly heroin.
5) Mr. Bush for creating world's most notorious
6) Mr. Mush for abducting thousands of innocent people, torturing them and killing many innocent people without any trial, for holding sham presidential elections (With full Bush support) and when challenged in the court, for attacking the court and arresting
over 60 judges along with their family members.
7) Mr. Putin for enormous suppression of common people in Russia and his repeatedly terrorist attacks on Chechnya using 9/11 types self created attacks on schools etc killing many innocent children.
I earlier tried to launch case against Mr. Mush in the International court but I found that only Governments can access to such courts but how come Mr. Luis Moreno-Ocampo is filing case against a President. How is he superior to me and who made him superior.
If Luis Moreno-Ocampo has any shame he should prosecute Sharon (Already on death bed waiting to give company to Mr. Mush on their journey straight to hell), Bush and Mush. As all five assemblies passed no confidence against Mr. Mush by voice vote of Go
Musharraf, Go Musharraf, the Pakistani nation will be more than happy if Mush is tried and executed by the International Court of Justice. If it can't do that then it means it is another Zionist organ just like UN.
Dr. Anwar Ul Haque is a Free Lancer writer and does not accept any remuneration for his writings. He has special interest in International Affairs and can be contacted on the following address and phone numbers:
116. St. 49 F 11/3 Islamabad 44000 Phone 03335129849, 2294099
I
Bashir move bold but problematic |
By Paul Reynolds
World affairs correspondent, BBC News website |
The decision by the chief prosecutor of the International Criminal Court to seek the arrest of President Omar al-Bashir of Sudan is a bold human rights intervention, but one that will cause
problems on the diplomatic front.
It is bound to complicate, some will say destroy, attempts to increase the presence of an international peacekeeping force in Darfur and to encourage negotiations on a settlement between the government of Sudan and the rebel groups in Darfur.
But the ICC is independent and is not concerned with diplomacy.
It is concerned with justice. The court believes that, in this case, it is doing exactly what it was set up to do in 2002 - prosecute crimes of genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes.
It does not have to make a calculation and weigh the balance between justice and realpolitik.
Similar arguments were heard when, in 2005, the court issued an arrest warrant for Joseph Kony, the leader of the Lord's Resistance Army in Uganda. That warrant remains unenforced and a peace deal remains unsigned.
Head of state
This is the first time that the prosecutor has made charges against a sitting head of state, breaking new ground in the reduction of national sovereignty rights that have characterised international law in recent years.
The trials of the former Yugoslav president Slobodan Milosevic and of Charles Taylor of Liberia required special decisions by the United Nations.
The chief prosecutor, Luis Moreno-Ocampo, who showed his determination as a prosecutor in Argentina when he acted against former junta leaders for the massacre of civilians, said in his presentation of evidence
that Mr Bashir "committed the crimes of genocide,
crimes against humanity and war crimes in Darfur".
He stated: "The prosecution evidence shows that al-Bashir masterminded and implemented a plan to destroy in substantial part the Fur, Masalit and Zaghawa groups.... His alibi was a 'counterinsurgency'. His intent was genocide".
'Disaster in the making'
However, there has been criticism of the prosecutor's decision from the former US Special Envoy for Sudan, Andrew Natsios. In an article on the website of the Social Science Research Council titled "A disaster in the making", Mr Natsios says: "This indictment may well shut
off the last remaining hope for a peaceful settlement for the country.
"Without a political settlement Sudan may go the way of Somalia, pre-genocide Rwanda, or the Democratic Republic of the Congo: a real potential for widespread atrocities and bloodshed as those in power seek to keep it at any cost because of the alternatives.
An indictment of
Bashir will make it much more difficult for any country or international organisation to help negotiate a political settlement with the Sudanese government."
Security Council mandate
Sudan has not signed up to the ICC but the court has authority to act in this case because the Security Council gave it a mandate to do so, with resolution 1593 in March 2005.
Under that mandate, the court issued arrest warrants in 2007 for two Sudanese citizens.
It alleged that one of them, government minister Ahmed Haroun, organised the Janjaweed militia in Darfur and that the second, a Janjaweed leader known as Ali Kushayb, ordered the murder, torture and mass rape of western Darfur villagers.
Sudan refused to hand them over.
In July 2008, Mr Moreno-Ocampo told the Security Council that Sudan was not co-operating and that he had "compelling evidence" identifying "those most responsible for crimes against civilians".
The Council then warned Sudan that it had to cooperate.
The warrant request for Mr Bashir will now be considered by a panel of three court judges.
If they issue the warrant, Sudan will be obliged to arrest its own president, in effect the president handing himself over, which nobody expects will happen.
However, under Article 89, Mr Bashir might also be liable to arrest if he visits one of the 106 states that are parties to the treaty.
Article 89 of the court's statute says that the court "may transit a request for the arrest and surrender of a person...to any state on the territory of which that person may be found..."
A warrant would also pose some other difficulties, for example, to those maintaining contacts with Mr Bashir.
This might affect China, a major arms supplier to Sudan.
It is new diplomatic territory.
Paul.Reynolds-INTERNET@bbc.co.uk |
|