Bi-polarity to
gasping uni-polarity
Asif Haroon Raja
End of Bi-Polar World. As explained in my earlier article titled
‘World Wars and Cold War’, during
the Cold War, proxy wars were common because the two super powers didn’t dare
to fight each other directly due to nuclear deterrence. The US led west
demonized USSR and scared the world to keep away from the monster of communism.
The US projected itself as the champion of democracy and human rights and
guardian of free world. CIA was used covertly and NATO overtly to spread US
area of influence. KGB assisted by Warsaw Pact military alliance of seven
Eastern European States did the same. In the aftermath of defeat and pullout of
Soviet forces from Afghanistan in February 1989, followed by Michael
Gorbachev’s glasnost to democratize communism and Perestroika to open up and
restructure economy resulted in Soviet economic meltdown. Several Soviet
Republics rebelled and sought independence. With its military and nuclear power
intact, the huge Soviet Empire fragmented from within on December 15, 1991 and
broke into 15 smaller States and USSR shrunk to Russian Federation. The US
emerged as the sole super power putting an end to bi-polar world and giving way
to uni-polar world.
Islam Projected as Chief Threat
The neo-cons in USA and American Jewish
lobby mulled over how to make 21st century the ‘American Century’ and to rule
the world for next hundred years. For the achievement of this goal, a
convincing motive had to be manufactured. The New World Order (NWO) conceived
by George W. Bush senior in 1989 was modified and the Red Army threat was
replaced with green flag threat. Islam was hyped and projected as the chief
threat to US dominated capitalism and international order.
Within Muslim world, radical States such
as Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Libya, Sudan, Lebanon, Somalia and Iran were
marked as ‘dangerous’. This was confirmed by Patrick Buchman in 2003. Samuel
Huntington gave credence to this theme in 1990s by writing in his book ‘Clash
of Civilizations’ that in future, wars would no longer take place between
countries but between cultures and that the best candidate for the upcoming
divide would be between Islam and the west.
Brzezinski’s Concept of Eurasia. One of the major
reasons of projecting Islam as the major threat to US hegemony was the concept
of US uni-polarism propounded by Brzezinski in 1970s. For the achievement of
this ambitious objective, he like the earlier strategists held Eurasia as the
key region, the capture of which would ensure control over Africa and
facilitate world domination. Eurasia is the largest continent where lay
treasures of the world. For effective control of Eurasia, he had recommended establishment
of western front in Europe and southern front in Asia complementing each other.
He was categorical in his assessment that whosoever controlled Eurasia
dominated the world.
NATO made Relevant. NATO had lost its relevance to
exist after the end of Cold War and dismantlement of Warsaw Pact for which it
had been created. Some way had to be found to keep it operational. NATO was
tasked to expand eastward and integrate as many East European, Baltic and
Caucasus States. It got heavily involved in Balkans. Once its membership jumped
from 16 to 28 States, it was made into a global task force. The western front
was thus maintained and not dissolved. Paradoxically, the western front was
reinforced after dismantling the southern front in Afghanistan in 1989.
Establishment of Two Fronts
Having consolidated and expanded NATO in
the 1990s, the US hawks then waited for an opportunity or an excuse to
establish southern front in Asia for which Afghanistan and Iraq had been
earmarked as target countries in the modified draft of NWO in 1997. 9/11,
whether real or engineered, provided the excuse the US was eagerly looking for
to occupy Afghanistan and Iraq.
Demolition of Afghanistan in November 2001
and Iraq in 2003 undertaken by George W Bush junior led neo-cons (Dick Cheney,
Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz) were aimed at establishing a secure southern front to
complement the western front that was established by merging Eastern Europe
into European Union in early 1990s. The underlying idea behind the
establishment of two fronts was to disrupt and occupy Central Asia, capture all
its energy resources and thus gain control over whole of Eurasian continent as
propounded by Brzezinski.
Russia under Boris Yeltsin. Russia under drunkard
Boris Yeltsin remained economically dependent upon USA and Western Europe to
survive. Yeltsin’s lackadaisical approach allowed NATO and CIA to extend their
outreach into Eastern Europe and re-integrate it into Western Europe. CIA was
actively involved in fomenting color revolutions in Eastern Europe, Baltic,
Caucasus and Central Asia. Biggest breakthroughs were fall of Berlin wall and
reunification of Germany, breakup of Yugoslavia into six independent States and
disintegration of Czechoslovakia. NATO’s eastward drive towards the heartland
of Russia and the US insistence to deploy Missile Defense Shield were hostile
steps and in violation of the US-Russia treaty signed in 1990 that the US will
not threaten Russia’s security interests.
Russia under Vladimir Putin
In the new millennium, the situation began
to change when Russia came under Putin in 1999. Since then, he has remained in
power at a stretch and held both the appointments of President and PM. He
resolved to rebuild weakened Russia and regain part if not all the glory of
demolished Soviet Empire. He started to reassert Russia’s authority in global
politics as well as over its breakaway Republics by making good use of its oil
and gas resources. EU became dependent upon Gazprom for gas. Six Central Asian
Republics are the soft belly of Russia, on which the US has its eyes since long
and which Russia can ill-afford to lose. Both Russia and China are keeping this
vital region in their loop with the help of SCO.
In order to keep resurgent Russia under
control, Bush administration embarked upon a highly expensive and controversial
Missile Defence Shield (MDS) program under the plea of safeguarding USA from
rogue States like North Korea and Iran. Poland and Czech Republic were
persuaded to deploy components of the MDS. Putin expressed his concerns
asserting that the MDS was Russia focused and threatened to counter the threat.
It strained US-Russia relations.
Russo-US Encounters
After the CIA inspired rose revolution in
Georgia which brought down President Eduard Shevardnadze and brought in
pro-western President Mikhail Saakashvilli to power in 2004, the first serious
Russian encounter with the US took place in Georgia in August 2008 when Russian
troops invaded Georgia on August 8, 2008 and by 10th occupied
several Georgian cities and bulk of breakaway South Ossetia as well as
Abkhazia. Since then, South Ossetia and Abkhazia are firmly in control of
Moscow.
The next standoff between the two has
taken place in Ukraine. When the government of pro-Moscow President Viktor
Yanukovych was overthrown in February 2014, he fled to Russia. Putin reacted by
sending Russian troops and seizing Crimea in early March and amassing 40,000
troops along eastern border of Ukraine. Sevastopol seaport in Crimea is an
important Russian naval base which it cannot afford to lose. In a popular
referendum held on March 16, Crimeans voted to join Russia. After ratification
by the two houses of Russian Parliament, annexation of Crimea was formalized on
March 21.
Ten cities of Eastern Ukraine are heavily
populated by Russian speaking and pro-Russia people. Unrest is going on in
several cities and militants are urging Moscow to send in Russian troops.
Although NATO has thus far shown restraint by desisting from moving towards
Ukraine’s western border, situation is still tense. While Putin is using gas as
a weapon to tighten up Ukraine, EU which is itself heavily dependent upon
Russian oil and gas, at the behest of USA has imposed sanctions and threatened
to apply further sanctions to force Russia to lay its hands off Ukraine. The US
accused Russia for attacking Ukraine on trumped-up pretext and has hurled a
warning, giving rise to fears that another Cold War may be in the offing.
Turbulent Middle East
The US controlled strategically important
Middle East by propping up authoritarian regimes and establishing GCC
comprising six Gulf States and making Iran under Reza Shah Pahlavi as the
policemen of the Persian Gulf. In addition, Israel was created in 1948 at the
cost of Palestinians. It was economically and militarily bolstered to bully the
Arab States. While the US succeeded in neutralizing Egypt through Camp David
Accord in 1979, it lost Iran in March 1979 after Imam Khomeini took over power.
Another emerging power Iraq, seen as an obstacle in the way of Israel to become
unchallenged power of the region was weakened through 8-year war with Iran,
First Gulf War in 1991 and imposition of harsh sanctions.
Invasion of Iraq. When these
incapacitating acts failed to bring down Saddam, the US under George W Bush led
neo-cons and Jews chalked out a grand plan to change the boundaries of the
Middle East, replace radical rulers with compliant and secular rulers, harness
oil resources and make Israel the super power of Middle East. The plan
envisaged piecemeal annexation of Arab States. The first axe fell upon Iraq in
March 2003 after pasting trumped up charges. Although occupation forces left
Iraq, they have left behind embers of sectarianism. Hardly a day passes without
suicide attack/bomb blast.
Regime Change in Libya
Taking advantage of the Arab Spring,
insurgency was fomented by CIA in Libya in 2011 to bring down Qaddafi regime.
Handfuls of Libyan rebels mostly living in exile were instigated by CIA to
start an armed rebellion. UK and France led the assault and within months Libya
was destroyed, the regime toppled and Qaddafi brutally murdered. Chaos in Libya
was premeditated because Libya was a stable African society in North Africa and
Qaddafi had made it into a real welfare State. He wanted to use the water, oil
and financial resources of Libya and the intelligence of the Libyan people for
the reconstruction of Africa. In order to solidify African Union, Qaddafi
wanted to build an African Monetary Fund, an African Central Bank, and an
African common currency. Moreover, Qaddafi had moved to take over the Arab
banking corporation in Bahrain, and the Libyan leadership had over
$200 billion in foreign reserves. Common currency for Africa would have
been a threat to Western Europe and North America and a real danger to Euro as
well as to the US dollar.
Besides, Chinese had become the dominant
force in infrastructure development within Libya. There were over 36,000
Chinese involved in railway, road, water, agriculture, and other forms.
Libyan-Pakistan defence ties had grown manifold and Libya had placed a big
order for purchasing defence equipment from Pakistan. While Libya was playing
ball with Russia and China, it was also very friendly with the west and
cooperating with them since 2004 but still was viewed as unpredictable by
western oil and defence tycoons. To save euro/dollar and to capture Libyan oil,
Qaddafi had to be removed. Although Libyan oil is now being controlled by the
US/western companies, political and security situation is highly unstable.
Syrian Crisis. Syrian crisis from
2011 to 2013 saw Russia, Iran and Hezbollah standing behind Bashar al Asad and
the US, EU, Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Gulf States supporting Syrian Sunni rebels
wanting to bring down Asad’s Alawite regime. When government forces gained an
edge over the rebels in mid 2013, a chemical weapons attack on a Syrian town
north of Damascus was engineered and drummed up. Making it an excuse, the US
ordered NATO to strike Syrian defence infrastructure with cruise missiles.
However, at the 11th hour, Obama took a u turn in the wake of
Putin’s mediation, offering to dismantle Syrian chemical stockpiles. US
backtracking have tensed US-Saudi relations. While the western threat has
receded, Syria is engulfed in a new crisis in which the Islamic militias are
fighting among each other much to the delight of Israel. Islamic State of Iraq
& Levant (ISIL), till recent linked with al-Qaeda is pitched against Free
Syrian Army (Sunni Syrian rebels), Syrian Revolutionary Front, Army of
Mujahideen, Islamic Front (supported by Saudi Arabia) and Jabhat al-Nusra
(Nusra Front). Ghuraba al-Shams group is in clash with Nusra Front. Jundul Aqsa
and Jaish al Muhajireen are independent.
Iran’s Defiance
Iran under Khomeini completed full cycle
of Islamic revolution and became militarily stronger and a staunch opponent of
USA and Israel. Iran added to its military muscle by embarking upon nuclear
program, which it maintained was meant for peaceful purposes. Both Israel and
the US backed by the EU alleged that Iran was developing a nuclear weapon and
exerted extreme diplomatic pressure together with four rounds of sanctions and
military threats to force Tehran to abandon its program. Covert war was
initiated by CIA to affect a regime change.
Replacement of outspoken anti-US/Israel
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad with moderate pro-western Hassan Rouhani belonging to
Reformist Party in June 2013 brought a change in US stance and it chose to
befriend Iran after the latter signed interim nuclear deal in November 2013
pledging that it would roll back its nuclear program in return for easing of
economic sanctions. Thaw in Iran-US relations further strained Saudi-US
relations since Riyadh has considered Iran as a threat to Sunni Arab regimes. Rift
between Riyadh and Doha over latter’s refusal to refrain from supporting Muslim
Brotherhood in Egypt and elsewhere was another cause of concern for Saudi
Kingdom.
Fears of Gulf States
Gulf Arab States want an interim
government in Damascus and the resignation of President Bashar al-Assad.
Gulf kingdoms also have serious concerns about Iran’s nuclear ambitions and its
dangerous designs in the Middle East. The Shia crescent formed by Syria,
Hezbollah dominated Lebanon, Bahrain, eastern Saudi Arabia and southern Iraq is
seen as a big threat to Sunni kingdoms in Middle East. Suspecting that Shia
uprising in Bahrain in 2011 was Iran inspired, Saudi led Gulf Force was dashed
to quash it. They fear Iran’s potential nuclear weapons capability and deeply
distrust the Americans for their overtures to Tehran.
Obama during his recent visit to Riyadh
has tried to allay Saudi fears and has promised to provide ground-to-air
portable missiles to the Sunni rebels in Syria and to disable Iran’s weapon
oriented nuclear program.
Turkey’s Phenomenal Economic Growth
Despite being the leader of seculars
within the Muslim world since Kamal Ataturk days and member of NATO, Turkey has
not been given membership of EU. In the 1990s, Turkey economy had become sick
and it came under heavy debt of IMF. Its economy however began to progress
dramatically when AKP led by Tayyip Erdogon took over in 2002 and made the
country Islamic Republic. While Turkish constitution is secular, in practice it
is Islamist. Within less than a decade it solved political, judicial, financial
and economic problems. By 2005 all loans of IMF were cleared and in 2007 Turkey
was in a position to extend loan to IMF and EU countries.
Today it is 16th largest
economy in the world and is in a position to lead the Muslim world. Its output
has reached $820 billion and has $400 billion worth trade. It has 27 trade
partners all over the world and in a decade it attracted $120 billion FSD.
Stunning economic progress made by the incumbent government coupled with Erdogon’s
tough stand taken against Israel after the incident of peace flotilla in the
high seas has become a cause of worry for the US led west. It is suspected that
a willful vicious propaganda has been launched by the US based cleric Gullen
and his supporters in Turkey and western media to undermine and bring down the
government.
Pakistan
Pakistan has emerged as the sole Muslim
country with nuclear capability backed by robust armed forces with reasonably
strong defence industrial and technical base and plenty of skilled labor force.
Israel has remained worried that Pakistan may not gift Islamic bombs to radical
Muslim countries in its neighborhood. India is more vexed since nuclear parity
has blunted its blackmailing tactics and imperialist designs. The US is
concerned about Sino-Pakistan conviviality since the future role assigned to
India cannot be accomplished without breaking up Pakistan or making it a
compliant State of India. It is vying to wean away Central Asian Republics
brimming with natural resources from Sino-Russo influence and for piping out
oil and gas for western markets through Port Gawadar. Indo-US-Israeli nexus has
been striving hard since 1980s to denuclearize Pakistan and make it a Satellite
State of India. Their efforts were stepped up after 2001 and they nearly
succeeded in declaring Pakistan a failing and ungovernable State when the PPP
regime was in power.
Consequent to change of government in
Pakistan in May 2013 and changing alignments in Middle East, Riyadh, Bahrain
and other Gulf States have begun to lean more heavily upon Pakistan. Its high
officials undertook series of visits to Pakistan in January-February this year
and inked several MoUs. Pak-Turk cooperation has also keyed up. South Korea has
offered to make investments in Pakistan. Notwithstanding positive developments,
what is worrying for Pakistan is not so friendly behavior of Afghanistan and
Iran and growing strategic partnership of Iran and Afghanistan with India. Fast
track development of Chahbahar Port in Iran by India is aimed at undermining
Gawadar Port.
India under extremist Narendra Modi, known
for his anti-Muslim/Pakistan stance may not auger well for Pakistan. Latest
revelation made by Carlotta Gall that Pakistan and not Afghanistan was the real
target lends strength to my repeated write ups asserting that the US is a foe
and not a friend. There are worrying reports that India-Israel-Afghanistan-Iran
backed by CIA have chalked out a sinister plan to launch a full-scale propaganda
assault against Pakistan. Engineered attack on Hamid Mir could be a link of the
same chain.
Russo-China-US Altering Relationship
During the Cold War, USSR and China, the
two largest Communist States fell apart in 1960 owing to political, cultural
and ideological differences. Sino-US détente in 1972 further distanced USSR
from China. Gorbachev mended fences with China in 1989 and today the two
neighbors have become close allies. China has emerged as the chief rival of USA
with all the trappings of future super power.
The US leans upon India to help it in
encircling and containing phenomenal rise of China. The US in league with India
is trying hard to win over as many littoral States around the Indian Ocean to
check China’s ingress into the Indian Ocean laced with critical choke points
and Sea Lanes of Communication (SLOC). It is
building coalitions with regional allies like
Australia, Japan and the Philippines, and partners like Vietnam and India to
bring Indian Ocean under full control to ensure uninterrupted flow of
oil. Washington is currently promoting an
‘Indo-Pacific’ concept, which connects the Indian and Pacific Oceans as part of
its approach towards Indian Ocean. Haunted by the threat to its
corporate capitalism because of China’s economic model which has lifted 300
million people Chinese out of poverty; American writers are accusing China of
endangering global stability.
Although China’s
strategic focus continues to be on the Pacific, China’s priority will always be
on protecting its energy security interests by way of securing the SLOC,
spreading from the Gulf to the South China Sea. China is keen to develop
Gawadar seaport so that its navy could checkmate Indo-US dominance of Indian
Ocean and protect the SLOC, vital for the country’s energy imports. China has
made deep inroads in the Middle East and Africa which include many Littoral
States. Revival of old Silk Route through envisaged economic corridor from
Kashgar to Gawadar and Karachi has the potential to make the region prosperous
and self reliant. It will however upset Indo-US game-plan of developing an
alternative Silk Route in which the duo would be major beneficiaries.
Uni-polar World Gasping for Life
In 1992 the US emerged as the unchallenged
sole super power. In 2001 when George W. Bush triggered the Global War on
Terror and the whole world fell in line, the US was economically, politically,
diplomatically and militarily the strongest nation in the world. It was the
largest aid-giver and leader of the First world. It had $ 15 trillion economy, and was looked at with awe and envy
for being the “sole superpower.” In little
over two decades, uni-polarism has begun to totter and it is speculated that
all-powerful USA is fast running out of steam and sooner than later
uni-polarity will be replaced by multi-polarity. Many say that the era of the
US global hegemony is over. While Putin is looked at with respect for his deft
handling of critical situations, American elite judge Obama as a weak president
responsible for the loss of global clout which the US enjoyed.
Today the US
is burdened with a national debt of $ 16.3 trillion and a total debt close to $
59 trillion with very little chance of recovery in the foreseeable future
despite the discovery of Shale gas. Apart from the debt which it has
accumulated because of its craze for foreign adventures, the US leadership has
also amassed tons of hate against America around the world, raging particularly
in the Muslim world. This is in spite of the US doling out aid/grants to the needy
countries generously and making substantive contributions in terms of science
and technology. Still, the US is presently one of the most hated nations on
earth.
The US track
record during and after the Cold War is that it has always attacked economically
and militarily poor countries. Excepting Israel and India, the aid it lends to
its allies is always attached with tough conditions and for self-serving
purposes. Besides bloody wars, destabilization of elected governments or regime
change through gruesome covert operations is another favorite hobby of American
leaders. Pakistan has suffered the most at the hands of US and its ally India.
Among the
major reasons of USA’s decline are its dual standards and discriminatory policy
with regard to Palestinian/Kashmir issues and its subservience to Israel,
aggressive policies of pre-emption and unilateralism, anti-Islam/Muslim policy,
its grandiose plans to redraw the boundaries of the Middle East and to take
control of oil resources, lust for untapped mineral resources of Central Asia,
over indulgence in highly expensive war on terror and in covert wars to
neo-colonize the Muslim world. All its high-flying objectives have gone for a
six after it got stuck in the quagmire of Afghanistan. Last but not least, the
2008 global recession has badly impacted the US and European economies. Rag-tag
Afghan Mujahideen having humbled the Soviet Empire have now rolled the honor
and prestige of the sole super/hyper power in dust.
The US sudden
and rapid decline has made its self-created financial institutions like IMF and
World Bank weary and defiant. They are not favoring the US suggestion to create
alternative financial institutions by BRICS. While majority of Latin American States have moved out
of the influence of North America, even Europe led by Germany and France is
showing signs of non-cooperation. Putin is cleverly playing upon the
sensitivities of European countries to draw a wedge between Europe and USA.
China has reduced American influence in Africa to insignificance and is raring
to become an economic super power by 2025. Saudi Arabia and other Gulf States
no more crave for US friendship. New power centres have emerged and new
alignments are shaping up. The invincible NATO is breaking up after its
humiliation in Iraq and particularly in Afghanistan. Despite using excessive
force, Islam couldn’t be undermined. Rather, it has gained ground and biggest
conversion rate to Islam is in USA. Growing isolation of the US in the world
has blurred ‘American Century’ dream.
The US can
recover ground if the leadership changes its posture from arrogance to
affability, restrain Pentagon from adventurism, CIA from covert operations and
media from propaganda war, gets rid of perverse influence of Israel, India and
UK, decentralize power concentrated in the hands of 1% American elites,
formulate even-handed global policies to make the world peaceful and last but
not least, mend fences with the Muslim world.
|