Mistakes &
Accomplishments of Gen Pervez Musharraf
Asif Haroon Raja
The Army, paramilitary forces and the police
are fighting the US dictated war on terror since 2003 but have yet not been
able to completely root out terrorism. I will be frank in stating that the Army
was not mentally prepared, trained, equipped, acclimatized and motivated when
it was suddenly launched to conduct irregular warfare in South Waziristan (SW).
As a result, its performance for the first five years was not up to the mark
and it suffered reverses. The Tehreek Taliban Pakistan (TTP) took advantage of
it and managed to gain influence over 18 administrative units in the northwest
and became a powerful force to reckon with. A state within state was created in
Swat while SW became the main base of operation with its tentacles in other six
tribal agencies. Another important factor behind not so good performance of
security forces was the double game played by the so-called friends of Pakistan
that were on the quiet supporting and creating space for the very terrorists
Pakistan was asked to fight.
Gen Pervez Musharraf was appointed Army chief
on October 6, 1998 and soon after he ventured into Dras-Kargil inside Indian
Occupied Kashmir (IOK), which is quite intriguing and raises many questions. It
strained civil-military relations and led to the downfall of Nawaz Sharif. As DGMO under Gen Jahangir Karamat, in his operational briefing
to the then PM Benazir Bhutto in 1996, he had presented
Kargil plan and was keen to execute it.(1). She trashed it realizing its
consequences.
Commenting
on Kargil conflictin 1999 which had brought the two nuclear rivals close to war
with nuclear overtones, Musharraf proudly proclaims, “Our maneuver was
conducted flawlessly, a tactical marvel of military professionalism; a plan for
plugging gaps between our positions was formally presented and approved towards
the middle of January 1999. (2).
According to Lt-Gen (retd) Shahid Aziz who was heading ‘Analysis
Wing’ of ISI during the conflict: “The Kargil war was an unsound military plan
based on invalid assumptions, launched with little preparation and in total
disregard of the regional and international environment”. (3). Late ex-DG
ISI Gen Hamid Gul was also of the view that a military operation without a
clear political purpose was like shot in the dark and Musharraf should have
faced court martial for his harebrained adventure.
Kargil operation was undoubtedly a brilliant tactical maneuver
which causedparalytic effects on the Indian military, but it failed in
achieving the objective of de-freezing and internationalizing the Kashmir issue
as had been contemplated. It should have been planned in entirety and not as a
piecemeal operation. Helped by the US and G-8, India converted its tactical
defeat into victory on the media plane.
Musharraf took over the reins of the country
on October 12, 1999 after dethroning the elected government of Nawaz Sharif
through a military coup. He wore the hats of President, Army chief and CJCSC
and remained in full power till October 2007 after which he shed off his
military hats and finally abdicated his President seat in August 2008 and went
into exile under an agreement in April 2009. He made a political party All
Pakistan Muslim League (APML) and returned home to take part in May 2013
general elections. Not only he was put under house arrest and on Exit Control
List, he was debarred from contesting elections. He was charged with several
cases which included Benazir Bhutto murder case, Nawab Akbar Bugti murder case,
Lal Masjid case and subversion of constitution on November 3, 2007. The last
case has been termed as an act of treason and comes under Article 6 of the
Constitution. He underwent the embarrassment of media trial and also suffered
the stings of hate from his opponents.
After about three years of ordeal, he
proceeded to Dubai for medical treatment of his backache and the Supreme Court
and the federal government facilitated his exit. The media has been
highlighting his wealth in foreign banks/offshore companies and people are
asking questions as to how he could amass so much of wealth. Courts are
pressing his lawyers to produce him and have issued non-bail-able arrest
warrants. He is often seen on the TV channels and known for his power of
arguments, he keeps telling his side of the story in reply to number of
accusations made against him.
Mistakes made by Musharraf. Taking stock of his nine years tenure,
Musharraf had committed mistakes but he also had done good things. It will be in fitness of things to first dispassionately have a
look at those accusations that exist in public memory. Just to recapitulate, I
am tabulating these here. First
the accusations made against him:
1.
He and his team
had no plausible reason to oust a democratically elected government and
takeover power.
2.
He should not
have accepted all the seven demands of the US after 9/11 and that too without
consulting others. He gave in to the US demands too
quickly, and cheaply, which set into motion a slippery path for Pakistan, its
social fabric, politics and institutions and because of which we are still
suffering.
3.
His reason to succumb to US
pressure and accept all the demands was that he had been threatened that in
case he decided not to side with the US, Pakistan will be bombed to ‘Stone Age’
has triggered a controversy. In his
autobiography, “In the Line of Fire” on page 201 he writes: “When I was
back in Islamabad the next day, our DG ISI, who happened to be in Washington,
told me on the phone about his meeting with the U.S. Deputy Secretary of State,
Richard Armitage. In what has to be the most undiplomatic statement ever made,
Armitage added to what Colin Powell had said to me and told the DG not only
that we had to decide whether we were with America or with the terrorists, but
that if we chose the terrorists, then we should be prepared to be bombed back
to the Stone Age. This was a shockingly barefaced threat, but it was obvious
that the US had decided to hit back hard”. (4).
But apparently, both of these statements are not correct. There
is now enough evidence to prove thatthere was no direct military threat made to
Pakistan. George Bush, Colin Powell and Richard Armitage have all denied in
their separate memoirs that they ever threatened Pakistan with military action,
let alone the threat of bombing it back to the Stone Age. (5). In his book
“Bush at War” at page 59, Bob Woodward writes: “at I:30 P.M. on 13th September
2001, Powell called Musharraf” and “Musharraf to
Powell’s surprise said that Pakistan would support the US with each of the
seven actions”.
In 2006, when Bush was asked about the threat made against
Pakistan, he claimed that the first time he had ever heard of it was when he
had read a report of Musharraf’s remarks in that day’s newspaper. “I guess I
was taken aback by the harshness of the words,” said Bush. “All I can tell you
is that shortly after 9/11, Colin Powell came in and said, President Musharraf
understands the stakes and he wants to join and help root out an enemy that has
come and killed 3,000 of our citizens. I don’t know of any conversation that
was reported in the newspaper like that. I just don’t know about it”.(6).
4.
Musharraf’s sudden U-turn on
Afghanistan and betrayal of Muslim brothers of Afghanistan was flawed and
Pakistan is still paying a heavy price for it through blood and flesh. Even now,
a resurgent Taliban don’t trust us.
5.
Sending regular troops into
South Waziristan (SW) in 2003 at the behest of USA to flush out Al-Qaeda and
its sympathizers was in violation of the 1948 Agreement with the tribesmen, and
it triggered insurgency in FATA.
6.
He shouldn’t have
given a free hand to the CIA and FBI from 2006 onward to track Al-Qaeda in
Pakistan. It gave a free hand to the foreign and regional agencies
to establish their inter-connected network in Pakistan amongst the aggrieved
tribal elements and religious groups. CIA got office space in the ISI
headquarters, Pakistani civilians were bombed with drones, and Blackwater agents
roamed freely all over Pakistan until Musharraf was replaced by Gen Ashfaq
Pervez Kayani. It was this ‘network of agencies’ that subsequently played havoc
with Pakistani lives and targeted key institutions.
7.
Allowing
CIA to use Shamsi airbase in Baluchistan for drone strikes helped CIA to
bolster BLA, BRA and BLF in Baluchistan and to create space for the launch of
TTP in FATA.
8.
Rather than working on his 7
point agenda which had germs of success, his option to create a King’s party
comprising of turn coats from other political parties and who were tagged with National Accountability Bureau (NAB) cases was selfish
and politically motivated – and eroded whatever good work NAB had been doing.His much trumpeted across the board accountability, both
horizontal and vertical went for a six.
9. Change of policy on Kashmir was a blunder
which gave a severe blow to liberation movement in occupied Kashmir. APHC was
divided into two factions and Pakistan’s age-old stance based on UN Resolutions
was compromised. It antagonized the Kashmir focused Jihadi groups and they
chose to join hands with TTP.
10. Pak
military gave a befitting response to Indian aggressive posturing after
carrying out a false flag operation on Indian Parliament on December 13, 2001
and carrying out biggest troop deployment along the border after 1971 followed
by a military standoff for next ten months.
11. Indian
military withdrew without achieving any objective, but Musharraf caved in on
political/diplomatic front under the US pressure. He banned six Kashmiri Jihadi
groups and froze their accounts, ceased firing in Kashmir, and gave a written
unilateral commitment that Pakistan will not allow its space for use for cross
border terrorism.He agreed to allow India to fence the entire length of Line of
Control (LoC) in Kashmir.
12. In
response, Vajpayee signed peace treaty with Pakistan in January 2004 and
assured that all outstanding issues including Kashmir will be resolved through
composite dialogue. This was in fact a big trap and Musharraf fell into it.
13. India
quietened the eastern front but on the quiet opened western front and used
Afghan soil for carrying out massive covert operations to destabilize,
denuclearize and balkanize Pakistan. Additionally, it used eastern front for
people-to-people contact but in reality was meant to launch Indian cultural
invasion and rob the youth of its fighting spirit and sink it in the pool of
fun and frolic.
14. Rather
than making a change in strategy on Kashmir, Musharraf unilaterally changed the
Kashmir policy by announcing out of box solution and depriving Pakistan of its
principled stance based on UN resolutions. He thus gave a severe blow to
freedom movement in Kashmir which in that timeframe had peaked.
15. While he kept doing more and more, he never realized that USA,
India and Afghanistan were not friends but playing a double game; and that
Pakistan was not an ally but a target. His yielding to ‘do more’
policy to please the US – often acting in cahoots with India – was detrimental
to Pakistan’s interests.
16. Musharraf’s
“Concept of Enlightened Moderation” (apparently drafted by Henry Kissinger
Associates) was in contravention to Objectives Resolution and Quaid-e-Azam’s
dream of making Pakistan an Islamic welfare state. In his apparent bid to show
soft face of Pakistan to the world, he strove to make Pakistan a secular state.
This open declaration of secularism hurt the
aspirations of the people of Pakistan and ended up igniting storm
of religious extremism
17. Sacking of Chief Justice of Pakistan Iftikhar Chaudhryin
March 2007 was a wrong move which triggered lawyers’ movement and led to his
fall.
18. The other mistake he made was going out of the
way to politically strengthen MQM about which I am sure the ISI and MI
Directorate would have given sufficient information about its linkage with RAW
since 1989. It was a miscalculation which he thought was in his own
self-interest, but it was his worst sin, which
caused grievous harm to Karachi, Pakistan’s economy and jolted Pakistan.
19. National Reconciliation Ordinance (NRO) was
his biggest blunder which cleansed the entire leadership of PPP involved in
mega corruption and 8000 leaders and activists of MQM involved in heinous
crimes. Condeela Rice was the moving force behind NRO which envisaged Musharraf-Benazir
sharing power for next five years. Itenabled the US and the UK to empower their
dream team of PPP-MQM-ANP from which it was to execute the final phase of their
gory plan of making Pakistan a compliant state.
20. Musharraf paid no heed to the emerging energy crisis and despite
holding all the levers of power and repeatedly pledging that he will construct the
Kalabagh dam, he didn’t do so. Answering
a question of Dr. Moeed Pirzada on 11th September 2016, Dunya News, he stated
about Kalabagh dam: “We couldn’t construct Kalabagh dam due to political
situation”. Factually, he aborted the decision to construct Kalabagh Dam after
receiving a call from MQM chief Altaf Hussain. The latter is of course remote
controlled by foreign agencies and India not wanting Kalabagh dam at any cost
must have twisted his arm. But Musharraf oblivious of all that continuously
nurtured Altaf Hussain’s MQM during 9 years of his regime.
21. Although
he claims that the Americans never interfered in high rank military postings
during his regime, George Bush disclosed in his autobiography that Musharraf
resigned from the post of chief of army staff, lifted the emergency and held
free elections upon his “strong suggestion” in the fall of 2007.(7 ).
22. He
took official jets to set out on tours of Europe and America on promotional
campaigns for boosting the sale of his book “In the Line of Fire”.
23. Musharraf’s
disclosure in the book that the US had paid millions of dollars to Pakistan for
capturing Al Qaeda operatives was a humiliation for the country. Under the US
law, they cannot give prize money to any government or institution, and the
Govt of Pakistan has denied receiving any such payments.
24. He
couldn’t be more wrong when he tried to drag ethnicity as one the key factor
for his selection as Army chief. On page 136 of his book he writes “It
could be that such affronts on my part made the prime minister realize his
folly in selecting me for my position. He had probably thought that being the
son of immigrant parents, I would acquiesce in his demands ___ that I would
feel insecure and vulnerable and do his bidding.”
Musharraf’s Achievements
He broke the isolation of Pakistan and made it
relevant. He strengthened state corporations. After a long time the Railway and
PIA became profitable organizations and the Steel Mills for the first time in
its history earned largest profit. Inflation and prices remained within limits
and value of dollar didn’t cross Rs 60. GDP was above 7% and foreign exchange
reserves were increased from $ 3 million to $ 14 billion. Pakistan for the
first time in its history came out of the noose of IMF and foreign debts
decreased from $ 38 billion to $ 34 billion. Foundation of Diamer Bhasha dam
was laid in his time, which was not pursued by the successor political regime. Ghazi
Barotha project was completed during his time. There was no shortage of gas and
load shedding was minimal. There was boom in property and stocks were bullish.
Al-Khalid tank was developed into a main
battle tank and joint manufacture of JF-17 Thunders was undertaken which was
quite an accomplishment. He established Strategic Plans Division (SPD) and
placed all nuclear/missile related setups under it, which formulated
comprehensive nuclear doctrine and gave the concept of minimum nuclear
deterrence. Surface to surface, air to air and air to surface missiles were
radically improved and work on cruise missiles and drones was initiated. Three
Agosta submarines were upgraded and given capability to fire nuclear warheads
while remaining 400 feet submerged in sea, giving Pakistan second strike
capability. All nuclear facilities were made safe and secure under foolproof
multi-layered security system compatible with international standards.Despite
the fact that Dr. AQ Khan had passed on designs of old centrifuge to Iran,
Libya and North Korea, Musharraf handled the crisis well and disallowed the
IAEA to inspect our nuclear arsenal or to interview AQ Khan.
With regard to the oft repeated charge that
Musharraf buckled under pressure and cheaply gave in to Colin Powel’s demands,
in hindsight I may dare to say that it was not altogether a sellout as
generally perceived. Had he refused, the US that had made up its mind to attack
Afghanistan and the whole world including the UN was supportive of the military
venture, would have taken on Afghanistan and Pakistan in one swipe with its air
power as was suggested by India and Israel. Pakistan air force with 700 to 800
aircraft was in no position to counter the aerial cum cruise missile threat of
US-NATO having 30,000 warplanes and sophisticated technology. The US-NATOairpower
was in good position to destroy our communication, economic, defence
infrastructures and nuclear plants.
Our missile technology was not potent enough
to do any damage particularly when the US had satellite jamming and imagery
capability. Indian military for certain would have activated the eastern front
to engage our ground forces once the PAF, tanks and strategic assets had been
taken care of by the US B-52s, Daisy cutters, stealth helicopters and cruise
missiles.
As regard the accusation that Musharraf
ditched the Taliban at the behest of Washington, the Taliban had no choice but
to withdraw and abandon Afghanistan in the face of systematic carpet bombing.
They had no means to fight against air power. Had Pakistan been bombed and
pushed to Stone Age, the Taliban could not have taken shelter in
FATA/Baluchistan, regrouped and then waged a resistance war. It was simply
impossible for the Taliban who had been forsaken by the world to carryout
sustained struggle for 14 years without receiving training, weapons, equipment,
funds and guidance and safe havens for the leaders. Haqqani network in North
Waziristan and Quetta Shura could not have functioned at their own. Had it been
otherwise, how come Pakistan handed over more than 3 dozens Taliban leaders to
Afghan government in 2013 and 2014? It was not possible for Mulla Omar to
remain off the radar all these years. He died in April 2013 but these news were
learnt in July 2015.
Another accusation against him is that
he antagonized the tribesmen by sending regular troops to FATA. Had he not done
so, the ISAF troops would have certainly barged into SW to hunt Al-Qaeda as was
being threatened. Such a move could have jeopardized the regrouping of Afghan
Taliban to wage resistance movement against occupying forces.
Musharraf was also accused of
hobnobbing with Israel and holding a meeting with Israeli PM In Turkey, but at
the end of the day he neither recognized Israel nor opened up diplomatic
relations despite lingering rumors. But
this statement of former and late Israeli President Shimon Peres cannot also be disregarded. “As
a good Jewish boy, I would have never dreamed that I would pray for the safety
of Musharraf, the president of Pakistan. That is a most unexpected experience.”(8).
I guess Musharraf’s best move was to push
forward the Gwadar project with the help of China in 2002, which FM Ayub Khan
wanted to develop as a port after he had purchased it from Oman in 1959, but
Shah of Iran requested him not to do so. One reason of triggering an armed
insurgency in Baluchistan by USA was Gwadar seaport.
His next best move was to sign
Iran-Pakistan-India gas pipeline project agreement. Commissioning of this
project would have provided India its 40% gas need. India walked out of it not
only because of the US pressure and the lure of civil nuclear deal with USA,
but also because of the fact that it would have effectively neutralized India’s
blackmail through water terrorism. In case of India blocking Pakistan’s water
in the three rivers, Pakistan could have retaliated by blocking the vitally
needed gas.
In hindsight, weighing the mistakes and
achievements of Gen Musharraf, I leave it to your judgement as to who played a
better double game and who had the last laugh.
References:
(1).Interview with “Third Eye Television” 2003
(2).In the Line of
Fire, Page 90
(3).Daily Mail 2013, Qaswar
Abbas
(4). In the Line
of Fire, p 201.
(5). Bush at War by Bob Woodward, p 59.
(6).US threatened to bomb Pakistan back to “the Stone
Age” By Kranti Kumara and Keith Jones, September 2006
(7).Decision Points, Autobiography by G.W Bush.
(8).Newsweek magazine, 5 November 2001, Washington
|