Search
 
Write
 
Forums
 
Login
"Let there arise out of you a band of people inviting to all that is good enjoining what is right and forbidding what is wrong; they are the ones to attain felicity".
(surah Al-Imran,ayat-104)
Image Not found for user
User Name: Noman
Full Name: Noman Zafar
User since: 1/Jan/2007
No Of voices: 2195
 
 Views: 1756   
 Replies: 1   
 Share with Friend  
 Post Comment  
COMMENTARY
Mr. Erdogan's Turkey
By MICHAEL RUBIN
October 19, 2006; Page A18

Five years into the war on terror, inept U.S. diplomacy risks undercutting a key democracy (and ally) that President Bush once called a model for the Muslim world. The future of Turkey as a secular, Western-oriented state is at risk. Just as in Gaza and Lebanon, the threat comes from parties using the rhetoric of democracy to advance distinctly undemocratic agendas. Turkey has overcome past challenges from terrorism and radical Islam; always its system has persevered. But now, as Turkish politicians and officials work to defend the Turkish constitution, U.S. diplomats interfere to dismiss Turkish concerns and downplay the Islamist threat.
A crisis has simmered for months, but earlier this month Ankara erupted. On Oct. 1, President Ahmet Necdet Sezer warned parliament, "The fundamentalist threat has not changed its goal to change the basic characteristics of the state." The next day, as Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan visited the Oval Office, Gen. Yasar Büyükanit, chief of Turkey's armed forces, warned cadets of growing Islamic fundamentalism and promised "every measure will be taken against it." Usually such warnings are enough to keep those transgressing on the constitutional separation of mosque and state in check.
[Turkey]
Enter U.S. Ambassador Ross Wilson. At an Oct. 4 press conference he said: "There is nothing that worries me with regards to Turkey's continuation as a strong, secure, stable and secular democracy." He dismissed opposition concern about the Islamism of Mr. Erdogan's ruling Justice and Development Party (known in Turkish as the AKP) as "political cacophony." His remarks were consistent with those of his State Department superiors. Last autumn, Daniel Fried, assistant secretary of state for European Affairs, said "The development of the AKP into a democratic party . . . has mirrored and supported the development of Turkish political society as a whole in a liberal and democratic direction." He described the AKP as "a kind of Muslim version of a Christian Democratic Party."
Why are so many Turks angry at Washington's dismissal of their concerns? While democrats fight for change within a system, Islamists seek to alter the system itself. This has been the case with the AKP. Over the party's four-year tenure, Mr. Erdogan has spoken of democracy, tolerance and liberalism, but waged a slow and steady assault on the system. He endorsed, for example, the dream of Turkey's secular elite to enter the European Union, but only to embrace reforms diluting the checks and balances of military constitutional enforcement. After the European Court of Human Rights upheld a ban on headscarves in public schools, he changed course. "It is wrong that those who have no connection to this field [of religion] make such a decision . . . without consulting Islamic scholars," he declared. Then in May 2006, his chief negotiator for accession talks ordered the removal, from a negotiating paper, of reference to Turkey's educational system as secular.
The assault on the secular education system has been subtle but effective. Traditionally, students had three choices: enroll at religious academies (so-called Imam Hatips) and enter the clergy; learn a trade at vocational schools; or matriculate at secular high schools, attend university and pursue a career. Mr. Erdogan changed the system: By equating Imam Hatip degrees with high-school degrees, he enabled Islamist students to enter university and qualify for government jobs without ever mastering Western fundamentals. He also sought to bypass checks and balances. After the Higher Education Board composed of university rectors rejected his demands to make universities more welcoming of political Islam, the AKP-dominated parliament proposed to establish 15 new universities. While Mr. Erdogan told diplomats his goal was to promote education, Turkish academics say the move would enable him to handpick rectors and swamp the board with political henchmen.
Such tactics have become commonplace. At Mr. Erdogan's insistence and over the objections of many secularists, the AKP passed legislation to lower the mandatory retirement age of technocrats. This could mean replacement of nearly 4,000 out of 9,000 judges. Turks are suspicious that the AKP seeks to curtail judicial independence. In May 2005, AKP Parliamentary Speaker Bülent Arinç warned that the AKP might abolish the constitutional court if its judges continued to hamper its legislation. Mr. Erdogan's refusal to implement Supreme Court decisions levied against his government underline his contempt for rule of law. Last May, in the heat of the AKP's anti-judiciary rhetoric, an Islamist lawyer protesting the head scarf ban shouted "Allahu Akbar," opened fire in the Supreme Court and murdered a judge. Thousands attended his funeral, chanting pro-secular slogans. Mr. Erdogan was absent from the ceremony.
There have been other subtle changes. Mr. Erdogan has replaced nearly every member of the banking regulatory board with officials from the Islamic banking sector. Accusations of Saudi capital subsidizing AKP are rampant. According to Turkish Central Bank statistics, in the first six months of this year, the net error -- money entering the Turkish economy for which regulators cannot account -- has increased almost eightfold compared to 2002, the year the AKP came to power. According to the opposition parliamentary bloc, debt amassed under Mr. Erdogan's administration is equal to total debt accrued in Turkey between 1970 and 2000. Erkan Mumcu, a former AKP minister who now heads the center-right Motherland Party, accused the AKP in June of interfering in Central Bank operations. Accordingly, President Bush's Oval Office statement, based on State Department talking points -- congratulating "the prime minister and his government for the economic reforms that have enabled the Turkish economy to be strong" -- may have hampered transparency, if not reform.
In the past year, the AKP anti-secular agenda has grown bolder. AKP-run municipalities now ban alcohol. Turkish Airlines recently surveyed employees about their attitudes toward the Quran. On July 11, Mr. Erdogan publicly vouched for the sincerity of Yasin al-Qadi, a Saudi financier identified by both the U.N. and U.S. Treasury Department as an al Qaeda financier.
When Mr. Erdogan began his political career, he did not hide his agenda. In September 1994, while mayor of Istanbul, he promised, "We will turn all our schools into Imam Hatips." Two months later he said, "Thank God Almighty, I am a servant of the Shariah." In May 1996, he called for a ban on alcohol. In the months before his dismissal from the mayoralty, his cynicism was clear. "Democracy is like a streetcar," he quipped. "You ride it until you arrive at your destination and then you step off."
Diplomacy should not just accentuate the positive and ignore the negative. When a country faces an Islamist challenge, PC platitudes do far more harm than good. At the very least, U.S. diplomats should never intercede to preserve the status quo at the expense of liberalism. Nor should they even appear to endorse a political party as an established democracy enters an election season. It is not good relations with Ankara that should be the U.S. goal, but rather the triumph of the democratic and liberal ideas for which Turkey traditionally stands.
Mr. Rubin is a resident scholar at the American Enterprise Institute.
  URL for this article:
http://online. wsj.com/article/ SB11612169077649 7100.html
 Reply:   Turkish Tiger
Replied by(Noman) Replied on (22/Oct/2006)
Turkey's boisterous democracy stands out in the Islamic world. But the country is unique in another way, as a thriving Muslim market economy with -- and here's the crucial distinction with,
EDITORIAL BOARD
Turkish Tiger
By MATTHEW KAMINSKI
October 21, 2006; Page A8

 
ISTANBUL -- Turkey's boisterous democracy stands out in the Islamic world. But the country is unique in another way, as a thriving Muslim market economy with -- and here's the crucial distinction with, say, a Malaysia -- a large, independent private sector and a shrinking state. In debates over how to change the Middle East, market reform tends to take a backseat to party building or free elections. Maybe, as Turkey shows, we're putting the cart before the horse.
The recent troubling news here, from Kurdish terrorism to the rise of political Islam and anti-Americanism to tensions with Europe, can't take away from Turkey's economic renaissance. New and old industries powered a 7% expansion in 2005, the fourth consecutive year that growth approached double digits; this year, it'll be around 5%. Inflation, an old Turkish non-delight, is under control. Inside the European Union's free-trade area since 1996, Turkey has done especially well with export-driven manufacturing. More than half of Europe's television sets are made here. Investors are taking notice; Citigroup this week bought 20% of the second-largest Turkish bank for $3.1 billion. Though the economic gap with Europe remains wide, Turks are spending their way to bourgeois respectability, buying, in the past year, $3.5 billion in imported cars. Consumer loans are up 120% in that time, housing 300%.
[Editorial Board]
The change is as striking in beguiling Istanbul, the commercial capital, as in the conservative, once predominantly agricultural, hinterlands of Anatolia, whose new breed of manufacturing tycoons are nicknamed "Islamic Calvinists" by a local think tank. "It's a party," says Nedim Esgin, who spent two decades as a senior executive at Turkey's largest industrial group, Koç, before going into business on his own.
It wasn't always so. Kemal Atatürk's Turkish Republic started life in 1923 with the same handicaps as its former Arab Ottoman colonies: virtually no industrial base and a tiny commercial class. "What distinguishes Turkey is that it developed a private sector in the post-Ottoman period," says Sevket Pamuk, a prominent Turkish economic historian. (His younger brother, Orhan, won the Nobel for literature last week.) "That was not true in the Near East." In eight decades of Kemalist Turkey, he adds, the rise of a strong business class was "the key to democracy." Its Arab neighbors opted for statist policies and political structures, where, in Mr. Pamuk's words, "state industries became family enterprises. "
Corruption and poor governance, three military coups in a span of 20 years, and financial crises -- most recently and dramatically five years ago -- kept Turkish democracy and capitalism from fully maturing. Until 2001, Turkey held the dubious distinction of being the only country that ran 50% or higher inflation for more than two decades. But the traumatic 2001 crisis forced the then-government to clean up the banks and rein in budget deficits. A year later Recep Tayyip Erdogan, best known abroad for his roots in Turkey's Islamist movement, broke another pattern, of unstable politics, by winning commanding control of parliament for his Justice and Development Party.
To the question of whether Islam hinders development, Mr. Erdogan offers one answer: On the economy this "Islamist" government has stuck to the market playbook. The budget deficit is 1% of GDP, down from 16% in 2001; the debt-to-GDP ratio 60%, compared with 110% five years ago. Inflation is creeping up, to 10%, after hot money fled emerging markets early this summer and the lira fell 22% against the dollar at one point; but Turkey weathered that brief storm well. The Islamists have embarked on the most far-reaching privatization program in Turkish history, selling off telephone companies, petrochemical plants and steel makers and lowering barriers to foreign investment -- with little opposition. A vestige of state control, dating back to Ottoman times, is its ownership of large tracts of land, but that, too, is on the agenda.
As mayor of Istanbul, Mr. Erdogan worked closely with and gained the trust of the city's business class. He was also, unusually for a Turkish politician, a businessman himself, having run a food-distribution franchise. He came into office "with a free-enterprise mindset," says Mr. Esgin, who's not otherwise complimentary. "This is the most economically liberal government Turkey has had." Voters like the new prosperity. "Elections are now about the economy, not ideology," says Murat Gulkan, at Deutsche Bank.
The good times have made for a richer civil society. Since the last military-led regime in 1980-83, notes author Hugh Pope, 27 private universities have been founded, mostly courtesy of tycoons like the Koç and Sabanci families. Sabanci University's art gallery last year put on a popular Picasso exhibit, a first in Istanbul; Rodin followed this summer. Associations and lobby groups are mushrooming; they are giving voice to competing interests and providing counterweights to the Islamists in charge, even as opposition parties remain weak. Turkish democracy has never been stronger.
There is another face to this government and, unusually for modern Turkey, it's a distinctly Middle Eastern one. It includes Mr. Erdogan's Islamic social agenda, such as his push to lift the ban against women wearing head scarves in public buildings. His prickly foreign policy, which no longer prizes the American alliance above all, breaks with Atatürk's strict secularism and pro-Western bent.
While Mr. Erdogan's conservative social policies resonate with a large chunk of the electorate, they leave many Europeanized Turks anxious about their personal freedoms. It's not out of the question that the military, traditional guardian of the Kemalist secular order, may step in again and put an end to this democratic experiment. Europe has been an anchor for Turkish reform, and the recent strains with the EU that brought talks on membership to a virtual halt in recent weeks bring another risk of relapse.
But economic pluralism has entrenched political pluralism, and freedoms, in ways that will be hard to displace. Turkey's neighbors, and America's democracy pushers, please take note.
  URL for this article:
http://online. wsj.com/article/ SB11613890583089 9627.html

 
Please send your suggestion/submission to webmaster@makePakistanBetter.com
Long Live Islam and Pakistan
Site is best viewed at 1280*800 resolution