|
US court declares Aafia guilty |
|
Updated at: 2440 PST, Thursday, February 04, 2010 |
|
NEW YORK: US Court Wednesday held Dr Aafia Siddiqui--a US-educated Pakistani woman as guilty of trying to kill American servicemen in Afghanistan.
According to Geo News, the court declared its verdict on Dr Siddiqui at 2pm (local time).
Aafia Siddiqui, 37, a neuroscientist trained at the prestigious Massachusetts Institute of Technology, was found guilty on all charges by a jury in federal court.
She was accused of being a would-be terrorist who in July 2008 grabbed a rifle at an Afghan police station where she was being interrogated and tried to gun down a group of US servicemen.
Dr Aafia was present at the time of the verdict. She listened to the verdict with great fortitude. Also, her brother was present on the occasion. |
Aafia lawyers reject court’s ruling Updated at: 0805 PST, Thursday, February 04, 2010 NEW YORK: The lawyers of Dr Aafia Siddiqui, who has been convicted in a US court, refused to accept the verdict against the US-educated girl.
Siddiqui, a tiny, frail woman dressed in a beige tunic and white headscarf covering her mouth and forehead, showed no emotion as the jury pronounced its verdict.
After the verdict, outside the courthouse, Elaine Sharp, one of Siddiqui's lawyers said the jury came to the wrong conclusion.
Siddiqui was arrested by Afghan police on trumped-up charges, according to which she was carrying containers of chemicals and notes referring to mass-casualty attacks and New York landmarks.
She was not charged in connection with those materials and the charges she was convicted of do not mention terrorism.
Instead, the case centered on an incident the next day in the Afghan police compound, where U.S. soldiers and FBI agents sought to question her. The irony is that no sound evidences could be presented at the court to prove the false story at Bagram incident.
Siddiqui's defence attacked the government's version of events, saying there was no forensic evidence to support it.
Another of Siddiqui's defence attorneys, Charlie Swift, said there was no evidence the rifle had ever been fired, since no bullets, shell casings or bullet debris were recovered and no bullet holes detected.
Speaking to the many supporters of Siddiqui around the globe, Elaine Sharp called for a calm reaction to the guilty verdict.
Siddiqui faces a maximum sentence of life in prison and will be sentenced in May.
|