Hype over interim nuclear deal
Asif Haroon Raja
The interim nuclear deal signed between
Iran and P5 plus 1 in Geneva on November 24 has apparently defused the
explosive situation in Middle East. It has been widely hailed as the triumph of
diplomacy. President Hassan Rouhani and Foreign Minister Javed Zarif are being
applauded for their pragmatism and for averting a catastrophic war in the
making. High sounding names such as historic, momentous, landmark, and so on
and so forth are being subscribed to the deal. The fact of the matter is that
it was not diplomacy but application of sustained coercive and bullying tactics
coupled with covert operations by USA and its allies that paved the way for the
so-called momentous deal.
The deal could not have materialized
without the regime change in Tehran. President Hassan Rouhani who replaced
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad after elections in Iran in last June and took office in
August with the help of US backed reformists and centrists has set the ball
rolling by coming to terms with the great powers. He chose to make the decade
long inflexible stance on nuclear program more flexible by offering a compromise
formula to USA, China, Russia and western powers. His government arrived at
this decision after deliberating that policy of confrontation has not only
isolated Iran internationally but has also seriously impacted its economy and
in turn added to the hardships of the people.
Rouhani’s ‘heroic flexibility’ was
welcomed by world powers and both sides have in principle agreed to follow the
path of accommodation and reconciliation. The US has reciprocated despite
serious concerns of its allies because of its own multiple woes. Its adventures
in Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya have boomeranged and it had to grudgingly unload
Tomahawk cruise missiles poised to strike Syria. While its economy is in
crisis, it has yet not been able to create conducive conditions for safe exit
of US-NATO forces from Afghanistan. Talk of China or France replacing USA in
the foreseeable future is in the air. Under the circumstances, the US can
ill-afford to open up another dangerous front.
Efforts to make a diplomatic breakthrough had
been going on for over a year and Burns, Sullivan, Wendy Sherman and John Kerry
were the negotiators behind the scenes while Oman’s Sultan Qaboos was the
mediator. Talks were kept secret even from closest allies including Israel and
Saudi Arabia as late as end September 2013. The only hindrance was hardliner
Ahmadinejad, who was pushed aside and reform-minded Rouhani brought
in.
The ice has begun to melt rapidly after 34
years long standoff. The wall of distrust built over these years will not fade
away in a jiffy magically, but will take time to revert to normality. To term
the deal as landmark and historic may be over optimistic and premature. There
are still far too many slips between the cup and the lip. With so many spoilers
lurking around and looking for opportunities to sabotage the deal, anything can
happen in the next six months. Until the finalization of the deal which is
condition based, all concerned should act more prudently and keep their fingers
crossed and pray for a better outcome. Obama administration cannot overlook the
nuisance value of Congress, Jewish American lobby and Israel and also cannot
afford to annoy Saudi Arabia. Unsatisfied with the nuclear freeze, Israel and
Congress want to deny Iran the enrichment right for peaceful purposes as well.
It is worth pondering over as to why the
US under Obama constantly tried to woo Iran from 2009 onwards and within two
months of Rouhani’s takeover, signed the interim deal. It must not be forgotten
that Iran is one of the most hydro-carbon-rich country of the world. It is 4th
largest oil producing country and its gas reserves are 2nd largest
in the world. Geo-strategically, it sits at the mouth of Strait of Hormuz,
which is one of the busiest shipping routes and is used by 40% of world’s
tankers. If closed, price of crude oil will jump up sky high. Iran’s proven oil
and gas reserves give Iran a unique status in the global energy supply. Iran
under Reza Shah had devotedly served the interests of USA, west and Israel by
acting as the policeman of the Persian Gulf. Owing to its robust economy, Iran
could sustain the eight year war with Iraq and prolonged economic sanctions.
Economic factor played an important role in keeping the nation motivated and
united and in producing effective leaders.
Although sanctions have badly hit oil
production capacity of Iran, however, correspondingly it has shot up oil prices
in the international market. With the easing of sanctions on oil investment and
trade, oil prices would come down. Oil and gas are the two most important items
vitally needed to run the industries of the west and of Japan. The US started
the global war on terror with the hidden objective of stealing mineral
resources of the Muslim world. Thaw with Iran has brightened the scope of western
oil and gas barons to acquire contracts for upliftings Iran’s aging gas and oil
fields or to explore new ones.
What is important to note is that the
Iranians stood behind all their leaders from Imam Khomeini onwards who had
adopted the policy of strategic defiance and managed to complete the cycle of
Islamic revolution despite Iran being declared a pariah State. Eight-year war
in which Iraq was supported by the two super powers, the west and Arab world
was fought by Iran single-handed. After every prayer in mosques, Iranians would
shout slogans of death to USA and Israel. Hezbollah in Lebanon was supported by
Iran to bridle unchecked belligerence of Israel. While the Arabs ignored
beleaguered Hamas protecting Gaza Strip from Israeli aggression, Iran aided
them. Iranians have now backed the modified stance of Rouhani, and Iran’s
supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has supported the deal. There is no cry
of sellout.
Example of Iranian leadership’s defiance
is often quoted to shame our pliant leaders with feet of clay perpetually
remaining under the magic spell of USA. After destruction and occupation of
Afghanistan and Iraq, nobody was sure which country will be the next target of
USA. Opinions varied whether it will be nuclear Pakistan or potential nuclear
Iran. Those categorizing Pakistan as number one target argued that it would be
easier for the US to deal with a divided nation led by weak leadership and
fragile economy. Now that Iran has been struck off the list of target
countries, Pakistan’s vulnerability has increased manifold.
But the big question is why a Muslim
country with nuclear or chemical capability is dubbed as a danger to world
peace and why not Israel and India, or the P5 sitting on huge stockpiles of
nuclear and chemical bombs. Israel has remained the blue-eyed boy of USA
despite its evil doings since its illegal creation in 1948 at the cost of
Palestinians. USA and other western powers secretly helped Israel in becoming a
nuclear power. Israel is still holding on to Golan Heights and West Bank
occupied in 1967 and has quarantined Gaza Strip and is continuing with its
forward settlement policy. India’s strategic alliance with former USSR from
1947 to 1991 and its gross human rights violations in occupied Kashmir and
against all other minorities in India were ignored and she was embraced by USA
and made a strategic partner in 1991. Instead of disabling her weaponized
nuclear program and putting a check on her continuously growing conventional
military power, the same are being further bolstered by USA.
Iraq’s nuclear plant at Osirik was
destroyed by Israeli jets in early 1980s. In order to humble Saddam, Iraq was
put under cruel sanctions in 1992 after the first Gulf War, which resulted in
deaths of 500,000 Iraqi children. Afghanistan was plastered and occupied in
2001 on the pretext that it had sheltered Osama bin Laden, allegedly involved
in 9/11 attacks. No proofs have been provided about al-Qaeda’s
involvement. Iraq was destroyed and occupied in 2003 on a false pretext
that it had WMDs. Libya under Qaddafi was befriended but after extracting its
nuclear teeth, the regime was axed and populist Qaddafi killed. UN weapon
inspectors are busy disarming Syria of its chemical weapons, which it had
gathered to save itself from expansionist Israel. Now Iran has been hugged
after three decades of acute hostility, but at the cost of its nuclear program
since it is a Muslim country. The primary aim of the US led west, Israel and
India is to keep the Muslim countries disarmed and neo-colonized.
Pakistan has been repeatedly betrayed
despite the fact that it faithfully served US interests and never picked up
courage to defy US illegal commands. Its declared nuclear program, meeting
international standards of safety, has become an eyesore for USA, the west,
Israel and India. Will a thaw in Pak-US relations similar to the one with
Iran take place without compromising our nuclear capability? Until and unless
Pakistan stands on its own feet and makes its economy robust, it cannot earn respect
from the world comity.
|