Search
 
Write
 
Forums
 
Login
"Let there arise out of you a band of people inviting to all that is good enjoining what is right and forbidding what is wrong; they are the ones to attain felicity".
(surah Al-Imran,ayat-104)
Image Not found for user
User Name: International_Professor
Full Name: International Professor
User since: 22/Jan/2008
No Of voices: 353
 
 Views: 5304   
 Replies: 2   
 Share with Friend  
 Post Comment  

Fatwa of Tahir Qadri – reincarnation of Rasputin -Part II

By: Earthman, International Professor

We have discussed earlier that Tahir Qadri is a swindler and convict by High Courts, Lahore Pakistan with the remarks that he is fraud and liar, moreover he is Shia and hides his Shia faith and uses “Taqqia” (pious fraud or subterfuge) to make fool to majority of the population. However none of Shia scholar has been found in support of his fatwa. The person with such mongrel believes is called Rafzi or Tafzeeli. Furthermore he is using word Sufi as name board otherwise he is worldly person and keeps properties around the globe. He has stolen the title of Sheikh ul Islam from other prominent Muslim scholars.

Tahir Qadri a reincarnation of Rasputin:

Rasputin was a Russian Sufi (Mystic) during Tsar (Zar) Nicholas ii era, which also influenced his wife Tsaritsa Alexendra, same like Tahir Qadri is using name of Benazir. Nick name of Rasputin was “Mad Monk” where as Tahir Qadri is known as “Thug of Baghdad”. Qadri has derived the title of Sheikh ul Islam from word “Starets or Strannik” the title of Rasputin, meaning spiritual father, elder (Sheikh) in Russian Orthodox Church. Qadri was born same as Rasputin in a small town of Jhang at the home of a peasant near Chenab River, whereas Rasputin born along Tura River at a home of peasant.

Rasputin experienced vision of Mother of God, contacted Christian sect known as Khlysty (flagellants), peoples say that religious and sexual ecstasy were combined in their rituals. Later Rasputin visited a holy man named Makariy. Journey of Qadri followed same footsteps of Rasputin, he says that Holy Prophet visited and made him in charge of Pakistani Mullahs and in the meanwhile he imported one Mullah from Baghdad, declared him saint and his grave is still adjacent to his Minhaj Muddersah (school) at Lahore.

Rasputin spoke of salvation depending less on church and seeking the spirit of God within, and he was deeply oppose to war (Jihad), attaining divine grace through sin have been main secret doctrine which Rasputin preached in his inner circle of women. To compare the life style of Rasputin with Qadri, try to watch movie “Rasputin, the mad monk”, “Hell Boy” and many other documentaries etc. in each case appearance of Rasputin is very well identical with Qadri, and since he started to wear a cap resembling Orthodox priests, he really looks like a character of old Baghdad, in stories like “Alif Laila”, “Thieves of Baghdad” or “Ali Baba forty thieves” etc. Soon after wearing same Russian style Baghdadi cap with his small round owl eyes really looks like comedian. A favourite character of Russian TV and since his fraudulent Fatwa he is continuously on screen of RT. There are many other resemblances between two Sufi’s, Rasputin and Qadri, but due to shortage of space see next time.

However like Rasputin he stages drama of peoples kissing to his feet and hands. Moreover he recorded movies of peoples prostrating to him like God, kneel down and licking him like dog etc. Some of his videos are available on You Tube or many websites. We have seen in some movies or any book that Rasputin intentionally spilled the leftover glass of water on the table, and his Mureed (followrs) ladies rushed to lick water with their tongues. Qadri has also employed local and imported women at Lahore to show him as modern Mullah or secular Mullah.

A famous drama of Tahir Qadri:

Following text I have copied from a blog of website:

“I remember this Fraud ul Qadri who claimed he saw the Holy Prophet and hung out with him.

The Holy Prophet asked the Holy Leader Tahir Qadri for a piece of white paper. When Tahir Qadri brought it, the Holy Prophet wrote some statements on it with his own holy Parker pen. The Prophet made a certificate, printed, signed it and stamped it and then told Tahir Qadri: "You have my certificate and my “Basharat for Jannat” (Guaranteed certification for Paradise with 72 women) is for everyone who plants a seed in your nursery" Then the Holy Prophet told the Moazzin (Prayer caller) to go away, so Tahir Qadri could call the Adhan (Call for prayers).

Then everybody left but the Prophet did not come out. Tahir Qadri sees the Holy Prophet lying on the bed while he (Prophet) looked at Tahir Qadri and smiled and said: "I came to Pakistan because the Moulvis (clergy) of Pakistan and its Madrassas (religious schools) invited me. But they did not treat me well and disrespected me.

According to Qadri the Holy Prophet said: Meri maizbani nahi ki, me naraz hoon. They have hurt me and I have decided to leave Pakistan and go back to Saudi Arabia. That's why I didn't meet anybody in Pakistan. Tahir Qadri kisses the feet of the Holy Prophet and cries and begs him to not to leave Pakistan. (In back ground audio and on video everybody in the audience is crying, lamenting and weeping with loud voice by now") The Prophet says: "Ahl-e-Pakistan ne mujhe bulaya aur phir meri izzat nahi ki (Peoples of Pakistan invited me and disrespected me).

Mujhe bohat dukh diye (Tahir Qadri pretends to cry with sound. Shake, tremble and whoops). Finally, the Prophet relents and smiles and says: "Tahir Qadri if you want me to stay in Pakistan, I have one condition. My condition is this: Mr. Tahir, if you promise me that you will be my host, I will promise to stay in Pakistan.

The Holy Prophet continues: "I will stay in Pakistan for 7 more days. Mr. Tahir, you will arrange my 5 star accommodations, my meals at the hotel (KFC or MacDonald) and “When I will return to Madina, Saudi Arabia, Mr. Tahir Qadri You will buy me a first class plane ticket”. Then the Holy Prophet said:  "Tahir, start your institution Minhajul Quran. I promise I will attend your lectures. For reference please watch following videos.

Fraud ul Qadri Jhoota Khwab: Part 1: www.youtube.com/watch?v=TESiWp6m0po

And Part 2: www.youtube.com/watch?v=CzuIc_UFjXY&feature=related

Martyrdom (Shaheed):

Tahir Qadri again failed to define martyrdom, and cleverly tricked with the word martyrdom. In the absence of definition of terrorism, Jihad and martyrdom how a comprehensive Fatwa could be issued. In fact his Fatwa is a fraud and not based on Islamic teachings of Quran to impact on the minds of opponents, and by filling the stomach of 600 pages does not mean that it bears any usefulness to the subject. For example if anybody would decide to write a book and would quote references of 174 relevant and irrelevant books than it could be an encyclopaedia of 3000 pages without any essence of the subject.

Tahir Qadri an agent of Imperialism? Munafiq or Murtid?

According to definition of Ayatollah Khomeini who believed that "agents of imperialism" (secular pro-Western Muslims), were "busy in every corner of the Islamic world drawing our youth away from us with their evil propaganda Muslims at find evidence of "the primary conspiracy against Islam … not [in] Bush and Blair," but in "the enemy which lurks within the Ummah. The most poisonous and lethal enemy for Islam in this century consists of the Munafiqeen (hypocrites) and Murtadeen (apostates) who are concealing within the folds of the Ummah," but "products of Kuffar universities …." and have cast doubt on traditional interpretations of the Sharia (Islamic law).

Tahir Qadri in the light of Quran:

O Prophet, when the hypocrites come to you, they say, "We bear witness that you are indeed Allah's Messenger." Yes, Allah knows that you are indeed His Messenger, but Allah bars witness that these Hypocrites are utter liars. (63:1)

So they hinder themselves and others from the Way of Allah. Evil indeed are the deeds that they do. (63:2). this is because they believed and then they disbelieved. Therefore, a seal has been set on their hearts, and so they do not understand anything. (63:3)

And when you see them, their figures would look marvellous; when they speak you would love to listen to what they say. But in reality they are like blocks of timber propped up against a wall. They deem every shout to be directed against them. They are the real enemies, so beware of them. May Allah destroy them! How are they being perverted? (63:4) Allah does not guide the transgressors. (63:6)

Allah has sealed up their hearts and ears and a covering has fallen over their eyes, and they have incurred the severest punishment. (2:7) they are deaf; they are dumb; they are blind so they will not return (to the right way). (2:18)

Hell fire is waiting for Tahir Qadri?

They are the people who have bartered away Guidance for error and Allah's pardon for His punishment. How audacious they are: they are ready even to endure the fire of Hell. This was in spite of the fact that Allah had sent down the Book with the Truth but the people who sought differences in the Book swerved far away from the Truth in their disputes. (2: 175-176)

A note by Enver Masood about Fitna e Tahir Qadri:

First, what is terrorism? The UN High-level Panel on Threats, Challenges and Change defines terrorism as "any action intended to cause death or serious bodily harm to civilians or non-combatants with the purpose of intimidating a population or compelling a government or an international organization to do, or abstain from, any act."  According to Webster's New World Dictionary -- the Second College Edition, terrorism is defined as "use of force or threats to demoralize, intimidate, and subjugate, esp. such use as a political weapon or policy." This often equates with power politics and realpolitik.
Second, who is a terrorist and who is a freedom fighter? To cite an often repeated cliché: one man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter. The passage of time may cause us to change our opinion of them. We have only to consider the labels applied over time to Nelson Mandela, the "terrorist" and recipient of the Nobel Peace Prize (1993); Yasser Arafat, the "terrorist" and recipient of the Nobel Peace Prize (1994); and America's founding fathers -- terrorists in the eyes of the British, freedom fighters in the eyes of Americans.
Third, who is a civilian?  The U.S. troops in Iraq are supported by an army of civilian contractors who provide security, bring them fuel, food, etc., and provide other services. The U.S. occupation of Iraq is overseen, and supported, by the largest U.S. embassy in the world many of whom carry out intelligence activities. Are these civilians or legitimate targets for the Iraqi resistance?
Israel presents a different issue. Except for religious scholars who are exempt, Israelis are drafted into the Israel Defence Force at age 18. Men serve for three years, women for 21 months. Upon completion of compulsory service each soldier is assigned to a reserve unit. Are these reservists, who change from military uniform to civilian clothes in the same day, civilians or military targets? In the past, intelligence agencies are reported to have infiltrated consulting firms, charitable organizations, news services, student groups, etc.
Fourth, what about the rights of citizens of an occupied country? Under international law, citizens of an occupied country have the legal right to resist occupation by any and all means. Indeed history records with favour the French resistance that fought against Nazi occupation. Are those who collaborate with occupation forces a legitimate target for the resistance? Does the right to resist occupation grant authority to attack Israeli settlers in occupied Palestine?
An Italian judge ruled in April this year that "militants who attack military or state targets, even with suicide bombers, cannot be considered terrorists in times of war or occupation."
Fifth, what about state-sponsored acts of violence? Former Supreme Court Justice Robert Jackson, chief U.S. prosecutor at the first Nuremberg trial, called waging aggressive war "the supreme international crime” differing only from other war crimes in that it contains within itself the accumulated evil of the whole." "The same view would later be confirmed by the International Criminal Tribunal for the Far East. It was also confirmed in the detailed judgment in the 'Ministries Case' of the Subsequent Proceedings held at Nuremberg" wrote Benjamin B. Ferencz -- a prosecutor at the subsequent Nuremberg war crimes trials. Does the fatwa apply to Russia's war on the Chechens, China's repression of the Uighurs, the Philippines' war on the Moros of Mindanao, and the U.S. invasion of Iraq -- the supreme international crime?
And what does the fatwa say about the U.S. invasion of Iraq? In his Nobel lecture, Harold A. Pinter, recipient of the 2005 Nobel Prize for literature, called it "an act of blatant terrorism”. Click for full article: (Aljazeera) (3).

Crusade against Jihad and Crusade of George W. Bush: On September 16, 2001 George W. Bush referred to the war in Afghanistan as a Crusade: "This crusade, this war on terrorism is going to take a while. And the American people must be patient. I'm going to be patient. (1)

War on Terror: The War on Terror, Global War on Terror or War on Terrorism was invention of George w. Bush, the military, political, legal and ideological conflict with Muslims (or so called Islamic Terrorism or Islamic militants and regimes and organizations). Later it proved that it was mockery of neo-Cons. The Barak Obama administration has discontinued use of the term "War on Terror" and instead uses the term "Overseas Contingency Operation". However, President Obama has stated that the U.S. is at war with al-Qaeda (unfortunately nobody knows where Al Qaeda lives, it has no address and instead of Al Qaeda their target is Taliban). In 2005 the Security Council adopted resolution 1624 concerning incitement to commit acts of terrorism and the obligations of countries to comply with international human rights laws.(1) Although both resolutions require mandatory annual reports on counter-terrorism activities by adopting nations, the United States and Israel have both declined to submit reports.

Support of Quilliam foundation to Tahir Qadri:

The Quilliam foundation is run by extremists and fanatics like Ed Husain, Maajid Nawaz, Ed Jagger, Ghaffar Hussain and Fatima Mullick etc. Some claims to be ex. Terrorists and members of Hizb e Tehreer etc. Those all preach fanaticism; extremism and their some views are near to ex. Muslims. It is supported by British Government and financed with 1 million pounds. What would be the share of Tahir Qadri is not known at this stage, surely there is something wrong at the bottom that he chose to London as a base for propaganda purposes.

Takfiri Ideology: The Quilliam foundation’s publications and lectures show that those usually talk about Takfir, and denounce Takfiri ideology. However it is surprising that same peoples have chosen Tahir Qadri for Takfiri purposes. Today Tahir Qadri is a Mullah supported by Imperialists and his Takfir doctrine has support of extremists, fanatics and Islamic Phobic’s. (Continued, see part iii)

References:

1.   George Bush’s crusade : http://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2001/09/20010916-2.html

2.    UN counter terrorism: http://www.un.org/sc/ctc/

3.   http://www.aljazeerah.info/Opinion%20Editorials/2010/March/8%20o/How%20Does%20Muhammad%20Tahir-ul-Qadri's%20Anti-terror%20Fatwa%20Define%20Terrorism%20By%20Enver%20Masud.htm

 

Click for Tahir Qadri Fatwa – Part 1

http://makepakistanbetter.com/why_how_what_forum.asp?GroupID=5&Group_title=Pakistan&ArticleID=9569

http://www.chowk.com/ilogs/76771/47752

 

 Reply:   A Good Article! INFACT AN ARTICLE THAT REQUIRES ATTENTION!
Replied by(kamranahmed_05) Replied on (18/Mar/2010)

Salam! One of my brothers in his reply asked to ignore this stupid article. But I think it is a good article bringing awareness to our muslim brothers n sisters. Tahir ul Qadri, like Ghamdi, gives "IMMATURE" (but "EMOTIONAL") interpretations of Holy Quran. There is nothing wrong with emotional speech (infact, it is good if someone gets benefit from it), BUT giving such speech without proper knowledge and references is quite misleading. A man without any sufficient knowledge of islam may find these speeches helpful, But for others these are just "bluffs"( just like some of our maulvis do). Secondly, this man miserably made objections on other scholars and scolded many of them who according to me have better propagated Islam. He even translates the meanings of arabic words (used in the Holy Quran) wrongly, this u can see ur-self if u know arabic.
 
 Reply:   Disappointing article
Replied by(rafiq) Replied on (17/Mar/2010)

Ignore this stupid article. The ignoramus retard who wrote it clearly doesn't know what he is talking about. What drugs were you on when writing this? I am prepared to debate any of the objections you have made of Shaykh-ul-Islam Dr Muhammad Tahir-ul-Qadri unless you are a spinless worm.
 
Please send your suggestion/submission to webmaster@makePakistanBetter.com
Long Live Islam and Pakistan
Site is best viewed at 1280*800 resolution