Jammu Kashmir Cannot be Divided!

A Sovereign Kashmir: Random Thoughts-136

-Dr. Abdul Ruff

---------------------------

A major policy of India, the former Non-Aligned leaders and now a noted colonial terror state, is to reap maximum benefits by hook or crook from anywhere, especially from the ongoing conflicts and terror wars. By supporting NATO terror syndicates in Afghanistan, India is eager to hook Washington through its lobbyists to replace Pakistan as a terror partner in the region to challenge China. India is also anxious about America's plans for Afghanistan and Washington's close ties with Pakistan – an extra base for NATO terror syndicates to clear energy routes from Central Asia.  But the US illegal occupation and state terror attacks threaten the region as well as world peace at large. The India-Pakistan nuclear rivalry remains dangerous. India would gain credibility and make the world safer if it worked harder to reduce tensions with Pakistan.

Upon considerable gains in external gimmicks, one of the latest foreign policy goals of India of late is to silence Pakistan and make Jammu Kashmir a non issue citing it soft repeat show that JK is an integral part of Indian Union. UN chief Ban kid Moon stated on 15 Nov that the Jammu Kashmir dispute remains on the UNSC's agenda and rejected the reports that suggested it had been removed from the list of unresolved issues and some articles on Kashmir are inaccurate. The latest, probably revised, list of matters the Security Council is seized with "continues to include the agenda item under which the council has taken up Kashmir, which, by a decision of the council, remains on the list for this year.

Supported mainly by Britain, a key Indian foreign policy objective is to influence all important sources like UN, ICC, ICJ, EU, USA that could create obstacles in Indian bid for UNSC and escalating terror operations in JK. It is to the advantage of colonial powers like India and Israel that all noted global state terror states are regrouping under the NATO  gang and are coming together by using UN and UNSC as forums to advance their colonialist, capitalist and imperialist agendas. Maybe as a gimmick to create frictions, on Nov 15, the UN just removed Jammu Kashmir from the UN list of unresolved disputes, which has come as a major setback to Kashmiris as well as Pakistan. The omission of Jammu and Kashmir from a list of disputes under the observation of the UN Security Council was noticed by Pakistan, whose envoy has lodged a protest.

While presenting the annual report to the 192-member assembly, British Ambassador Mark Loyal Grant had, possibly deliberately, not mentioned the Kashmir dispute in the context of unresolved long-running situations, despite the fact that it was included in the annual report. Pakistan's acting envoy to the UN Ajar Hussein B Sail said Jammu and Kashmir dispute was not mentioned in the context of unresolved long-running situations. While speaking at the UN General Assembly session, which was discussing the functioning and reform of the Security Council, he argued that this was an inadvertent omission, as JammuKashmir is one of the oldest disputes on agenda of the Security Council.

The agenda item entitled, 'India and Pakistan Question', which covers the Jammu Kashmir dispute, is duly mentioned in the annual report of the Security Council and is also present on its agenda. Pakistan's acting ambassador to the world body, Ajar Hussein Sail, in his speech to the General Assembly on November 12 had referred to the omission of Jammu and Kashmir dispute in a statement by the President of the Security Council, and not from its annual report, as reported in a section of the press. "We understand this was an inadvertent omission, as Jammu and Kashmir is one of the oldest disputes on the agenda of the Security Council," Sail had remarked after Grant's statement.

Whole idea of India harping on the JK being  an "integral part" issue is to prepare  enough ground for getting Jammu Kashmir removed from UN list of disputes as an occupied territory. But India failed, again. Pakistan, fighting for regaining the sovereignty for Kashmiris, has been asking the UN to intervene to help resolve the issue, but India has always maintained that it has to be resolved bilaterally between the two nations. A UN General Assembly session was organized by the UK that holds the presidency of the Security Council last month.

Earlier in October, Secretary-General Ban Kid-moon had said that the UN would not intervene in Kashmir issue until requested by both the parties-India and Pakistan. "As far as this role of good offices is concerned, the UN normally takes that initiative when requested by both parties concerned. India and Pakistan, they are neighboring countries, important nations in that region - peace and security would have important implications," he said. The UK reportedly repeated its support to see India on as a permanent member of the Security Council at the debate in the General Assembly.

Unfortunately, India has tactfully silenced UN chief. India officially bribes even the top world leaders, including UN chief with awards, honorary degrees and ready cash plus other “usual” benefits for services rendered to promoting Indian causes. Shameless Ban kid Moon, who intermittently talk about Indian horrors in JK, scruplessly accepted in New Delhi an award and “cash price” last year as part of package to support Indian cases in UN, especially on Jammu Kashmir and a seat on the notorious terrorist UNSC to safeguard its interests in JK and shield the state criminal from any possible punishments for their crimes against humanity in JK.

Meanwhile, Pakistan's Ambassador to the UN, Abdullah Hussein Harpoon, who was on a visit to Pakistan, said that there was no question of the Kashmir issue being dropped from the Security Council's agenda. The President of the Security Council, the Permanent Representative of the UK, is amply clear on the subject and is cognisant of the matter.  Pakistan's acting envoy to the UN Ajar Hussein B Sail said Jammu and Kashmir dispute was not mentioned in the context of unresolved long-running situations. We understand this was an inadvertent omission, as Jammu and Kashmir is one of the oldest disputes on agenda of the Security Council," while speaking at the UN General Assembly session, which was discussing the functioning and reform of the Security Council.

Resolution of  Kashmir issue remains the key  to peace in the region fo two nuclear powers, while USA is keen to stll the Pakistani nukes by playing "not doing enough" song. America claims to be a close ally of Pakistan, but US president ignored Islamabad I in his first trip to the region. US Obama talks about world peace and good relations with Muslims, but he only obliged New Delhi, an major enemy of Muslims, Kashmir and Pakistan, in not visiting Islamabad before coming to India. In India Obama’s real face got exposed. In spite of the fact that Obama denied permission to lobbyist for both Israel and India, both have somehow managed backdoor entry into the White House and get things done by using office of the top Indo-Israeli lobbyist Mrs. Clinton. Anti-Islamic media in USA promotes illicit ties with India and Israel – both are fascist states. They also say during Obama's tenure in the White House (since January 2009), India's relationship with the US has grown in various sectors, and has been described by Obama as a defining partnership of the 21st century.

A known mischievous hooker but pretending to be terror victim, India plays its terror ploy card well. No one has clearly declared the latest Indian mindset on the question of surrendering sovereignty of Jammu Kashmir back to Kashmiris. But a few Indian clamor the notion of giving back just the Kashmir region while India would keep the other two regions, Jammu and Laddakh, chiefly because those who struggle for freedom speak only about Kashmir, although the expression Kashmir embodies a collective meaning for the entire Jammu Kashmir.  Then the freedom leaders concentrate only on Kashmir region and do not expand their struggle to entire Jammu Kashmir, maybe because the pro-India leaders, as part of Indian scheme for division of JK into three parts – one for Kashmiris and two for India, do not encourage that.

Do the people from Jammu and Laddakh regions feel left out  by the JK freedom movement or are they being tactfully kept  away by India for reasons known only to them? ? Do the leaders of freedom movement take the automatic support of people form other regions, Jammu and Laddakh for granted when India and its agents in JK strenuously promoting anti-Kashmiris sentiments there for years now? As the top most leader of JK freedom movement, Geelani is in a position to answer this question and revise his policy if has not been pursuing all Jammu Kashmir freedom movement.

JammuKashmir is one whole and all three regions are parts of the whole.  There, India cannot have a role.