|
Ban Test Cricket!
-DR. ABDUL RUFF
-------------------
Whereas the NATO terror organization wants to justify its terrorism existence even after the end of Cold-war, the Test cricketers also are eager to sustain the fake cricketism to promote false individuals. The NATO and CIA re seen exceedingly interfering with sport outcomes. One example is denying an Iranian Muslim origin woman Tennis Ace and French citizen Aravane Rezai to play Tennis by asking her to wear dress against Islamic dress code. Tennis organization insists the women wear dress showing their thighs so that cameramen could focus on their under wears while jumping to hit balls. This is a part of anti-Islamic designs of the western terrocracies. Obviously, after their total failure to divide the Iranians like they have done in Libya, the CIA and NATO are trying to unleash anti-Islamic culture on international Muslim women players. These rouges organizations are now trying hard to push bogus cricket into Olympics!
As the most perfect format of relaxed joint cricket exercises, promoting batboys for special rewards, the Test cricket is one of the most unreliable bogus human sports played for specific purposes to promote mutually "give and take" principle to the advantage of the batboys to over-shine with 100 plus runs and handover their wickets to their favorite fielders. . .
Although Test cricket has lost its credibility and worth the mafias lid by India is deadly eager to keep test cricket at any cost as it offered enough runs to Indian batboys to claim national and other paid awards as well as nation’s black money. Time has already run out for the 5-day long funny Test cricket.
Apparently, cricket, when invented by British colonizers to promote its sport-entertainment to keep the colonies in good humors, began the test match as one innings affairs to promise their favorites to make sumptuous runs, but as time passed, batboys wanted to shine more and every one wanted a peace of cake in the form of 100 plus by rotation. Thus the Test cricket with two innings was born to boost the image of as many batboys as there are aspirants, pampered y regimes and mafia. Two innings gratly helped batboys, who for unknown reasons fall without getting 100 plus, to complete their "goal" in the second innings. So, in the ongoing Test between England and Sri Lanka also those batboys who could not make 100 pus are encouraged to make 100 plus in the second innings. English boys who failed in the first Test are incorporated in the Test-2 first innings. SL batboys who collapsed without "form", now in the Test-1 are offered enough runs by London boys. That is Test cricket for promotion of select individuals.
The test format is by nature prone to draws since the chief objective of the cricket is offer sumptuous runs to select batboys by rotation. As a result, bulk of test matches have ended in draw without any concern for the sponsoring nations. Worst part of the Test is the fictitious "man of the match" drama as if only an individual contributes to the victory of the team, although the post-paid commentators give special stress on partnerships of batboys" for better results even with bowler assistance.
The ODI that was discovered by the cricket mafias came after the Test again focused on runs of batyobys. And the T-20 and the its deformed IPl also followed the same pro-batboys patter. The IPL, played as JCE (joint cricket exercises) by all cricket frauds in India under auction. In fact, in order to offer enough runs to the batbvoys in 20-20 format, the bowlers offer Sixes and Fours without any rewards or recognition for their "services". Can you take t20/IPL seriously when the teams make, rather offered, more than 12 run rate when in other formats even 4 run-rate is more than enough? Nonsense is sense?
Today, thanks to open match-fixings in IPL, India has gained an upper hand in cricket by influencing all cricketers and teams to work for Indian cause. Other countries promote Indian cricket so that their cricketers are not punished by India-ICC. So much so, there are no honest cricketers, standard bowling, let alone decent genuine teams. Cricket is purely an entertainment with poor content.
One can say these cricket frauds, who thrive on extra profits and black money of capitalism, also promote socialism by offering good runs by rotation. Code mixing is so rampant in politics and sports that one must ignore all this as NATO gimmicks. .
Global cricket mafias (GCM) making sumptuous extra money by promoting new formats and versions of this funny entertainment called cricket. Side by side all efforts are taken to retain all old formats intact so that batboys and bowlers continue to fool the world by presenting fixed matches as genuine stuff.
Match fixing in cricket begins with the so-called “toss winning” which is totally farce because the teams must have already decided before hand in the previous night during the cocktail party and they just do the “formality” by asking a funny guy to spin the coin and another agent to “see” and say who is supposed to decide the bating. Supposing X is supposed to bat first, the toss winner would declare the intention accordingly. And the team which is bat first will bat first.
On May 26th Sri Lanka won the “toss” and elected to bat in the first test between Eng-SL in England for 5 long days immediately after the royal wedding and IPL drama directed by India-ICC-BCCI-IPL Mafia by casting international cricket frauds auctioned in black money by IPL bosses.
SL lost all 10 wickets for just 82 runs in about 2 hours in the second innings after they made 400 runs for 9 wickets in the first innings while host England could make 498 for 5 wickets. However, why the SL bowlers failed in the first innings and their batboys threw away their bats too early to lose with one full innings?
While the first innings the teams played what is known as “positive game” letting the batboys enjoy as much as they like until they hit the ball to their favorite fielder while bowlers and fielders are advised not to focus on wickets or target stumps- but just play pro-batboys game. As a result each team made goods runs with 100 plus and 200 plus exchanged sides. However, in the second innings troubled by the bogus rains the England began a negative bowling targeting stumps and LBW. England won the test surprisingly!.
SL batboys who were in full form in the first innings lost their "form" in the second innings, all of them in a row? Since in the first Test one English boy was offered 200 plus, now in the Test-2, it seems the SL boys wanted getting back that 200 plus from the hosts.
In the Test-2 began on June 03, SL removed Trot who made 200 plus in the Test-1 very early. So the rotation principle applies in Test. The Test-2, after batboys form both teams made sumptuous runs, the test ended in a draw but runs are not cancelled but man of match was awarded. For the draw?
The cricketers always find their own short cuts to change tactics to retain every format, including test cricket. In their hotels they discuss and decide how to p go about in the second innings so that spectators who play for watching mischief and the paid commentators are fooled generously do not suspect any of the fixings.
There should be scientific toss selection in stead of the one practiced now thus far providing the teams to decide to bat-first as per their night fixing. India mostly wins the toss by hook and always bats first only to score well with bowlers positive help and after that it bowls the other team in a reckless manner. In an emerging joint cricket exercises scenario led by India, other teams or individual cricketers being the parts of the drams do not protest
LBW is not a real wicket but only a speculative one and many bowlers use threat as a weapons when they want to remove batboys. Umpires at times do not accept LBW if they do not want to give away another wicket to a particular team. Since even experienced umpires are confused about LBW it is wise to either abandon LBW altogether or let the third umpires team to decide all wickets so that no revision is required.
True, one cannot expect sincerity or ingenuity in today's fixed cricket. Since bulks of spectators are largely crazy and fanatic people wanting their own team to sin somehow by hook or crook, the show keeps going on!
Whereas the NATO terror organization wants to justify its terrorism existence even after the end of Cold-war, the Test cricketers also are eager to sustain the fake cricketism to promote false individuals. The NATO and CIA re seen exceedingly interfering with sport outcomes. One example is denying an Iranian Muslim origin woman Tennis Ace and French citizen Aravane Rezai to play Tennis by asking her to wear dress against Islamic dress code. Tennis organization insists the women wear dress showing their thighs so that cameramen could focus on their under wears while jumping to hit balls. This is a part of anti-Islamic designs of the western terrocracies. Obviously, after their total failure to divide the Iranians like they have done in Libya, the CIA and NATO are trying to unleash anti-Islamic culture on international Muslim women players. These rouges organizations are now trying hard to push bogus cricket into Olympics!
|