|
Indo-UK Cricket Exchange Program?
-DR. ABDUL RUFF
--------------
Cricket, being played for years as a “give and taker” exchange program among youngsters of former British colonies, encourages open mischief and official manipulations. Since it promote and pampers a few select individuals as per the instruction from the federation of mafias, cricket matches cannot be real sport.
Cricketism and terrorism go hand in hand, protecting the interests of each other, very efficiently and generating enough black money, encouraging money laundering and creating select cricketers and setting bogus records.
Age of joint exercises in cricket has got yet another boost with India joining the English cricket bosses in presenting a ‘spectacular” show of cricket on the send day of the bogus Test-1 at Lords- the venue for 200th Test between the boss and assistant and 2000th test match on the lords ground.
Cricket gimmicks as misleading as political variates and Indian politicians also take keen interest in pampering bogus cricketers and make some profits for themselves.
When almost every cricket match is fixed well in advance for its “give and take” outcomes, such important “historic” match would not have been played just for fun and sheer entertainment.
bulk of Indians are now London as part of official free tour as part of trope to perform the Indo-UK joint cricket excesses for nearly 3 months. Indians India "won" the toss as the man who hurled the coin just looked at the fallen coin only inform Indian skipper that India has won the toss, but India decided to elect to bowl because of the very “critical pitch conditions”.
However, the bad pitch conditions were used well by the English boys to 50 plus and 200 plus and post a mammoth total of 470 plus.
India began bowling very seriously denying the not innocent looking English boys any chance of runs for several overs – in fact India was seen so strict that even three four consecutive overs were maiden. And two of English wickets fell cheap, including the skipper Strew and Cook who has the “records” of 7 100 plus, allowed by opponents, in recent months.
After 2 wickets, India let K. Petersen make 100 plus and also further allowed him to make 200 plus quickly. England's man of the moment Pietersen has, as one could expect, termed his double century as one of his best effort in “trying conditions”.
The question is not whether Indian bowlers and fielders failed to make English boys surrender meekly by a collapse of bating squad – not at all.
But, it is whether Petersen was the “elected” boy by India to offer 200 plus to mark the 200th Indo-England test match at the Lords, London. Petersens' first 200 plus gift from India.
In return India has got another record set for its bowler Praveen with a “maiden” 5 wickets.
English batboys and Indian bowlers have set records. In this way, so far, it is a win-win situation for both UK and its terror partner India.
But when India made English boys toil with their bats initially, English boys have been kind to Indian batboys by quickly offering runs on the Day2 at the Lords.
Indians think the English boys are obliged to offer at least 100 plus to one of its batboys, preferably to India’s "greatest historic man" Sachin Tendulakar, the wax boy of London Museum. Indian media, particularly the TV channels have already wished the most eligible Bharatratana boy Tendulakar a quick 100 plus, expecting the regime-corporate-media mafias to “do more”.
Although English boys have a clear upper “edge” over India, it all depends on when hosts having got 200 plus to one of its batboys would settle d-for a draw. After all Indo-UK crickets consume too much of liquor jointly, possibly deciding what to do next. .
Only the "lords" in London know the details.
Post-Script
India and England have, as fixed by both nations and ICC, are pursuing a month long joint cricket exercises.
The Test-1, testing the patience of those crazy people for 5 long days for each Test, between UK and India "performed" in London, is clearly in favor of the hosts as they have maintained a big total now which India cannot surpass without generous help from England. And England, an ally that shields all Indian crimes in Jammu Kashmir as a colonial policy, is not at all in a mood either to glorify India right now.
However, as per the cricket exchange program, England and India contributed to a few bogus "records". UK Petersen has been offered 200 plus while India Dravid has got a 100 plus chiefly because he has been a visible UK favorite who enjoyed good runs in UK. While the English batboys let India Praveen with a "historic" maiden 5 wicket haul, India denied S. Broad with similar record as he was restricted by Indian batboys with a 4 wicket haul only.
While the English bowlers and fielders, including the skipper Strauss, did not let any other Indian batboy, especially India's greatest "B.ratna" since India originated from history, Sachin Tendullakar whom the Indian regime, especially the sport minister, corrupt corporate and their mischievous media, performed extra painstakingly to keep only Dravid alive until he competed his 100 plus to "rescue" Indian media nuts from total shame.
Hopefully, England will not agree for an Indian draw after being in the driver's seat, comfortably.
Whatever might be the outcome, India cannot win even by fluke but England alone has the advantage to win the 2000th test cricket exchange program at the Lords and lead the series 1-0.
|