Indo-WI Cricketism: When Bowlers strike or refuse to strike….….

-DR. ABDUL RUFF

_____

India leads in regional state terrorism, nuclearism and fictitious cricketism. Other terrocracies just supports Indian gimmicks.

The usual phrase "positive bating" is being used by the running and other commentators to hide the dirty and ugly parts of cricket. One can certainly talk in terms of "positive bowling" or “negative bowling", but talking of "positive bating" is utter nonsense and ridiculous. Batboys play or do not play. Some batboys throw away their bats or some specific reasons. The most important one is to gift their wicket as a bribe to appease the opposite team to let their favorites hit 100 plus (That is how Sachuin was allowed to shine by some). Some players just do not want to add more runs and let their team lose. So they throw away their wickets, while some others do so after making 100 plus. This way, the bowlers get extra free wickets to their bogus credit.

Positive bowling means offering too many runs as a good gesture for some specific reasons, either arranged by mafia, corporate sponsors, or others.

Negative bowling means reckless bowling by line and length concentrate on the stumps, not allowing runs to the batboys, frustrate them and force them to make errors and get back to the pavilion to sip cool.

In fact bowlers are expected to be reckless and genuine, not allowing runs follow on fictitious wicket thrust.

Pro-India running commentary guys say that the match "is turning out to be a dull, boring Test match to be honest", when Indian batboys do not shine and the opponents , here the West indies, have amassed piles of runs about 600 (If Sammy stayed with his bat for  about 30 minutes at the crease the WI could have easily crossed 6 00 plus, but he was reluctant to play and got out at 04 which is the worst score by any WI batboy in Test-3 at Mumbai where the crazy crowds and other people are damn sure their Sachuin would smash so many 100 plus in about a few overs. Since Sammi is the captain he can afford to do that because he has nothing to lose. ..

Today, Indian game plan is simple. Mumbai devotees of Sachuin wanted sachin to get his last 100 plus in Mumbai somehow with corporate mafias playing their role so that Hindu terrorists all over the country could blast their hidden semi-explosives and terror crackers, forcing Indian regime to quickly offer Sachuin the post of Pharatratna without any questions. In fact India’s corporate blackmoney media are impatiently ready to blast the news about Sachuin 100, especially the TVs. After all, gods also need awards. 

Very interesting thing has happened in the test-3 between India and WI in Mumbai. Generally, India is adamant to bat first and therefore seeks to get the toss in their favor even by mischief. In Mumbai Indian let WI win the toss to elect to bat first. Maybe, Indians wanted to crush them all within 100 runs and come to bat to put on board a big score of about 700 plus and win the test. But WI started playing better, not losing wickets as before and India began offering runs to the tune of about 600. In fact neither the team nor the crowd there felt too nervous about it. , precisely because they thought Wi would finally let India win as they did in Delhi when they had the upper hand could have won it or at least draw it. But they, the West Indies, preferred to lose to original Indies to make innocent looking Indians blast explosives - obviously as per the demand placed by India which cannot lose cricket in Delhi for strategic reasons.

It appeared, the WI batboys, like the lambs, waiting to be murdered sooner than later, being overfed by the butcher in the butcher hut, wondering why they are being fed so sumptuously. The same thought perhaps was passing throw the minds of crazy crowds in Mumbai.

Obviously, the decision of Indian strategists to ask the team India offer sumptuous about 600 runs to WI is to indirectly coerce them to let this poor boys Sachuin run away with his last 100 plus.

(“Look, we are the top cricketers and you are the beggar team and yet we have offered so many urns you cannot even dream in WI. So, let Sachuin shine by offering him good runs. We cannot tolerate a suffering Sachuin anymore… “This seems to be the attitude of India. But whether or not the WI boys agreed or let to “help” Indian is in fact doubtful for majority of fanatic crickety Indians, although WI, in a state of overjoy with Indian extra gesture in plenty of runs, lot of black money and cocktails, etc, have offered too many urns to him already., . . )

However, the first inning of India in replay to WI 600 is disastrous and they might now hope for the other formats to do the "needful".

TWO

So, has India fallen into its own trap by choosing to bowl first in the test-3? Or, is it another military trap of a different sort?

When Bowlers strike, there would be disaster for the batboys…….

Problem is bowlers are generally requested to offer special runs to special batboys.

Every batboys wants to get some good runs almost free of troubles from bowlers and fielders. And every bowler plays by keeping in view the fate of their own batboys when they come to bat and offer too many runs...

So, the bowlers do not do justice to their profession, they cheat everybody by playing mischief, pretending to be seriously attacking the batboys… the only offer big runs.

Cricket, generally speaking, is played to falsely boost the image of batboys and bowlers just help h them score big totals, in spite of the fact that bowlers are trained by the countries by wasting huge resources even by making available special coaches for bowling.

As a rare of the rarest in cricket “matches” generally fixed for packages, the latest cricket matches between South Africa and Australia showcased the real power of bowlers. So much so, the “running” commentators were aghast with the regular fall of wickets affecting the “fortunes of the batboys very badly,

23 wickets in day is not very big deal any way. But the teams play mischief not cricket by pampering a few batboys without targeting their stumps or aiming LBW. The fact of the matter is if the bowlers are allowed to maintain pressure on the batboys as a routine matter by applying line and areas properly, no matter how big the batboys may be, there could be more wickets- one wicket in a couple of overs.

In fact there was a stiff competition between South Africa and Australia in plucking wickets and eventually SA won the test-1. Since SA generally is poised well towards Australia the guests could not expect the reversal. In fact “running” commentators were yelling as wickets were falling from both sides like volcano attacks.

Also, Pakistan and Sri Lanka in ODI-1 also played sort of serious cricket when the bowlers played to their full capacity, eventually Pakistan won. .

Fall of Indian wickets regularly would end Indian cricketism. India would not like that at all. They do not want their batboys lose wickets regularly but want to take the wickets of the opponents. Since not all teams would agree for that, India goes for “deals and packages.

India and ICC must have instructed the poor WI boys not to remove the Indian batboys quickly and play “positive” game in favor or India and WI did oblige the hosts who offer them enough cocktail at night. What happens next is not very important.

West Indies have been bullied into playing for Indian image make up. India got the toss and obviously opted to bat first, because the pitch is for the batboys. Only later the pitch changes its character when WI comes to bat.

It seems the Calcutta pitch has been prepared to boost the batboys and make the bowlers to just toil. Without any serious attempt at wickets, the West Indies struggled to break through on a track which had nothing for the bowlers, but struck a couple of wickets towards the end of the day.

West Indies, behaving like paid agents, let Indian batboys enjoy life at the crease and offered huge 346 runs in the first day which is a big score, even though they could make India’s most pampered Tendulakar cry loud along with the mafias and crazy crowds. But they could take only 5 wickets as per their mutual understanding.

Since India controls ICC and cricket field, just like the USA manipulates the NATO and UNSC terror organizations, India can continue to “play” cricket the way it wants.

Running commentators promote cricketism and skepticism and batboys. Indian commentators want India to pluck wickets of other teams quickly but not to lose their wickets. Hence, the India led official match-fixings!

Who can question India or England?

When bowlers strike that could promote cricket, otherwise only cricketism prevails.

--------