Bowling Upsurge in Cricket:  Pakistan punctures England

-DR. ABDUL RUFF

________

Pakistan has slapped all powerful UK, a junior part of USA-UK terror twins, right in their face in Dubai playing test cricket.  Since England claims to be the top test team today while Pakistan is no where in the map and makes no claims, the Pakistani thrash is too harsh for the poor English boys to digest. England, which asks the UK state terrorists to consume the corpses of fallen Muslims in NATO occupied Islamic nations, thought it was too easy to defeat a weakened Pakistan now.

But the English boys are deadly mistaken.

This is the 2nd victory for Pakistan in Dubai. This is also the 3rd time that they have inflicted a 10-wicket win over England.

Since the spot-fixing scandal, conspired by Indo-UK to further weaken Pakistani cricket, Pakistan's decision to appoint Misbah-ul Haq as captain has proved inspired and the team has not looked back, beating the world's best team England by 10 wickets in the first Test on 18^th January in Dubai, the adopted cricket home of Pakistan to play international cricket because of insistence of Indo-UK led ICC not to approve Pakistani stadiums for cricket. Misbah said he has tried to introduce the missing virtues of unity, discipline and focus into the team. Ajmal, who took a career-best 7-55 in the first innings, completed a 10-wicket match haul as Pakistan dismissed England for 160 before scoring the 15 runs needed for victory.

The win gave Pakistan a 1-0 lead in the three-Test series. The second Test starts in Abu Dhabi from January 25 and which won’t be different from this one, but it could only be better if Pakistani boys played with a vision, inheriting the Australian drive against India.  

Match fixing is common in cricket and teams do it on behalf of the nations or mediated by mafia.  But Pakistan has been made a scapegoat because the NATO terror syndicate in Pakistan wanted to control the regime and military o there by adding insult to injury. The Indo-UK spot-fixing scandal of 2010 destroyed the careers of three of Pakistan's most exciting talents in Salman Butt, Mohammad Asif and Mohammad Aamer. These players also refused to quit cricket in protest against ICC highhandedness and favor of human dignity.

 A new sense of discipline, has given the Pakistanis a chance to put their cricket house in order.

However, any other team would have won the match by one innings after such a turn of fortunes in their favor, but Pakistani team lacked both commitment and will or desire for that.   They just wanted to win the match no matter whether with one innings or one run. Gul threw deliberate no-ball t spoil his LBW   removing Swann but Swann had to return to play for more t runs to deny Pakistan a real chance for one innings win over the British “masters”.

Castigated for a lack of unity, consistency and awareness of the pitfalls in the game, some of Pakistan's most talented players went into oblivion.

None is too indispensable in cricket. Shoaib Akhtar has gone away because he lost his way and talent, refusing to reinvent himself.  There is a need to constantly updating the team with new bowlers and batboys with better training.  

In fact Pakistani bowlers are not better than England’s.  Nor the British batboys are worse than Pakistan’s.  But the fact is rankings in cricket are bogus- both teams and individuals.  British team is not the best but they were groomed by others, including India and Australia.

Pakistani victory could be explained not by prowess of its cricketers, but bad cricketers of London which controls the other small nations within what is known as UK, imposing its will on other English speaking peoples. .

Yes, if there is one bowling attack that has the balance and the variety to win a game within 3 days in the flat tracks of UAE, it has to be Pakistan. They have absolutely decimated the so-called number 1 Test side in the world, who looked pretty clueless.

Pakistan still has to re-think about their bowling options,  by removing those who do restrict run flow, because England would certainly make necessary amendments to face the "threat". .