Cricketers of Pakistan:  A few Questions

-Col. Dr. Abdul Ruff

----------------

Pakistani cricketers, by following their political leaders who amass huge wealth  by letting the NATO drone terrorists kill Pakistani Muslims in their own nation while the media lords glorify the  Obama-NATO massacres as sacred deeds, are eager to showcase themselves as the so-called "unpredictables" so that they can effortlessly play mischief as and when the occasion warrants.  Pakistani cricketers are among the lowest payed lot and therefore they probably seek additional fortunes by playing gimmicks. 

But is it fair? 

1. Was there an official match-fixing between the UK and its aid-taker Pakistan on the outcome of the series that Pakistan could white wash UK in test series while it should help UK shine in ODI? England wanted to  improve its bogus ranking in ODI while would lose nohting significantly as its firmly placed  in the top of the bogus test ranking. 

2. Why should Afridi play destructive role  after he joined the  T20 and ODI? Is Afridi a boon or shame  for Pakistan? Pakistan was much better without Afridi and only when he joined the team began collapsing. Was it an Indo-UK  mischief or purely UK-Pak fixing? Of late, out of Pakistani squad, Afridi is busy in foreign premier league teams offering to many 6 s and 4s.  In one of the F5overs match  Afridi is on record offering as many as 32 runs nan over. Has he been sent by UK to discredit Pakistani team? He neither bated nor bowled properly- only made a big show of himself, occasionally shouting at fielder for "misfield" not being able to stop the fast balls driven according to Afridi's dramatist bowling. He is a fine actor and should try hi luck in Hollywood/Bollywood by using Zardari/Manmohan-Cameron and co. 

3. What has happened to ther batobys, including Misbah? Why did Akhmal quickly go forward to let the ball hit his stumps? Pakistani batboys crumbled because the the English  bowlers took their task seriously it save their colonialist  faces from total  disfigurement and disgrace. 

4. How come all bolwers failed in their paid duties collectively? There is not even on durable or strong bowleror fielder  of merit in Pakistani team- is is not a shame on the  terror regime taking order gfform Washington and London? Every bowler is now a Gul offering too many runs.  Known as completely ruthless bowlers with ability for smart variations thus far , Pakistanis are now the meek obeyers and have lost their credit even there.. 

5. Why did they all Pakistanis fail to make any effect both at the crease and field? Have they been told that Pak bowlers in jail would be released and more aid would be added  to Pakistan (taking away from other sources, especially when India, as per UK-India-Pak plan,  played its own brand drama of rejecting UK aid), if  Pak players slowed down their attack on Eng? 

USA and UK have made Pakistan a beggar client a state, directly controlling the policies and politics of Islamabad with terror aid packages as well as protection to illegal wealth of Pak leaders abroad. UK can ask the Zardari regime to help  the Eng boys for more aid. 

This approach is common in Commonwealth. New Zealand, for instance,  makes Zimbabwe play for NZ, possibly  in exchange for similar favors. . . . 

6. Did both English and Pakistan players and their leaders think that since test is useless let Pakistan enjoy the test wins? True, test is the worst format of cricketism played by sharing 100/50 pluses or above between the team batboys and  wickets by bowlers and fielders. 

7. Was the Pak-England series fixed directly by the  regimes themselves or by the mafias as usual? What was the role India played in creating a fading image of Pakistan and its cricket just before the  Asia cup? 

8. Can Pakistani bowlers stop playing  for  the opponents by leaking too many quick runs and begin reckless bowling for the nation? Bowling is Pakistan's key forte. In the ODI with  Cameron boys, the Pak bowlers played against Pakistan by offering too many runs  in the hope of getting return favors to their batboys, but England is the shroud team and refused to return the "unsolicited" favors from Islamabad. And Pak batobys could not shine as they had expected. 

Pakistanis, like others, have a bad habit of offering too many runs in anticipation of return favors from the opponents in similar fashion by way of 100 plus or 50 plus.  Pakistani blowers let the skippers of opponent teams make good runs, expecting similar favors for their own captains.  

English boys thwarted that once for all and Pakistan must learn their first lesson on bogus bowling. 

Henceforth, Pakistan bowlers resort to reckless bowling without showing nay mercy at any  point of time  until the last ball is bowled a or last batboy falls.  If they want to help their batboys then, they should reduce the total runs of the opponents to the bare minimum- as little as they can without making any calculating and counting the wickets they  have got. Wickets are not the basis of cricket, but runs and reduction of the score. If Pakistani batboys are smart they can make runs on their own runs while the a low target would help in a big way to chae down. And win. 

If Pakistan team does not want to change their course of bowling into genuinely reckless, they will have face worse situation of frustrations.