Obama’s Asian diplomacy and Chinese game plan -DR. ABDUL
RUFF
_________________________
Diplomacy has been a vital ingredience of international
politics and a highly resourceful USA has successfully undertaken shuttle
diplomatic exercises worldwide to advance its so-called national interest.
Today, Washington, fearing a future direct confrontation,
is seen making strenuous efforts to contain an economically resurgent China.
Ever since he entered the White House as its Democratic
custodian President Obama has paid concentrated attention to Asia. Obama made his first ever foreign tour in
Indonesia where he claims to have spent his young days.
On Mideast, Obama has squandered all hopes by visiting
Israel after a long delay and now allowing Israeli regime to scuttle the peace
talks with Palestinians which he mediated.
Obama’s pivotal strategic initiative in Asia is still
alive despite the inevitable pull of events in the Middle East and Europe, may
not have made any headway in the multilateral connect objective Washington
seeks to weaken China in Asia and beyond but has opened the door for a stronger
US military presence in Asia.
Washington could take credit for the negotiations on the
Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) that excluded China but that is not everything
that Obama’s Asia Pivot would want.
There is a sharp separation between the USA and the other TPP
participants on many of the major issues like intellectual property rights,
investment guidelines, environment and rules of origin.
Under U.S.
leadership the TPP is pushing for the highest standards, with substantial
attention being paid to issues that are often not seen as directly trade
related, such as intellectual property rights and the rules governing state
enterprises. Many TPP participants are drawn to the potential for spurring
structural reforms in being associated with such a group, but some are also
motivated by the TPP as a counter weight to China’s economic rise.
By escalating the war on Islam, launched by republican
hawks led by Bush Jr, Obama has already helped the Pentagon to gear up the
militarism objective of US militarism strategists, although the project cut
resources from social agenda of Americans supported by the genuine politicians.
Of course, capitalism and militarism have no space for
social benefits or common people’s welfare measures. The US congress, now dominated
by war lords from Republican Party, would not allow any concessions to the poor
or less privileged. .
However, that could not weaken China in any manner. But USA exploits the situation that China
cannot win the battle for regional sentiment so long as the debate is about
security and sovereignty, on which Beijing’s hard position leaves little room
for compromise.. Beijing is pushing the regional agenda of the Regional
Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) with the ASEAN towards more mutually
beneficial concerns, though. China wants
to be seen as an opportunity for western nations, rather than a threat.
The 15th century legendary explorer Zheng had led an
armada of more than 300 ships and 27,000 sailors in voyages from China through
Southeast and South Asia to the Persian Gulf. Today these same corridors play a
vital role in supporting East Asia’s unique production sharing network which
brings components produced throughout the region to China for assembly and then
onwards to final destinations in USA and Europe. Building on these links could
help build more harmonious interactions throughout the region.
A sharp decline in transport costs along the contemporary
maritime silk route allowed all countries in the region, regardless of their
size and technological sophistication, to benefit from specialization and
economies of scale by producing components rather than complete products. This
is the major reason why East Asia has performed so well relative to the rest of
the world. With rising labor costs in China, many ASEAN economies now stand to
gain from future outsourcing of production.
With a view to countering
the Obama’s Asia pivot, Chinese President Xi Jinping during his October
visit to Malaysia and Indonesia put forward the
idea of reviving the historic “maritime silk route”
having a history
of over two thousand years,. This notion builds on the East Asia region’s
proven strengths in sharing production and deepening financial links while
seeking to make greater use of the overseas Chinese communities in forging
relationships to reduce tensions.
New pattern of China-Asia capital flows would affect
economic relationships as China moves from being largely an absorber of funds
to also a major provider. Experts predict that within a decade as much as a
hundred billion dollars will be leaving China annually in the form of direct
investment and portfolio flows, with much of it targeted to Asia.
Overseas Chinese account for as much as two thirds of FDI
flows into China. About 32 million of the 50 million overseas Chinese reside in
Southeast Asia, including PRC nationals who live abroad and ethnic Chinese who
have assimilated into their host countries. They account for a preponderance of
the wealth in a number of ASEAN countries and play key roles in the regional
production sharing network, aspects of which are coordinated out of Hong Kong,
Singapore and in electronics, Taiwan, blurring concepts of what constitutes
overseas ethnic Chinese communities and their political status. These Chinese
continue to exhibit an enduring cultural connection to China despite
assimilating and naturalizing to host countries abroad.
Most overseas Chinese do not share a bond with China
beyond purely economic interests. Other local populations throughout Southeast
Asia remain concerned about how greater engagement with China will benefit them
directly and not just the Diaspora. Such feelings are more extreme in countries
like Vietnam and the Philippines but with varying gradations also a
consideration in Malaysia, Indonesia and Thailand.
This Chinese community indirectly determines the regime
shift in Malaysia.
History called the Silk Route could be repeating itself
as centuries ago Chinese copper coins were used as the medium of exchange
throughout the maritime silk route, foreshadowing China’s current ambitions to
internationalize its currency. The challenge, however, is reaching out to a
broader range of communities and not relying only on the Chinese Diaspora in
Southeast Asia to facilitate China’s outward flow of capital.
The US concept of a revitalized maritime Silk Route may
not help promote more positive foreign policy outcomes within Asia so long
China is ready with counter schemes and American business lords seek Chinese
money, though this might serve the ultimate interests of the USA and Pacific in
ensuring safe and open access to the major maritime corridors However, the more
USA tries to restrict or contain Beijing, the more China would strengthen its
position in Asia. The approach would not reduce
regional tensions.
|