Indian religious politics: Jayalalithaa now invokes
divine intervention in settling the illegal assets case!
-Dr. Abdul Ruff Colachal
__________________
Former Tamil actress turned TN chief minister Ms. J. Jayalalithaa,
a strong aspirant of Indian premier’s chair in New Delhi, continues to play her role well in politics
too to get her released from the disproportionate asset case which has already
cost her CM post and the right to contest for 10 years. The case is now before the Hon Karnataka High
Court. She now plays with the religious sentiments of Indian judges most of
them are religious minded Hindus. Jaya and her party leaders are sure their
religious tool would force the Indian judiciary to “listen” to the call of gods
and get Jaya out of all cases so that she resumes power as CM of TN.
However, at the back of their minds the AIADMK
politicians know it is not always possible to fool the alert judiciary as it is
easy done by the government dealing with common people.
Former Tamil Nadu Chief Minister Jayalalithaa conveyed to
the Supreme Court that she has kept her word that she would not delay her
criminal appeal before the Karnataka High Court, challenging the four-year
imprisonment awarded in a disproportionate assets case. A Bench led by Chief Justice of India H.L.
Dattu had, on October 17, granted Ms. Jayalalithaa bail, reposing faith in the
oral assurances of her lawyer, Fali Nariman, that she would not delay the
criminal appeal proceedings in the 18-year-old case.
Though it granted bail, the Bench did not dispose of the
bail petition. It fixed a hearing for December 18, when Ms. Jayalalithaa and
three co-accused were to report that they kept their word and filed the appeal
documents and records in the High Court. Ms. Jayalalithaa filed her appeal
papers, which contained voluminous documents running to 2.8 lakh pages, in the
Karnataka High Court on December 8.
On December 18, the Supreme Court requested the High
Court to complete the hearing within three months through a Special Bench. The
hearing started on January 5 this year. The Special Bench had 41 days of
sittings. The arguments of SPP G. Bhavani Singh lasted six days, and counsel
for Ms. Jayalalithaa, V.K. Sasikala, V.N. Sources in Ms Jayalalithaa’s legal
team said they would be more than willing to cooperate if the Supreme Court
fixed a time frame for the completion of the appeal hearing. However, her
lawyers said three months might be too short given the sheer size of the
documents submitted before the HC.
However, the Karnataka High Court on March 11 reserved
its verdict on the appeals filed by AIADMK general secretary Jayalalithaa and
three others against their conviction in the disproportionate assets case. Justice
C.R. Kumaraswamy reserved orders as formalities of filing written statements
and replies were completed in the afternoon.
Earlier, BJP leader Subramanian Swamy submitted
arguments, requesting the court to dismiss the appeals, and uphold the Special
Court’s September 27, 2014, verdict sentencing Ms. Jayalalithaa to four-year
rigorous imprisonment. S. Senthil, advocate-on-record for Ms. Jayalalithaa,
submitted a brief reply to the arguments. Dr. Swamy said the AIADMK general secretary Jayalalithaa
approached the Karnataka High Court with “unclean hands” with the “false” claim
that the Income Tax authorities had “accepted” her statements of income to be
“true and genuine,” BJP leader Subramanian Swamy has stated in his written
arguments submitted to the Court on 11th march. “This is not only
false, but it is knowingly false since Income Tax authorities have not made and
cannot make any such admission under Section 279 or any other section of the
I-T Act,” contended Dr. Swamy.
Compounding of the offence of non-filing of Income Tax
returns after she paid the tax dues and penalty does not in any way represent a
legal vindication of any claims of Ms. Jayalalithaa on how the income she
claimed was earned, and there can’t be escape from prosecution under the
Prevention of Corruption Act, he has stated.
In December, 2014, the AIADMK leader’s prosecution was marked by many twists and
turns over the years as the accused repeatedly sought legal remedy for various
issues. Here are all the latest developments in the case. The charges:
Conspiracy: As CM, Jayalalithaa conspired with three others to acquire assets
to the tune of Rs. 66.65 crore. Disproportionate Assets: The assets were
disproportionate to her known income; Abetment: The other three abetted the
offence by acting as benami owners of 32 private firms; Prosecution's take; Modus operandi was to
deposit cash in benami firms’ accounts; Prosecution's
take; The firms gave her address as theirs while opening accounts; Prosecution's take; Ms. Jayalalithaa spent
crores of rupees on renovations and constructions, her foster son’s wedding and
possessed huge quantity of jewellery.
Detailed arguments against the Special Court verdict have
been prepared, with Ms. Jayalalithaa’s lawyers focusing on what they term “a
faulty analysis of evidence” by the lower court. Even during his arguments for
her bail in the Karnataka HC, senior BJP leader and lawyer Ram Jethmalani focused
on the treatment of evidence by the Special Judge.
Jayalalithaa isn’t the first politician to be
convicted on corruption charges but she is the country’s first serving chief
minister to be sentenced; most significant, she cannot contest elections for
the next 10 years. Can Ms Jayalalithaa, who turned 66 earlier this year, survive
this blow politically?
Ms Jayalalithaa is, after all, still at the
height of her powers: in the last assembly elections, the AIADMK-led alliance
won a whopping 203 seats in the 234-strong assembly. Earlier this year, her
party won 37 of 39 Lok Sabha seats in Tamil Nadu.
Should Ms Jayalalithaa fail to win a reversal
of the verdict in a higher court as she has done earlier, what does the future
hold for her? Is there a political life after conviction – or serious charges –
for politicians?
Former Haryana chief minister Om Prakash
Chautala is a case in point. Three years after he demitted office, he was
charged in June 2008 in connection with the appointment of 3,206 junior
teachers in Haryana in 1999-2000, and sentenced to 10 years imprisonment in
January 2013. Now out of prison on bail on health grounds, Chautala – ahead of next month’s Haryana elections -
addressed a political rally in Jind that saw a substantial turnout, and his
INLD, reports suggest, will make a good showing. However, the court on Friday
asked him to return to jail, upset that he hadn’t heeded its directive not to
participate in political activity while out on bail.
Rashtriya Janata Dal leader Lalu Prasad Yadav
stepped down as Bihar chief minister in 1997 when he was charged in the fodder
scam. He installed his wife, Rabri Devi as CM, the party went on to win another
election, and she remained in office till 2005. Last year, Mr Yadav lost his
Lok Sabha membership after he was convicted. And if the party fared poorly in
2009 and 2014, it was more a result of a lack of seat adjustments: in 2004,
when his party went to elections with the Congress and the Lok Jan Shakti
Party, it did well, and he became union railway minister in UPA I.
And ahead of the general elections, the BJP
brought back former Karnataka chief minister B.S. Yeddyurappa into the party,
even though he was yet to be cleared of all the corruption charges against him
– the party had forced him to step down as CM in July 2011 due to these
charges. Annoyed at the time, he quit the BJP and formed the KJP in 2012. In
the May 2013 assembly elections, the KJP got 10 per cent of the votes, and the
BJP lost power in the state.
Clearly, if Ms Jayalalithaa can get an
acquittal in a higher court, she will still have a chance of making a comeback:
if she fails, it may prove difficult to remote control the party for 10 years.
It is no surprise that Jayalalithaa is
going all out to invoke god’s intervention as well. She has already used huge
sums, used the party and people of Tamil Nadu through the party and TN
government, money, government, freebies
political influences in Delhi, in fact she could feel elated that many Tamils committed
suicide to ensure her bail from Bangalore jail.
Tamil Nadu government is smartly playing
sentimental and “divine” politics to coerce the Hindu minded judges to release
Jayalalithaa to continue wither brand politics.
As more and more people seek clean
governance, genuine politics, the role played by the central government is
crucial in such matters. If it tries to
save corrupt peole, no one would trust Indian democracy, any more.
|