(Dear President Obama, India can kill neighbor-Kashmiris but it says none should interfere!)

I

Democratically owned by big businesses, secular India vehemently protested against the US decision to send an emissary, Ambassador Holbrooke, to South Asia to deal with Kashmir freedom issue. New Delhi says Kashmir is an "internal issue" and other guys should not meddle with Indian political affairs. India considers state terrorism a part of Indian polity. Interestingly, India also considers and, for fun, calls itself a holy democracy that too a secular democracy and therefore the entire world should respect it and take its advice. India thus does not expect any other country or leader to suggest any thing to India because India knows every thing and does every thing properly for the Indians and the world at large.

India knows cash does miracles in IP. India looks forward to making the US president Obama a pro-India lobbyist world wide. India got the US message from the president-elect Obama when he declined to speak to Indian leaders when he assumed office or even before that, while he spoke to Pakistani president Zardari. As a result, India vigorously -- and successfully -- lobbied the Obama transition team to make sure that neither India nor Kashmir was included in Holbrooke's official brief. "Innocent" India rose up to shamelessly defend the property stolen from Kashmiri's in 1947 and now under heavy militarization. The Indians freaked out at talk of Bill Clinton being an envoy to Kashmir The evidence that India was able to successfully lobby the Obama transition in the weeks before it took office to ensure Holbrooke's mission left them and Kashmir out is testament to both the sensitivity of the issue to India as well as the prowess and sophistication of its Washington political and lobbying operation. The reason they were so worried is they don't want their activities in Kashmir to be equated with what Israel is doing in Palestine. Ambassador Holbrooke is nicknamed "the Bulldozer" for arm-twisting warring leaders to the negotiating table as he hammered out the 1995 Dayton peace accords that ended the war in Bosnia.

On the one hand, India aims at the economic super power to replace USA and Japan, on the other it continues contribute to the regional tensions by keeping Jammu Kashmir captive and spend more resources on terror military. India is too sentimental about it illegal invasion, subsequent annexation of Jammu Kashmir and hurried enjoinment with Indian Union soon after Indian independence, but it expects its illegal occupation is considered "sympathetically" by Obama.

The news about Obama getting tough on 'Wall Street idiots' to straighten the recession processes did send out some message to the world, but soon world understood his rhetoric as being part of larger US global visions. Obama has got the economic package to outwit recession passed by the Congress. But one expects the same resoluteness and firmness of Obama in dealing with all of external affairs, in Afghanistan, Iraq and Pakistan now under US occupation; in Palestine now under fascist Israeli terror occupation; Kashmir now under Indian terror custody.

II

America does every thing to advance its own interests and many countries fall prey to it knowingly or other wise assisting the US leaders to secure its economic and security interests. India captured Jammu Kashmir after the WWII and the USA could have effectively stopped the Indian arrogance the and there; USA could have prevented India from killing defenseless Kashmiris on their own Kashmir lands now under Indian brute occupation. Indian genocides offered enough opportunities for the Kashmir freedom groups to make a united forum to which India could address directly in stead of searching for the most important pro-India ones. But the leaders, particularly the pro-India elements, are opportunists and one does not know if the freedom leaders too have any hidden ties with JK ruling regime and Indian government in New Delhi. Otherwise, in spite of the holocaust situation prevailing in Jammu Kashmir where thousands of Muslims have been butchered by terrorist India, the freedom groups refuse to merge themselves into a Kashmir National forum which fascist India takes seriously enough to start the negotiations.

Knowing the divisions in JK in all respects and Indian hollow sentimentalism over an alien Jammu Kashmir, USA has thus far played its own dirty tricks and played second fiddle to Indian neo-capitalists whose money it needs very badly. Kashmiris should not have illusions about US decency and sincerity in any thing and that it would just ask India to free Kashmir to enable Washington and its western allies to do business with New Delhi. Rogues are friends and always That is why despite the fact that ruthless human rights violations continue in Kashmir and in other Muslim countries like Afghanistan, Palestine and Iraq, America is not playing the part which it otherwise should USA knows how to help Israel by using the Arabs, but does not know how to help Kashmiris by applying similar logic with India. Thieves pretend to be greats, however.

III

India seeks special relationships with USA, Israel and other "democracies" to safeguard its global and terror interests. Since India pumps in money to USA markets, India wants the Americans behave properly and not interfere in its "internal" affairs' and seek resolution of Kashmir issue. Bush played very skillfully and got enough cash from India by using a pro-capitalism Manmohan Singh, but Indians want Obama also to pursue the Bushdom policy with regard to India, practically ignoring the Kashmir issue while insisting on resolution on peaceful means which means nothing.

India was looking forward to cash-in the Indo-US nuclearism, "gifted" by Bush for support in genocides in Afghanistan, but Obama's rise did create jerks in New Delhi corridor of power politics. Indo-US nuclearism is the culmination of a long time hidden ties between them for decades. Israel promoted that link. As per Indian thesis, America will not intervene directly because India will not let it. However, there is no doubt that Holbrooke will encourage India to take the matter up bilaterally. India should do this before it is pressured into doing it.. However Mrs., Clinton has reassured India of US policy of understand the "weaknesses" of its allies, both old and new. India thinks USA would be bullied some how to k put the Kashmir issue in the back burner.

Given India's fierce, decades-long resistance to any internationalization of the Kashmir dispute, to have done so would have been a non-starter for India, and guaranteed failure before the envoy mission had begun. But to many experts in Washington on South Asia , the decision to not include India or Kashmir in the official Terms of Reference of Holbrooke's mandate was not just appropriate, but absolutely necessary.

But many others, including Obama himself, who proposed a special envoy to deal with Kashmir during the campaign - is firm in belief that the South Asia region's security challenges cannot be solved without including India. Obama told Time that working with Pakistan and India to try to resolve their Kashmir conflict would be a critical task for his administration's efforts to try to counter growing instability in Afghanistan and Pakistan. "Kashmir in particular is an interesting situation where that is obviously a potential tar pit diplomatically. Indians want to break out of being in a hyphenated relationship with America. They don't want to be grouped with the 'problem children' in the region, on Kashmir, on nuclear issues. They have a fairly effective lobbying machine. They have taken a lot of notes on the Israel model, and they have gotten better. But you don't want to overstate it. Some of the lobbying effort is obvious, done through companies, but a lot of it is direct government to government contact, people talking to each other. The Indian government and those around the Indian government made clear through a variety of channels because of the Clinton rumors and they came out to quickly shoot that down. Once Holbrooke's name was floated, the Indian lobbying campaign became even more intense.

One of leading Indian lobbyists, BGR has been a registered lobbyist for the Indian government since 2005 Sources said India's hired lobbyists were deployed to shape the contours of the U.S. diplomatic mission. According to lobbying records filed with the Department of Justice, since 2005, the government of India has paid BGR about $2.5 million. Former U.S. ambassador to India Robert Blackwill, who previously served as a lobbyist for India, left BGR in 2008 for the Rand Corporation. In addition, the Indian embassy in Washington has paid lobbying firm Patton Boggs $291,665 under a six-month contract that took effect Aug. 18, according to lobbying records. BGR continues to actively lobby on behalf of the Indian government - their lobbyists sought to influence a recent Senate resolution on the Mumbai attacks. Indian leaders are worried about Holbrooke's tough-as-nails reputation and want to keep him off from "˜meddling;' in Kashmir issue. His discussion on Kashmir can prove embarrassment for the Indian leaders, who had been "˜claiming victory' after recent statement from Washington that Kashmir does not figure in Holbrooke's agenda.

In what could be seen as an embarrassment for the Indian government, Kashmir will top the agenda of Obama's special envoy to Pakistan and Afghanistan, Richard Holbrooke during his visit to the sub-continent. Richard Holbrooke is expected to undertake a visit to India on February 15 and 16. He would now all the issues related to Pakistan and terror, Holbrooke with also discuss Kashmir issue with the Indian leaders.

Recently, UN secretary-general said India and Pakistan should resume peace process to resolve all outstanding issues. Moon termed Kashmir as an important issue between Islamabad and New Delhi . The UN Chief said cordial relationship between India and Pakistan would not only benefit the two countries but is also desirable for peace and security in the region leading to existence of Jammu Kashmir as an independent nation. After US's nominated envoy to Kashmir Susan Rice termed Kashmir as "hotspot", the United Nations Secretary General, Ban Ki Moon has named Kashmir as an important issue and urged India and Pakistan to resume the dialogue process to resolve all outstanding issues including Kashmir.

A Note

But the problem with India is it does not take UN and UNSC seriously. It believes it can resolve all issues by throwing cash which both the government and private traders have plenty, including stolen.  Recently India even bribed the UN chief Ban ki moon with an award for economic development. How much cash India has transferred to USA is remains a "deeply guarded" secret.

Bribery is prohibited in India and those small fellows found guilty of bribery cases are punished as criminals, while big animals do escape even legal proceedings. But Indian government directly and through various NGOs bribe the foreign governments, their officials, lawmakers and other agencies to get things done for India at any cost. The issues involved may be petty ones and of immense importance, but the bribery and other corrupt practices don't justify that. Is that unethical and immoral and therefore, illegal?

President Obama has recently restricted the foreign lobbyists around White House in Wessington. Obama who won the presidency and ultimately appointed her to carry out his foreign policy as the Obama administration's top diplomat and Clinton has to use Obama policy stated by him during the campaign. But India just doe snot care for Obama's instructions against lobbyists because it argues, finally it is the power brokers who rule any country, including USA.

It is not news that India bribes foreign agents, it is a usual activity on international arena, while each country talks about law and rules domestically and has a constitution to punish those whom the rulers don't like or hate. In the name democracy every type of fraud and forgery go.

Though the newly elected president of America Barack Hussein Obama has stated that America is not the enemy of Muslims and wants to solve the ongoing world disputes, he is not taking any serious step for the resolution of Kashmir. But the Neocons who guided President Bush (and his daddy US president) in all that did for 8 years are against Muslims and Islam. They think Islam is a serious threat to their global interests.

An "innocent" India says, rather parrot-shouts, Jammu Kashmir is an integral part of India because it is still inside the Indian Union. When the Indian government learned Holbrooke was going to visit both Pakistan and India, they swung into action and lobbied to have India excluded from his purview and approached Mrs Clinton. When Secretary of State Hillary Clinton -- flanked by President Obama -- introduced Richard Holbrooke as the formidable new U.S. envoy to South Asia at a State Department ceremony, India was noticeably absent from his title. But the omission of India from his title, and from Clinton's official remarks introducing the new diplomatic push in the region was no accident -- not to mention a sharp departure from Obama's own previously stated approach of engaging India, as well as Pakistan and Afghanistan, in a regional dialogue..

The Obama administration, like the previous ones, knows Kashmir is the main reason for the instability in Asia and the peace in this subcontinent would not be attained till the Kashmir issue is resolved. But the pro-India outfits ruining the freedom chances and freedom leaders having no thought out program as a united forum the military hegemon in South Asia India is conveniently misleading the world bodies by its "false propaganda".

Barrack Obama seems to comprehend the Indian weakness for Kashmir and global prestige and has tried to appease Indians by keeping silent about Kashmir resolution off and on now. Obama during his presidential campaign had said the Kashmir issue was central to any stability in the region. Obama's comments had rekindled hopes in Kashmir and Pakistan that the Obama administration might play a greater role in seeking a negotiated settlement to the Kashmir dispute than previous US administrations.

-----------------------

Yours Sincerely,

DR.ABDUL RUFF Colachal

Columnist & Independent Researcher in World Affairs, The only Indian to have gone through entire India

South Asia.