Israeli Fascism is still Blood-thirsty

I- Crime & no Punishment

The new Israeli premier is not a novice in state terrorism tactics in Palestine. Nor can he be expected to be a statesman of any stature. Hawkish Israeli president Peres refused to invite the Ms. Livni, foreign minister in the outgoing government, though her party had more seats than the Likud has. The reason is clearly to deny any chance for the creation of Palestine to which the Livni’s Kadima party was committed. The advanced “democracies” view the freedom seeking Palestinians as a threat to Zionist regional interests and hence call them “terrorists”, while the fascist Israelis are the petboys of Washington. Under the US-UK shield, the Israeli terrorists have been terminating the Palestinian lives. The official Jews have been avoiding the severest possible punishments for their holocaust in Palestine.

The so-called “democratic” regimes in the world, Israel and USA are not at talking about the special tribunals to try the Israeli criminals nor the UN or UNSC make any move towards that. In fact, the total silence over the issue can be ascribed to the fact that they don’t want to punish fascist state terrorists, chiefly because those to be hanged as punishment are the rulers in these democracies, India, USA and Israel, for instance. UNSC must create Guantanamo in USA to try these state terrorists.  

It is too dangerous for the Palestinians to live on their lands surrounded by the Zionist terrorists who, with a view to expanding their stolen territories, keep scheming against them and kill them without any concern or worry. Ever since Israel invaded and annexed Palestinian territories with help from western terror powers and established Israel state, the Zionist state began attacking and killing the defenseless Palestinians and provoked them to protest. The recent Israeli holocaust was the largest by Olmert regime and, going by the statements made by the leaders, the current one cannot be different either.

The US diplomats/strategists have resumed their Mideast diplomacy to find ways, perhaps, to prolong the conflict. USA could view that any positive Palestine resolution might reduce the importance of the American diplomats. Israel thinks once peace returns to the Mideast, Israel would be thrown into historical dustbin by the White House keepers. US Middle East envoy George Mitchell is touring the Mideast region, meeting with leaders in Israel, West bank and Egypt.  A senior Western diplomat familiar with the Obama administration's deliberations said Washington wanted to pursue the Arab peace initiative but was keeping its options “open”.  

The problem with Israel is its refusal to surrender the stolen lands to the Palestinians for peace. But Israel employs all sorts of dirty terrorist methods to drive away the innocent Palestinians who think they are winning, from their lands. In order to fool the world, Israel also says committed itself in 2003 to the establishment of a Palestinian state under the "roadmap" peace plan. Netanyahu who leads a right-leaning coalition combining the centre-right, centre-left and far-right parties said the economy in the Israeli-occupied West Bank should be improved before progress on creating a Palestinian state is attempted. Netanyahu “intends” to resume talks and co-operation to promote "economic peace".

II- Israeli double-speak

The US President Barack Obama's envoy to the Middle East George Mitchell met hawkish Netanyahu on 16 April and discussed about prospects for peace.  Unwilling to surrender the lands confiscated by the Jewish state form Palestine, Israel’s new hawkish PM, extremist Benjamin Netanyahu blindly, like a child, told the US guest that he will discuss a Palestinian state only if Palestinians recognize Israel as a Jewish state. Mitchell arrived in Israel to a changed political landscape “We are committed to two states for two peoples living alongside each other in security and peace.

Netanyahu spoke to Mitchell about "the need to involve in the process important moderate Arab states," including Egypt, Jordan and Saudi Arabia. While Netanyahu has not previously endorsed the creation of a Palestinian state, his foreign minister hawkish militant leader Avigdor Lieberman, who is on record having warned all Palestinians would be drowned in the Dead Sea, has said the diplomatic process was at a "dead end" and new ideas and a new approach were needed. But he confused the visitor by saying that his government remains committed to the Road Map plan, which aims to create a Palestinian state through a phased process. He however has no idea about the new approach and one wonders if Israel should kill more Palestinians. But he has also rejected the previous Israeli government's pledge to work towards Palestinian statehood at the 2007 peace conference at Annapolis in the US.

George Mitchell reiterated US support for a Palestinian state alongside Israel, in talks with the Israeli president and foreign minister. However his upbeat tone appeared to contrast with the message from Israeli Foreign Minister militant Lieberman, who has rejected the previous Israeli government's pledge in 2007 to work towards a Palestinian state under then-US President George W Bush. Israeli deputy Foreign Minister Danny Ayalon confirmed that the new government was committed to the 2003 roadmap peace plan, which outlines a staged peace process leading to the establishment of a Palestinian state. He said the end goal of the plan was "absolutely" a Palestinian state, but stressed that also "we must ensure our survival here as a Jewish state". Under previous agreements, the PLO faction recognized the right of the state of Israel to exist.

Recognition comes only when a Palestine state comes into being. Recognizing it as a Jewish state would be tantamount to abandoning one of the Palestinians' key demands in final-status talks, the "right to return" of Palestinians refugees. Israel opposes the return of Palestinian refugees to their former homes in what is now the Jewish state and wants to hold on to major settlement blocs in the West Bank. As it expands the alien territories by constructing illegal settlements for Jews, Israel keeps shifting its position on the negotiation format and peace process initiatives but only tries to find the right moment to attack the defenseless Palestinians. This is usual Zionist dichotomy and the drama act from the Israeli leaders for quite some time now since Yassar Arafat. Israel as usual anticipates close co-operation and co-ordination with the US administration. 

III- Arab Peace Plan

 U.S. Middle East envoy George Mitchell said that an Arab peace initiative should be part of a planned U.S. drive to create a Palestinian state. The Arab initiative of 2002 offers Israel normal ties with all Arab states in return for a full withdrawal from the lands it seized in the 1967 Middle East war, creation of a Palestinian state and a "just solution" for Palestinian refugees. Mitchell did not elaborate on what part the Arab initiative might play in U.S. attempts to mediate a two-state solution between Israelis and Palestinians. "The U.S. is committed to the establishment of a sovereign independent Palestinian state where the aspirations of the Palestinian people to control their destiny are realized. We want the Arab peace initiative to be part of the effort to reach this goal," Mitchell said after talks with Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas in the West Bank city of Ramallah.

The 2002 Arab peace initiative - under which Arab states would normalize relations with Israel in exchange for full Israeli withdrawal from the West Bank and Gaza - should be the basis of peace talks.  Israel opposes the return of Palestinian refugees to their former homes in what is now the Jewish state and wants to hold on to major settlement blocs in the West Bank. Until the Netanyahu government unequivocally affirms its support for the two-state solution, implements Israel’s Road Map [2003 peace plan] obligations and abides by previous agreements, Palestinians have no partner for peace. PLO called on Israel to keep its commitment to freeze building in settlements in the West Bank. 

U.S. leaders including President Barack Obama have made references to the Arab peace plan without ever endorsing the Arab demand that Israel withdraw from all the land Israel captured in the 1967 Middle East war -- the West Bank including East Jerusalem, the Syrian Golan Heights, and the Gaza Strip, which is under siege.  The previous U.S. administration of George W. Bush tried without success to use the Arab peace plan to draw Saudi Arabia and other conservative Gulf States into contacts with Israel before the Israelis gave any commitment to full withdrawal. Having known the Zionist fascist methods, the senior Palestinian figures rightly doubt Israeli ability and will to come to a full peace deal.  It is sheer arrogance on Israel’s part to insist on advance recognition. This is seen as a challenge to international efforts, especially by the US. It needs the international community to carefully review Israeli policy for fear of devastating repercussions on the whole region," he said. Recognition comes only when a Palestine state comes into being.

 IV – Is Israel a part of USA?

The way the global terror states like USA and UK shield the fascist Israel, it looks as if Israel is not just an ally but indeed a part of the USA. Israel, however, let the world think USA being a part of Israel and, consequently, an ally of Israel. Whatever may be the reality, the Israeli-West terror combination is not good for the world and peace...

Having skillfully used the Americans for its nefarious activities in Arab and Islamic world, Israel care a damn for US leaders because the Zionist fascists have taken the American endorsements of Israeli terrorism in Palestine for granted. Human rights groups say construction activity has continued since President Obama came into office. The settlements are considered illegal under international law, although Israel disputes this. While He has said the economy in the Israeli-occupied West Bank should be improved before progress on creating a Palestinian state is attempted.

As it has been the routine diplomacy of US-led western leaders to first meet the fascist Jews in Tel Aviv before meeting the PLO chief in West bank. The US envoy had dinner with Netanyahu before traveling to the West Bank for talks with Palestinian leaders on 17 April Friday. He also met Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas and Prime Minister Salam Fayyad in Ramallah, but yet refuses to meet the Hamas leaders.

Mitchell's first meeting was with President Shimon Peres, followed by premier and foreign minister. Peres told him that "no door to peace" had been closed and called 2009 a "decisive year in the Middle East ".Peres dismissed as "nonsense" speculation that Israel was planning to attack Iran over its nuclear program. He said the solution with Iran was "not military", and progress with Tehran depended on international co-operation. Mitchell assured the president of Washington’s "absolute and strong commitment" to Israel’s security.

 The Palestinian Authority supremo Mahmoud Abbas told George Mitchell that Israel’s new extremist PM Netanyahu is not known for any positive thinking and is not a partner for peace unless he backs a Palestinian state. Top negotiator of Abbas, Saeb Erekat said Netanyahu’s new demand that the Palestinians recognize Israel as a Jewish state was meant to stall talks towards negotiations. It is sheer arrogance on Israel’s part to insist on advance recognition. Erekat's statement also called on Israel to keep its commitment to freeze building in settlements in the West Bank.  For peace talks to resume, Israel must declare its support for a two-state solution.

Israel seeks recognition from every Muslim nation so that it could legitimize holocaust in Palestine. Under US pressure tactics, the PLO (Palestine Liberation Organization) has already recognized the state of Israel. Netanyahu refuses to even mention a Palestinian state. Abbas accused to new government of putting "new obstacles" in the way of a two-state solution. Abbas accused to new government of putting "new obstacles" in the way of a two-state solution. This is seen as a challenge to international efforts, especially by the US. It needs the international community to carefully review Israeli policy for fear of devastating repercussions on the whole region," Abbas said.  

Meanwhile, Netanyahu's predecessor, Ehud Olmert, said he saw positive points in the Arab peace initiative. In three separate violent incidents in the West Bank on 17 April Friday, even while the Jewish and American leaders were deliberating peace, Israelis, as usual, killed three Palestinian men, the highest number of deaths in the occupied territory for over a year. That is Zionism or Israeli fascism. Israel is determined to kill Palestinians in a sustained manner with US-UNSC protection.

In Gaza, democratic Hamas's two senior leaders, Ismail Haniyeh and Mahmoud al-Zahar made their first public appearances, delivering sermons in mosques. Neither had been seen in public since December 27, when Israel launched a 22-day holocaust offensive in Gaza for domestic purposes but claiming to counter Palestinian toy rocket fire from the Gaza Strip. The toy rockets are allegedly supplied by Mossad agents in the region and Jews from occupied Zionist settlements.

V - Fascism can be defeated only by UNSC & USA  

Fascism has not distinct boundaries, language or color. Israeli fascism is too excessive and US support for state terrorism by Israel in Palestine is root cause for Zionist holocaust in the region. Mitchell's remarks were another reminder to Israel’s new extreme right-wing leader Netanyahu, who has set toppling Hamas among his long-term goals, that the USA wants to see progress. Netanyahu hypocritically wants the Palestinians to first recognize Israel as a Jewish state before talking about two states for two peoples.

The Palestinian territory, already terrorized by Olmert regime, has been largely quiet since the Netanyahu government took power this month. Peace efforts are also hampered by internal Palestinian divisions, under which the PA controls the West Bank, but the Gaza Strip is controlled by Hamas, which rightly refuses to recognize Israel unless Israel let Palestinians have their own free Palestine. Netanyahu should know that recognizing Israel as a Jewish state would be tantamount to abandoning one of the Palestinians' key demands in final-status talks, the "right to return" of Palestinian refugees. Palestinians have long rejected such explicit recognition of the Jewish nature of a state where one in five people is Arab. For peace talks to resume, Israel must declare its support for a two-state solution. Israeli leaders are arrogant Jews who use the Americans and Europeans for their own ends and to destroy the Palestinians with the Arab and other Islamic nations watching the shows as funny spectators with hard glasses. Israeli leaders should know once the lands are returned to the Palestinians there is no cause for “security concerns” that are merely imaginary but aroused only to fool the world.

Israel has a free hand in the region and thus kills any Muslim just for fun. Israel is known for unilaterally revoking the truce with Palestinians on some flimsy grounds only to resume holocaust. It is clear that there is a government in Israel that rejects signed agreements, that insists on continuing settlement activities. PLO has also urged the administration of US President Barack Obama to act as an "even-handed" broker. Abbas asked Mitchell to "exert every possible effort" to pressure Israel to commit to a two-state solution and to meet other obligations, including a freeze in Jewish settlement building in the West Bank and a halt to home demolitions in Arab East Jerusalem. Netanyahu's two-week-old government has yet to take a public position on the Arab peace initiative. So, Netanayahu has not committed to restart U.S.-backed talks with Abbas on core issues such as statehood borders, and the future of Jerusalem and Palestinian refugees.

Americans are fond of shuttle diplomacy and sumptuous dinners abroad with insignificant, small dignitaries. Mitchell's next stop is Egypt. So far, he has not discussed the modalities for public trials or trials by special tribunals to try for punishing the Israeli criminals. Had any Muslim ruler committed similar anti-human murders that person would have been in trial box immediately.  But the USA and Israel as well as PLO, playing select roles in the region, have not really cared to punish the criminals, while the Hamas claimed even victory in the mass murders of innocent Palestinians.

USA and other world leaders must revise their age-old practice of visiting Israel first before going to Palestine and, in recent times; they refuse to meet the elected leaders of Hamas. The USA should show the way to the world by sending its representatives first to Palestine before Israel, even better exclusively to Palestine, both West Bank and Gaza so that Israel understands the American policy is indeed chaining. (The US diplomats and leaders, however, could carry with them Israeli food to Palestine if they prefer it to the menu in Palestine). Will the year 2009 be decisive year for the Mideast to become a region free from wars, holocaust, destruction and tensions to emerge as a peaceful zone? The onus lies with USA, UNSC, Arab states, ICJ, ICC and Israel

Meanwhile, President Obama would do justice to the world, if he asks the Israeli state to rescue the former Likud Premier Ariel Sharon who has been kept in a coma for years now by the Jewish militant medicos, possibly punishing him for his pro-Palestine stand. .

-----------------------

Yours Sincerely,

DR. ABDUL RUFF Colachal