Afghan Strategy: Obama must wind up Terror Wars!

               Dr. Abdul Ruff Colachal

                                       I

US President Obama has been, for quite some time, trying to end the terror wars being illegally waged by NATO in Islamic world. In order to force President Obama not to wind up terror wars in Afghanistan, Iraq and Pakistan, the NATO terror strategists have devised a strategy to ask for more troops so that Obama could prolong or keep on the hold his total withdrawal plans, exposing the US international fraudulence and mischief under terror Republican regime. The NATO rogue states occupying Afghanistan and killing Muslims there are pressing the US president Obama to quickly act upon the new strategy in Afghanistan readied by the NATO. Obama seems to be eager to wind up the terror wars in Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan, mainly because he is more or less convinced of the terror wars being illegal and immoral. Meanwhile, the NATO hawks are trying all dirty terror tricks to forces Obama to release more terror troops to Afghanistan.

On the eve of the announcement of Nobel Prize which he won, US President Barack Obama told key members of US Congress that he would decide on a course of action in Afghanistan with a sense of urgency - but that not everyone would be pleased. It was launched to oust the Taliban from Afghanistan following the 11 September attacks on the US. Obama has been busy holding his (five) meetings with his National Security Council, as well as field commanders and regional ambassadors.

The meeting came on the eve of the eighth anniversary of the start of the US-led Afghan military operation and Obama was facing 30 senior congressional figures - Democrats and Republicans.  Former Republican presidential candidate hawkish Senator John McCain urged Obama to take heed of the advice given by generals on the ground. Divisions are emerging between some Democrats concerned by the prospect of deploying more US forces to Afghanistan and some Republicans urging the Obama administration to follow the advice of top generals and increase troop levels. President Obama told the group that his assessment would be "rigorous and deliberate" and that he would continue to work with Congress in the best interests of US and international security. He underscored his commitment to work on a collaborative basis.

War lords in USA are unhappy Obama did not pledge to increase troop numbers as his top general in Afghanistan wants or opt for a strategy of merely targeting al-Qaeda leaders. NATO chief terrorist in Afghanistan Gen McChrystal has described the situation in Afghanistan as "serious" and is believed to have requested up to 40,000 additional troops. He wants the focus of the strategy to fall on protecting the Afghan people and carrying the fight to the Taliban. Future US strategy will be discussed in a series of Obama administration meetings this week. President Obama has said the strategy in Afghanistan must be agreed before a decision can be made on troop numbers. By the end of 2009 there will be a total of 68,000 US troops in Afghanistan, based on current deployment plans. However, by way of appeasing all hawkish elements in USA and West at large, Obama said his review of Afghan strategy will not look at pulling out or cutting troop levels.

Anti-Islamic nations around the world waiting for signals from the global state terrorists occupying Islamic nations for call to send extra terrorists to kill Muslims there should be getting over-nervous now since the signals for White House to NATO rogues are not conducive to the ongoing terror wars. A few Neocons inspired Americans could, however, feel proud now that at least three of Muslim nations are under the brute control of their “democratic” terror military, they don’t want to feel let down by the new custodian of White House by revealing all hidden agendas of CIA-Pentagon-Mossad about the Sept11.  Such exposure as the wholesale exporters and perpetrators of state terrorism in Islamic world would make them feel small and insecure before the entire globe. But then they knew that Bush family com did every thing for American energy interests, for degrading Islam and torture and kill Muslims and promote Chrestian interests. The entire anti-Islamic nations have support them with troops and resources in US endeavors to defeat and kill Muslims, while booty is hared according to the strength of the nations, that is USA garners maximum of resources looted there. After all, democracy cannot be other wise. 

                                             II

The NATO Axis Evils supply materials to terror media to make panic scenario with false news, terror opinions supported by some fictitious photographs and videos produced by Hollywood. After all, the background for terror war in 2001 in Afghanistan was also created by the same team with UNSC-5 concurrence. Pentagon-CIA-Mossad controlled western media rogues place funny photos to spread the message of state terrorisms. NATO  paints a pathtic picltuire of increasingly emboldened Taliban and al-Qaeda in Afghanstan thretneing the very existnace of GST/IST global state terrorists. A new bogus propagnada is dong rounds in western meida aobut Taliban being better than Al-Quada and USA must take the help of both to quit Afghansitan without detoryng it competley.

NATO is pleasantly surprised with Chinese indirect support for genocides of Muslims in Afghanistan, Pakistan and Iraq. In Afghanistan, American and Chinese interests also converge. By exploiting Afghanistan’s metal and mineral reserves, China can provide thousands of Afghans with jobs, thus generating tax revenues to help stabilize a tottering Kabul government. China has its eyes on some of world’s last untapped deposits of copper, iron, gold, uranium and precious gems, and is willing to take big risks in one of the most violent countries to secure them. China has a vision of Afghanistan as a secure conduit for roads and energy pipelines that will bring natural resources from the Indian Ocean and elsewhere. So if America defeats Al Qaeda and the irreconcilable elements of the Taliban, China’s geopolitical position will be enhanced. The whole direction of America’s military and diplomatic effort is toward an exit strategy, whereas the Chinese hope to stay and profit.

USA has been keen get legitimacy of its illegal occupations by holding polls with terror military support. Voter turnout data kept confidential by the UN' chief envoy in Kabul after Afghanistan's disputed August presidential election show that in some provinces the official vote count exceeded the estimated number of voters by 100,000 or more, providing further indication that the contest was marred by fraud. In southern Helmand province -- where 134,804 votes were recorded, 112,873 of them for President Hamid Karzai -- the United Nations estimated that just 38,000 people voted, and possibly as few as 5,000, according to a U.N. spreadsheet obtained by The Washington Post. The disclosure of the data seems likely to worsen a credibility crisis for the U.N. special envoy, Kai Eide, who is already facing allegations that he sided with Karzai. Voter turnout data kept confidential by the United Nations' chief envoy in Kabul after Afghanistan's disputed August presidential election show that in some provinces the official vote count exceeded the estimated number of voters by 100,000 or more, providing further indication that the contest was marred by fraud.

The vote to make legitimacy for foreign occupation possible in Afghanistan has proven to be total farce with occupying forces and their allies seems to have voted in place of the Afghans without any identity sheets. After all terror NATO rogues were holding the poll there. The question arises now who then voted in Afghanistan Americans, Indians and other occupying nations? Were these votes cast even before the votes began? Has President Obama has any knowledge about western democracy works in Afghanistan and other occupied nations in Islamic world including Arab world where they occupy unofficially? Obviously it’s not Osama or WMD that made the NATO terror states to invade Afghanistan – there is no Osama and WMD was never allowed in Afghanistan even during the Soviet occupation. It is something else but now they are obstructing the Afghan routes thinking them to the future energy routes.

                                                III

Obama is certain that the NATO terror wars, unjust and illegal, have no meaning at all now. NATO terrorists argue for troops additions knowing too well the war has already failed and ended miserably; but the terror war continue because of availability of troops and weaponry plus the support from the puppet regimes there that fear the fascist occupiers.  This is then much more than simply a military strategy decision. It is a very big decision and it involves a great deal more than simply troop levels. There's a decision as to what strategy to pursue to halt the terror wars, how committed to leave Afghanistan, how to convince and deal with Nato and Isaf -International Assistance Security Force- allies, how to reshape the aid program - and how to deal with defenders of sovereignty like Al-Qaeda and Taliban to secure safe exit for the illegal occupiers the future of the Afghan government.

In a move to pacify the terror instincts of NATO forces, Obama said he would not reduce the troops. NATO rogues controlling Afghanistan along with about 30 more terror states think if they push for more troops Obama would try to reduce the troops in Afghanistan and Iraq and they can kill remaining Muslims as terrorists with help form willing terror partners like India. More pressure on Obama to add troops would lead to a panic situation in White House with Neocons making the White House bosses feel miserable with media highlighting false as real.  They now warn of warns of the consequences of delaying new action, whle Obama is considering the consequences of delaying the withdrawal of all American state terrorists from Afghanistan and elsehere.

Americans, Europeans, Asians, Chrestians, Jews, Hindus and the like have ganged up against Islam and Muslims. China offers big credits to US capitalists. USA thinks China need not be its future adversary. The problem is that while America is sacrificing its blood and treasure, the Chinese will reap the benefits.  Neocons suggest combining forces with China in Afghanistan might even improve the relationship between Washington and Beijing. Hence the push for bilateral military ties which annoys Russia though Moscow is also playing second fiddle to NATO. USA is thinking of a joint counterterrorism strategy focused mainly on the Afghanistan-Pakistan border.

President Obama must avoid lengthy delays in ending the illogical terror wars  in stead of deciding on a course of action and "convey determination" in its planning for the Af-Pak war theater. Obama is winding up an intensive review of U.S. policy toward Afghanistan and Pakistan and hopefully he woud quickly end the illegal  wars. If the US terror forces stay in Afghanistan and eventually succeed, other countries will benefit more than USA will. China, India and Russia are all Asian powers, geographically proximate to Afghanistan and better able, therefore, to garner practical advantages from any stability our armed forces would make possible. A withdrawal of any kind from Afghanistan before a stable government is in place would also hurt India, a critical if undeclared American ally, and increasingly a rival of China. Because of continuing unrest in the Islamic southern tier of the former Soviet Union, Moscow has an interest in America stabilizing Afghanistan. Many fear US would declines, by allowing others to take advantage of its own exertions. However a quick withdrawal would put at rest all calculations of India, Russia and other terror states trying to take maximum advantages form the ongoing g wars.

When the NATO Axis Evil states have destablized these three Muslms nations and weakened their statur, squnderee d their wealth and ensured energy supplies and routes, it is time interntinal community rose to occasion to defend the these antionss and save the remianing lives. UN Security Council , supposedly chagred with  the task of shelding the memeber-nations and peoples from any posible enemies, including state terorirsts, should proivde militlary equipment  to the defneders of soverignty  in Afghansitan, Iraq and Pakisatan agsint the foreing invaders under the guises of dmeocray change of regme WMD and Osama etc. Western fascist, insoired by regional terroirsts like Israel and India, have terror attacked these Islmac nations on fictitious pretexts to secure energy  sources and the routes. ICJ and ICC should step in on their own to investigate the hidden plans of CIA-Mossad-Pentagon  in allowing American terriritories for western terrorim killing innocent people enjoying life in the WTC. By making Muslsims as mostrous terorists, the state terroirsts are terrorizing the humanity. There's a delicate line for US president who can stop wars, of course, between rethinking and dithering. And the president and his team are aware that they have to avoid the latter at all costs to save humanity. 

  -----------------------

Dr. Abdul Ruff Colachal

Specialist on State Terrorism

Independent Columinst in International Affairs, Research Scholar (JNU) &

the only Indian to have gone through entire India, a fraud and terror nation in South Asia.