Multifaceted Fascism in Afghanistan: NATO-Russia Terror Realignment

 Dr. Abdul Ruff Colachal

[United States behaves now as the Unilateral State to deicde the global issues in favor of itself and its terror allies. One is not pretty sure if President Obama has already decided to carry forward, truthfully, the Bushdom legacy in external affairs to its logical tragic end. When the Obama began his Presidential camping, I did write the US foreign policy would not change much irrespective of who enters the White House, published by Middle East Online, etc., because without unilateral actions by projecting its deadly military supremacy, USA would not get what it wants from every region. Following a massive escalation of the war in Afghanistan, which will lead to an untold number of deaths, the "candidate of change" outlined a policy of unrestrained militarism and aggression in his Nobel Peace Prize speech last week….

Richard Barrett, the head of the UN unit monitoring the Taliban and al-Qaida and who leading the hunt for former Bush ally in terrorizing global Muslims, Osama Bin Laden, has warned against roguish NATO’s extrajudicial killing that the troop surge in Afghanistan' will give a boost to the Taliban. The shocking claim of the former MI6 agent comes at a time when deployment of 500 more British and 30,000 more American terror soldiers has been finalized to kill more Muslims in Afghanistan before the Christmas celebrations. It was confident that the different factions of the US political and media establishment could be brought on board behind a policy—dubbed by media commentators the “Obama Doctrine”—that both reiterates and extends that elaborated by the Bush administration. and the United States wants Berlin and its other allies to send up to 7,000 more terror troops. Germany's decision on troop levels has been clouded by a controversial German-ordered air strike in Afghanistan in September which Kabul says killed 30 civilians. Revelations about the Sept. 4 attack on two tankers in Kunduz triggered a row over a cover-up, and forced the resignation of then Defence Minister Franz Josef Jung. New German Defence Minister Karl-Theodor zu Guttenberg said the conflict in Afghanistan could not be won by military means and called for more development aid. He said NATO forces needed to find a "sensible way" to withdraw from Afghanistan, rather than rushing it. Germany already has about 4,400 terrorists in Afghanistan, the third largest contingent in the NATO mission after USA and UK].

PART ONE

As the world was expecting, under new US president of “change”, a quick withdrawal, of NATO terror troops from Afghanistan, the Obama administration has been coerced to commit for 30,000 more American terrorists. According to the Pentagon, the first of an additional terror troops ordered into Afghanistan by US President Barack Obama for killing Afghans have been unloaded in Kabul and 1,500 Marines are expected to be in place by Christmas celebrations by Chrestian terror forces in Afghanistan. The full force of 30,000 US state terrorists is scheduled to be deployed by the end of summer, with the buildup taking the total US contingency to 98,000.

Since it had been driven out of Afghanistan by the Afghans with US assistance, Russia has been one of the pestering forces behind US-led NATO terror invasion of Afghanistan, although so far there is no conclusive evidence to show that Russian also collaborated for the Sept-11 event in USA because it wanted to put an end to US support for Chechen freedom struggle made extremely terrorist by the Kremlin provocative terror strategies. Not only Russia readily supports US terrorism in Afghanistan but even asked the Central Asian puppet regimes to open their air fields for NATO operations against Muslims in Afghanistan and Pakistan.

After arriving the White House on “change” campaign, President Obama, playing "unhealthy" at home, is slowly opening up his mind to the outside world by revealing himself as a “war president” and his message is as US president he cannot be the savior of the world, much less of the Islamic nations, because he has to advance the US global interests as the chief of the White house and he has Bushdom terror legacy to his credit apart from Nobel Prize for dramatics. The June speech in Cairo, in which the US president quoted from the Holy Quran and said America will “never” be at war with Islam was meant to soften the hardness of Muslims against the US imperialism in Islamic world killing millions of innocent Muslims as terrorists according to the Pentagon-Mossad-CIA-RAW hidden agendas.

Not very long ago, U.S. President Barack Obama, under pressure from the Pentagon and NATO terror leaders as well global anti-Islamic nations, announced he planned to send an additional 30,000 U.S. terror soldiers to Afghanistan. As he accepted his Nobel Peace Prize in Oslo’ he defended the US role in Afghanistan, President Obama has said the US must uphold moral standards when waging wars that are necessary and justified, arguing the use of force could bring lasting peace. In fact he has not achieved any accomplishments, except the Nobel Prize as a war president. "The instruments of war do have a role to play in preserving the peace," Obama declared. The USA reserves the right to "act unilaterally if necessary" and to launch wars whose purpose "extends beyond self-defense or the defense of one nation against an aggressor." Asked by 60 Minutes on Sunday how he could make the decision to escalate the war in Afghanistan when the majority of Americans oppose it, Obama replied: "That's my job". Obama, received a diploma, a medal and 10m kroner ($1.4m; £865,000) one is not sure  if he thinks this advance amount for adding more terror troops to kill people in Afghanistan and Pakistan.

Eloquent with good phrases and bristling with imperialist arrogance, Obama’s speech amounted to a full-throated defense of US aggression and a brief for the unlimited use of military violence to decolonize large parts of the world. Delivered by a president who only a week before had announced an escalation of the war in Afghanistan and Pakistan that will lead to the deaths of many thousands, the speech essentially asserted the right of the United States to invade any country in the world. The White House clearly decided to use Obama’s Nobel acceptance speech as an opportunity to stage an international defense of American militarism and imperialist war. The instruments of war do have a role to play in preserving the peace,” Obama insisted. Obama says the USA has the right to "act unilaterally if necessary" and to launch wars whose purpose "extends beyond self-defense." This was a reassertion of the Bush administration’s doctrine of preemptive war, which is a violation of international law. Speaking in Oslo, he singled out as potential targets a series of countries, including Iran, North Korea, Somalia, Sudan, Congo, Zimbabwe and Myanmar.

Recently, UK prime terrorist Gordon Brown visited British terror troops in Afghanistan killing Muslims, even during the Holy Ramazan month, to show his support in the run-up to Christmas, held talks with Afghan President Hamid Karzai in Kandahar and said the next few months would be "critical" and urged the Afghan government to take a bigger role in confronting the Taliban. But he did spell out the “bigger role” assigned to Afghan puppet leader. Brown slept in "basic quarters" at the Kandahar air base, the HQ of Nato syndicate terror troops in the south of the country. UK accounts for more than one third of deaths of Afghan Muslims. Brown said his Afghan counterpart had offered to send 10,000 extra Afghan troops to be trained against a free Afghanistan in Helmand, where most of the British terror forces are based. UK terror premier acknowledged that casualty numbers had been high and paid tribute to their "bravery, professionalism and dedication".

PART TWO

Relations between NATO and Moscow have improved significantly since they were frozen for six months in the aftermath of last year's Russia-Georgia war. Moscow has repeatedly expressed its willingness to help the war effort in Afghanistan, due to fears that any return to power by Taliban extremists would destabilize Central Asia and endanger Russia's own security. Russia has allowed NATO nations to use its territory for the overland transport of supplies to Afghanistan. NATO commanders have been pushing for shipment of supplies to the growing international force in Afghanistan via this route because the normal supply route to the landlocked nation through Pakistan has come under repeated Taliban attacks. The Russians also have trained thousands of Afghan anti-narcotics police officers at a training center near Moscow. The new Afghan army numbers nearly 100,000 men but is scheduled to expand to 134,000 by next October, with another 100,000 troops to be added over the next three years. The USA and its NATO allies have more than 100,000 soldiers in Afghanistan — about 71,000 of them Americans — where they are struggling to regain the initiative from the resurgent guerrillas. They will be joined next year by 30,000 American and 7,000 European reinforcements.

Moscow supports NATO terrorism in Afghanistan to avenge its defeat almost two decade back. Russia fought a disastrous 10-year war in Afghanistan before withdrawing in 1989. It has sold small arms and other weapons systems to the internationally backed Afghan government for several years and provided $220 million worth of military aid including aviation equipment, an air-defense system for Kabul airport, communications gear, vehicles, repair equipment and spare parts. Last month, Moscow sold four Mi-17 medium-lift transport helicopters to the Afghan air force — the first new planes delivered to Afghanistan in two decades. the Afghan army — which is already overwhelmingly equipped with Russian arms — would need more machine guns and rocket-propelled grenade launchers, and especially tens of thousands of Kalashnikov AK-47 assault rifles, along with field artillery guns and armored vehicles. The AK-47 remains the preferred automatic weapon of both Taliban insurgents and the security forces because of its power.

Furious disputes over Russia's actions during its war with Georgia last year plunged Moscow-NATO ties to a post-Cold War low, but NATO chief terrorist Rasmussen has sought to restore cooperation with Russia since taking office in August. After Russia angered NATO by sending its troops into Georgia in August 2008 and unilaterally recognizing the independence of two rebel Georgian regions, the USA and Russia already have a similar deal on sending troops and military equipment to Afghanistan via flights over Russian airspace, reached during US President Barack Obama's visit to Moscow in July. Rasmussen on 15 Dec hailed a "new beginning" in the transatlantic alliance's relations with Moscow after they were badly strained by last year's Georgia crisis. Rasmussen was aiming to rebuild trust with Russia at the high-level talks, on the first visit by a head of the Western alliance since the Georgia crisis. Rasmussen would be seeking to expand an arrangement which NATO uses to ship supplies to Afghanistan by railroad via Russia.

The overland transit deal agreed in April 2008 only permits NATO to ship non-lethal cargoes, but Rasmussen wanted Moscow's blessing to ship weapons as well. NATO is now making requests to introduce a similar simplified regime for the transit of lethal supplies, that is, arms and ammunition, which would be shipped across our territory by rail The importance of transit via Russia and ex-Soviet Central Asia has grown over the past year as insurgent attacks on military convoys have become more frequent in Pakistan, Afghanistan's neighbour to the south. Moscow and NATO have gradually been resuming high-level contacts in recent months after they were broken off amid Russia's war with ex-Soviet Georgia, which had sought to join the Western military alliance.

For months now, NATO had planned to ask Russia, the root cause of Afghan war and genocides of innocent Afghans for years now, to contribute more to the escalating Afghan war by donating AK-47 assault rifles, grenade launchers, artillery, armored vehicles and other weapons to the expanding Afghan army. New chief Anders Fogh Rasmussen on his first visit to Moscow will focus on Afghanistan in meetings with President Dmitry Medvedev and Prime Minister Vladimir Putin. NATO extremist diplomats said there are plans to ask Russia in coming months for donations of weapons systems and others items such as fuel for the Afghan security forces. Kremlin officials had suggested further cooperation is likely, but have ruled out sending any troops. Russians also have complained that NATO has not been keeping them informed about its plans for the war, saying improved cooperation was essential for the success of the mission.

PART THREE - A Word with fellow Muslims

Anti-Islamic fascism led by the western so-called “democracies” has been on the rampage for nearly a decade now in the Islamic world. Afghanistan is being ruined by over 44 terror nations from East and West, both Muslim and anti-Muslim. Russia's direct entry into Afghan terror scene could further aggravate the situation further, complicating all NATO efforts to ensure energy routes by killing people living along the line. One may prefer to laugh at it, but the WW-III is indeed on and the target of this terror war is Islam and Muslims. The world is now likely to witness a continuous increase of troops in Afghanistan – British, French, Canadian, German, Italian, Australian, Japanese, etc. – and with India preparing to attack simultaneously from the East, Pakistan will be surrounded from both sides. Israel would lie carefully concealed in waiting until the very last moment when she would come out from behind the curtains to spear-head missile attacks on Pakistan’s nuclear plants. Then with perhaps as many as half of a million NATO troops invading from the west, and an equal number of Indian troops invading from the east, it is going to be such a bloody and messy affair that it can possibly result in massive violent anti-western uprisings against governments in the entire (pro-western) world of Muslim client-States.

The western hawkish media lords engaged by the global state terror leaders still claim if the US led NATO terror forces quit Afghanistan, the Afghans would follow them right up to Washington probably by the next American flight. This is media mischief is being systematically generated to force US president not to stop terror wars n Islamic world for some more years, at least, until all energy goals of USA and Europe are met. This falsified campaign against Afghans and Muslim should be thrown at the faces of these media lords and western leaders with a note: Afghans id not follow the Soviet terror troops when they quit Afghanistan in 1990s and there is no needed for panic now on that. Afghans   have better thanks to do when the western rogue states withdraw their terror troops than following those mindless mads.

Obama talks about just war but the question is why at all against the innocent Afghans? The evolution of humanism, as opposed to Obamaism, underscores the fact that a genuine movement against imperialist war must develop in opposition to the defenders of the Obama administration, the Democratic Party and American capitalism.  Obviously, Obama's Nobel Peace Prize speech has been hailed virtually unanimously across the entire spectrum of the unilateral American political establishment seeking to establish universal US Empire after the completion of Mideast hegemony through genocides of Muslims. The unmasking of Obama before the entire world has not in any way lessened the support he receives from the world.

US-led NATO of Evils prolong their terror tactics in Afghanistan, Pakistan and Iraq on the tacit support they receive from some rogue Muslim nations as well. Most of the so-called Islamic organizations around the world are in fact anti-Islamic supporting USA, Europe, India and Israel. Bulks of newspapers run by Muslims are also being used by western media nuts against Islam. Pro-American Islamic organization is doing disservice to Islam and harming the interests of Muslims. It must be particularly hurtful to that westernized and secularized elite, both in and out of Pakistan, that essays such as this should be penned by scholars of Islam who are unafraid to proclaim the truth in the faces of the world’s greatest tyrants." The US President Obama’s recent announcement of a dramatic increase in US troops to be sent to occupied-Afghanistan was camouflaged with psychological ploys. This was hardly surprising since those who truly control power in USA – power to choose someone, anoint him and make him President – are a people who have PhDs in deception.

Obama's decision to deploy an additional 30,000 troops somehow resembles former Soviet President M. Gorbachev's decision to deploy an additional 40,000 Soviet troops in 1985. The Soviet Union was a superpower with common borders with Afghanistan while America is a distant power dependent on Pakistan for transit facilities and 120,000 Soviet troops could not defeat the brave Afghans. Soviet Union had to pack off and US-led NATO also will have face the fate sooner than later even with Russian support. Imperialist war is rooted in the capitalist system. As the economic crisis intensifies and aggressive war expands, the Afghan working class will emerge as the leading political force in the opposition to terror war and neo-imperialism. The critical task is the construction of a political leadership based on the understanding that the fight against war must be an international struggle linked to the socialist reorganization of society.  Otherwise it would be the domestic capitalists who benefit by blocking the freedom struggle of Afghans and backing transnational colonialist capitalists at home. Obama shall have to bear the brunt.

The US Pentagon and its Obama tool must also be getting ready to escalate war  to Pakistan proper, beyond Af-Pak even as Pakistani president is rustling with after effects of court ruling against him. Muslims around the world must demand the severance of diplomatic and consular relations with all such countries whose troops are waging war in Afghanistan and in other parts of the Muslim world. Muslim readers should protect themselves from such radio, television and newspapers that are mere propaganda mouthpieces of those now poised to attack Pakistan. Pakistani Muslims must lose no time in ridding themselves of the pro-American political and military leaders and information/news czars imposed upon them by their enemies. After all, their enemies would not have invested so much in promoting a 2012 ‘doomsday’ had there not been sinister designs to exploit it to their advantage. Christian state terrorists cannot enjoy their Chrestmas while killing the innocent Muslims around!

  -----------------------

Dr. Abdul Ruff Colachal

Specialist on State Terrorism

Independent Columnist in International Affairs, Research Scholar (JNU) & the only Indian to have gone through entire India, a fraud and terror nation in South Asia.