Unilateralism the American style!

_________________________

Of course, every regime, elected or self-appointed, today behaves unilaterally, disregarding the essential norms of official dignity and misuse power to the maximum extent. However with regard to its actions abroad most powers are handicapped its limited resources abroad as foreign powers are extremely strong. 

Unilateralism belongs only to US super power and all other powers, including its close strategic partner Britain must obey  the orders from Washington. it is the prerogative of the  America and its allies operating under NATO can invade and attack other nations.  No other nation or organization can have that special privilege. 

Only USA can make decisions for the world and undertake unilateral terror attacks unilaterally. No other nation, except those with the UNSC veto facility, can exercise that option. Americans do not wage wars directly with Russia or other veto powers. 

The horrible ramifications of the  Sept-11 hoax  strategically played by enemies of Islam by using the  Al-Qaeda led by one Osama bin Laden who also was  reportedly a CIA operative to execute the orders of  his masters,  in the form of destabilization of  many Muslims nations stating with an Islamizing Afghanistan.

Death toll of Sept-11 hoax today is millions of innocent Muslims causing slashing of Muslim populations. 

From an easy  'victory" in Afghanistan, the USA and allies have fearlessly passed through, looting and destroying many Muslims that are blessed with energy resources and routes, killing millions of Muslims, consuming the dead bodies and their blood at will. 

In the process the Pentagon and allies faced terrible opposition from Iran and Syria., both being shielded by the powerful Kremlin with its weapons systems. Interestingly, these two nations have survived all US terror strategies, despite the active support from Arab world, led by Saudi Arabia which is duty  bound to protect global Muslims and defend Islam.

Unfortunately, like some jungle beasts do, Arab nations neither protect Muslims nations nor let countries like Turkey and Iran to do the same for the sake of  existence of Islam. The best example is Turkey's effort to free Palestinians of terror blockades of Israel-Egypt terror twins. 

Today, the dreadful scenario is emerging where Arab nations are promoting the anti-Islamic forces of the western terrocracies.

From Al-Qaeda to ISIS,  every organization only also serves the cause of USA and other enemies of Islam. The strong perception that ISIS is also a creation of Washington elements to terrorize Muslims and defame Islam cannot be overruled. 

President Barack Obama, in pursuing US global interests, including energy cum routes requirements, has announced his military would track the ISIS.  Many take it as a mild joke. 

Entire world, in particular Syria knew the stated ISIS attack idea of Obama is meant to destabilize Damascus and  remove president  Assad  from power.  USA is eager to prolong its illegal war in Mideast and Syria remains the target of White House, officially in order to appease the  Sunni Arab world.  Already Obama's announcement has been praised by Saudi rulers because that saved somehow the wounded prestige of Saudi Arabia badly seeking to destroy Shiite nations and make  Sunni Islam world.  By suing this kind of  pickle mindset of Saudi  Arabia, the USA wants to kill as many Muslims as possible , both Shiites and Sunnis and destabilize entire Islamic world, including Saudi Arabia   - the target of final nail of the anti-Islamic western terrocracies. .

President Barack Obama has long been wary of getting dragged into the bloody and complex Syrian civil war that the United Nations says has killed more than 190,000 people. He has resisted intervening militarily in the conflict, even after a deadly chemical weapons attack a year ago that Washington blamed on President Bashar Assad's government. But the extremist group's rampage across wide swaths of Iraq, declaration of a state governed by their harsh interpretation of Islamic law in territory spanning the Iraq-Syria border, and grisly beheading of an American journalist, have injected a new dynamic into those calculations. Now, Obama faces pressure from his own military leaders to go after the extremists inside Syria. A White House official said Obama authorized surveillance flights over Syria, a move that could pave the way for U.S. airstrikes. The official who confirmed the decision was not authorized to discuss Obama's decision publicly by name, and insisted on anonymity.

Syria's government has long described the rebels fighting to topple Assad as "terrorists" in a foreign conspiracy. Speaking in Damascus, Syrian Foreign Minister Walid al-Moallem appeared acutely aware of how much has changed since last August, when the USA was threatening to carry out punitive airstrikes against Assad's government in the pretext of the chemical attack.  However, USA got exposed before the world  as the cause of the chemical attack that was most probably  engineered by US supported  Syrian rebel opposition army. Since then, global disapproval has shifted away from Assad and toward the Islamic extremists who are fighting him and spreading destruction across Syria and Iraq.  Al-Moallem told reporters his government is ready "to cooperate and coordinate" with any side, including the USA, or join any regional or international alliance against the Islamic State group. But he said any US military action inside Syria should be coordinated with the Syrian government. "Any strike which is not coordinated with the government will be considered as aggression," he said. He said Damascus has warned repeatedly of the threat of terrorism and the need to cut off resources and funding, but "no one listened to us." Al-Moallem's news conference came a day after jihadis captured a major military air base in northeastern Syria, eliminating the last government-held outpost in a province otherwise dominated by the Islamic State group. After several failed attempts, Islamic State fighters stormed the Tabqa air base, killing dozens of troops inside. Al-Moallem conceded defeat in Tabqa, controlled by the Islamic State group, including fighters honking noisily as they drove in cars carrying the group's black-and-white flags.

Meanwhile, Syria said it was ready to help confront the rising threat from the Islamic State group, but warned the United States against carrying out airstrikes without Damascus' consent, saying any such attack would be considered an aggression. In seeking to portray itself as a partner for the international community, Syria seemed intent on capitalizing on the growing clamor among some U.S. officials, including military leaders, to expand the current American air campaign against the Islamic extremists in Iraq and to hit them in Syria as well.

USA seems to be keen to attack Syria on the ISIS or ISIL pretext. Obama, perhaps for official records, therefore has called on US Congress to give additional authorities and resources to train and equip the anti-Islamic fighters. In the fight against ISIL, Washington, Obama says, cannot rely on an Assad regime that terrorizes its people; a regime that will never regain the legitimacy it has lost. Instead, we must strengthen the opposition as the best counterweight to extremists like ISIL, while pursuing the political solution necessary to solve Syria’s crisis once and for all.

This is an interesting development since Washington wants to authorize airstrikes against the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) or ISIS on Syrian territory. It is a move that the Assad government and Russia say that would be an act of aggression and a breach of International law.

The USA wants Assad out of power. The USA has been supporting the Syrian rebels right from the start to remove Assad. Many of them joined the Islamic State, Al-Qaeda, Al-Nusra and other terrorist groups in the region including those in Iraq. ISIL was created by the USA and its allies in the region. The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights reported that moderate and Islamist rebels had signed a ceasefire deal for the first time in a suburb of the capital Damascus. The two parties will respect a truce until a final solution is found, and they promise not to attack each other because they consider the principal enemy to be Assad’s government and his forces - The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights reported that moderate and Islamist rebels had signed a ceasefire deal for the first time in a suburb of the capital Damascus. “The two parties will respect a truce until a final solution is found, and they promise not to attack each other because they consider the principal enemy” to be Assad’s government and his forces - the Nussayri regime. Nussayri is a pejorative term for the Alawite sect, an offshoot of Shiite Islam to which President Bashar al-Assad belongs. They forgot to mention that the USA and other Western allies consider the Assad government their enemy as well

Washington would welcome a truce between both groups because they will target the Syrian government. Online news organization Middle East Eye reported that both moderate Syrian rebels and the Islamic State’s common enemy is the Assad government. Will the mainstream media report this peace agreement between these two organizations? Washington will most likely launch airstrikes against these same terrorists in Syria as a justification to enter Syrian territory. However, if the USA does launch airstrikes into Syria to target these terrorist organizations, it will be considered an aggression against the Assad government. If innocent civilians or Syrian government forces are killed in the airstrikes, the Assad government would most likely respond with military action. Russia, China and most nations around the world would condemn US actions on Syria’s sovereign territory.

Most analysts view the emerging scenario with USA being determined to relaunch war on Syria as the start of World War III.

The Syrian government can defeat ISIL on their own if Washington would stop sending arms into the region.

The world needs to stop this war.

In Moscow, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov  said Western nations that long refused to condemn Assad's enemies were now coming to realize the threat posed by the Islamic State group. The West, he said, will "have to choose what is more important: to change the regime and satisfy personal antipathies with the risk that the situation will crumble, or find pragmatic ways to join efforts against the common threat, which is the same for all of us — terrorism." Moscow has been a close ally of Damascus for decades, and has provided it with weapons and funding to help support Assad throughout the current conflict. 

Syria's offer aims to take advantage of current events in Iraq, and the corresponding shift in American and European attitudes about Assad and the Islamic State extremists. The Syrian government is trying to say they are on the same side as the international community. What the Syrians have tried to make is that they are fighting pure terrorism.

The Americans might find themselves forced to cooperate under the table with the Syrians against the rebels, giving Assad an easy victory. . But Arab countries will not accept Syria as a member of the club fighting the Islamic State.

Many even accuse the USA and Assad government of facilitating the ISIS group's rise at the expense of more mainstream rebel factions. The breakaway al-Qaida group is the most powerful faction fighting Assad's forces, which means a USA campaign to weaken the Islamic State extremists could actually strengthen a leader the White House has sought to push from office.

Obama could try to counteract that awkward dynamic by targeting both ISIS and Assad's forces, though that could drag the USA into the bloody, complex conflict — something he has studiously tried to avoid.

White House reveals that Obama has not made a decision on whether to take military action inside Syria, but noted that the president has demonstrated his willingness to take military action to protect American citizens. It is felt that any US strikes against the Islamic State could have the unintended consequence of bolstering the Syrian government

Despite warnings from Assad, Russia and China against unilateral USA airstrikes, someone at White House takes a bet that there is little the Assad government could do should Obama regime decide to target the Muslim extremists inside Syria. 

Syria says the Americans support as well as oppose the ISIS simultaneously.

Needless to state here that US power remains the strongest military power and hence goes all out for unilateral attacks. Washington also, at the same time, takes special care not to antagonize or annoy Russia beyond certain usual rhetoric acceptable to Moscow.  Washington has already convinced Russia that it would never seek a direct war with it. 

As it stands, only Russia can effectively challenge USA and hence Washington uses some economic tools to restrain Moscow and nothing more. Both have been coordinating their operations worldwide, although for the sake of diplomatic expediency, USA is fighting both Russia and China..  . . 

World has seen that American unilateralism has its own limitations. US unilateralism has not won anything tangibly, though could murder millions of innocent humans, destroyed property worth trillions, and destabilized many Muslim nations, contributed to the fast climatic change process.

Intelligence wings and media of the western terrocracies are yet to reveal the facts and figures about worth of the totally looted valuables, including oil and gold, and other properties from Islamic world in the pretext of war on terror.