NATO would not allow peace globally!

-Dr. Abdul Ruff

____________

The task of North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) has been to provide security to all member countries from enemies and even allies like Israel (which is increasingly becoming a fascist terror state) and shield their individual as well as collective crimes.

NATO is a deadly threat to humanity and world peace, serious existential threat to Muslim nations and their resources.  Like the dangerous global warming, the NATO  terror wars escalate  environmental disorders, making life on earth dangerous.   

With the fall of the Berlin Wall and Soviet Union and socialist system in Europe, American leaders declared Russia as a friend and ally. However, they refused to dismantle the terror spitting NATO structure. It is because USA wants to use NATO as the formidable terror organization to bully the world.

Strategic specialists have been writing NATO's obituary since about two years after it was formed in 1949 to fight communism and equally powerful Soviet Union that challenged the superpower’s militarism policies for maintaining global hegemony USA secured from WW-I.

The problem with the west and its forces including NATO is that they don`t believe and don’t want that others exist as fully sovereign nations.  The most powerful West (NATO) believes they have every domineering power and therefore neglect and scorn others with disregard and make no room to learn from others. USA wants others to fear its super power status and pentagon. They get taken by surprise and embarrassed any time they see something like a challenge from others. 

Upon the disastrous misadventures in Afghanistan and Arab world, they are getting a serious lesson now and should take correction otherwise it would have been a disaster to them had the lesson been given to them through serious combat.

NATO ceased being relevant the day the Soviet Union dissolved itself.  It does now, however, have three new tasks. 1. To provide political cover for American aggression.2.To scan every word said by every Russia official at any level to find an implied threat to any NATO country. 3. To hold a daily news conference in which it claims, falsely, that Russia has threatened nuclear war, again, and will roll tanks into Berlin by Christmas unless NATO is vigilant. 4. To maintain and increase cold war tension so that NATO continues to be funded and the US has excuses to purchase expensive new hardware.

The alliance had a clear raison d'être when it was formed in '49, but did not need one in order to persist in the post-Cold War era and it's interesting that NATO not only continued to exist through the 90s, but also managed to expand not only its overall mission (the Bosnia & Kosovo ops, among other items), but its membership as well, and all of this was done precisely when no great threat to Euro security existed. Why should a military alliance persist, then expand in many ways, when it has no discernible enemy? Why would so many nations line up to join an alliance when they have no discernible enemy?

While the fear complex the west, controlled by capitalists and imperialist war mongers, is supposedly suffering is a mere mischief intended to contain Russia all the time. While the Kremlin used to try to influence European nations  to embrace communist ideology and values, after the collapse of Soviet union, it  has totally abandoned that along with  the Warsaw pact that fought the NATO. However, Russia’s fear about NATO expansionism and US militarism is real as they can do anything to protect their territories from any NATO attacks. Russians do not believe that Americans would ever change their anti-Russia mindset. Russia is no more a communist or socialist nation. But there is, of course, no actual chance that Russia will attack any NATO nation. They have never threatened any NATO nation and have absolutely no reason to do so, but if NATO can keep the hysteria at a high enough level, they keep getting their paychecks.’

The ironic truth was that in 2011 Afghanistan didn't attack USA, nor did Iraq in 2003. In 9/11 hoax the USA openly claimed the attacked was “done” by people from Saudi Arabia. USA should've attacked Saudi Arabia but it did not.  Remember what G. Bush said: "No country harboring terrorists wouldn't go unpunished" But not Saudi Arabia - Royal family is our "dear friend" So, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Libya, Egypt, Iraq even Iran are paying for the “sins” of Saudi Arabia. Obviously, then, USA along with Israel engineered the Sept-11 hoax for which Saudi Arabia lent its support in all respects, including finances.

Possibly, many Americans think Russia had engineered the Sept-11 hoax as part of winning the rivalry with USA. They believe Russia has taught a valuable lesson to them. Russia had lost the WW-II to USA and then lost the Cold War also to USA again. The attacks well inside the USA would have given Russia the much needed victory and over all moral advantage.  Although there  were reports of terror attacks inside Russia a few years after the Sept-11 hoax, those are of less important as they could not make Sept-11  meaningless. Even the blasts in India, an emerging strategic partner of USA, could not outwit the Sept-11 hoax.

True, the NATO is one of the world's most potent fighting forces and anyone who thinks we don't need after watching Putin is in denial, ignorant of history or just plain clueless. They have kept the peace all these years between Russia and its members.

General James Jones, USMC (Ret.), former Supreme Allied Commander Europe Washington Examiner, said on Oct. 19, 2015 "I think it's possibly the beginning of the end of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO). Almost since its inception in Washington D.C. in April 1949, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization has been at one crossroads or another in which its demise was imminent. But, despite crises such as Suez and Eastern Europe in 1956; the Cuban Missile Crisis in 1962; Leonid Brezhnev's ruthless end to the Prague Spring in 1968; the October 1973 Arab-Israeli War in which America and Russia almost collided; the Euro Missile crisis of the early 1980's; and the end of the Cold War, NATO endured.

After the Soviet Union imploded due mainly to NATO‘s hidden operations to collapse the Union and  the equality system Russia was aiming at,  NATO's core task of defending against a Warsaw Pact attack disappeared.

Western powers refuse to admit that the NATO is a dinosaur of the cold war era and after its mandate was pretty much gone in 1991, it was used solely for US aggression against any state that didn't accept American bullying. Sad but true. Is the world so dim-witted as to have forgotten WWI, WWII, Bosnia, and current threats?

 As long as East and West oppose each other, the alliance will remain. The North Atlantic Treaty Organization is very relevant.

There is, of course, no actual chance that Russia will attack any NATO nation. They have never threatened any NATO nation and have absolutely no reason to do so, but if NATO can keep the hysteria at a high enough level, they keep getting their paychecks.

NATO's persistence after the Cold War has no meaning except that it wants to terrorize the world.

(More to follow>)