Why Australian victory in Baroda ODI Upset great India?  

[Is it because the match was pre-fixed in favor of great India that Indian media are terribly upset about the disastrous rout of great India at the  hands of Australians in India too?

On the face it the first ODI was nothing unusual about it, it was just a  match which Australia won after a big battle, but then the very long “battle” also suggests a big rat, it  shows it wasn’t a match but mimicry show by Australia in India.

It appears the outcome of the first ODI between Aus-India teams on 25 October in Vadodara (Baroda) was unexpected to Indians as well as the teams. Have the Cricket mafias also lost the match along with Indians, the spectators and commentators? Have the Austrians played double-locking an innocent India? ]

                                 I

Upon winning the toss Australians made 292 runs in 50 overs and Indians lost hopes almost wholly and only looked in contempt at the piled cricketers and semi-explosives reserved for celebrating the Indian victory and great defeat for Aussies, but then fortunes stated shifting at times they offered enough hopes for a possible Indian resurrection; But again Australia took two quick wickets, heavily priced at that, of Sachin and Sehwag, quickly dashing all hopes of Hindus and their Muslim co-conspirators in the country. Then Indian wickets fell at regular intervals making Indian spectators feel extremely restless and hot, but unable to leave their seats because that would amount to ditching the poor great India and their players half way through. Then came the relief package from Australia by way of delivering quick runs to the hosts after the fall of their seventh wicket! And the spectators and other Indians and pro-Indians were not only relived of a dirty defeat but also felt they would get the chance of blasting the reserved semi-explosives and terror crackers. Australians then let them know they were only keeping the Indians in good humours and with straight hits they send the Indian team and spectators to the weeping rooms, leaving the semi-explosives unattended; they still remain unused, hoping for Australian help from Sydney. Shane Watson won't want to watch the replay of his final overs; he became predictable with his full tosses outside off and when he sent down the 49th of the innings it cost Australia 20 runs.

So, after the fall of all important wickets for paltry runs, what happened, who knows, Australia delayed their game and played sort of practice trying to get one more wicket leisurely, offering in the process good runs to Indians. At 201 for seven in their pursuit of a 293-run victory target, India seemed heading for a comprehensive defeat before the tails Praveen (40 not out) and Harbhajan (49) came.  The feisty 84-run stand from tails was most unexpected even for themselves after India fell to 201 for 7 with ten overs remaining, when they needed more than nine an over. Finally, the visiting Australian team thrashed hosts India to be the maiden winner of the first ODI in a one of most spectacular, but mischievous cricket matches.  India agonizingly was close to a sensational win before the hosts slumped to a four-run defeat against Australia in the first match of the seven-ODI series on 25 October.

If the best way to spark interest in a seven-match ODI series is to stage a brilliantly tense opener, then Australia and India achieved their goal in Vadodara. Australia repelled a late fightback to prevail by four runs in the first ODI against India in Vadodara. In the end, nine were required from the final over and Peter Siddle held his nerve to confirm a four-run margin in Australia's favour. The key moment came when Harbhajan (49) was bowled from the second ball of the 50th, trying to launch a boundary off Siddle. Six from the last ball was too much for India, though many hoped the guests would offer a flat sixer to appease the ungrateful Indians. If the Australians did give a final sixer to make India look bigger in size and actions, none in India would have thanked the visitors for their magnanimous gesture. Media, on the contrary, would have blasted the news about faked India cricket power.  

Obviously, Australia went for a bollywood thriller show by prolonging the match when the victory was sited with the fall of all important wickets in 40 overs. Perhaps it has been the usual practice between joint partners in cricket matches. In fact the Aussies could have easily clinched the ODI with 30-50 runs lead. But they won it just by 4 runs. The match gave an impression that Australians would not win the match if Indians also did not lose 8 wickets that they themselves lost. After offering Harbajan 49 they just removed him denying him 50 and then quickly wound up the match by winning the show. Conversely, it would mean if eighth wicket were not forthcoming, Australian would have preferred to lose the match. That is cricket. Is it a part of betting activities? Obviously many pro-Indian have lost huge resources just for fun hoping to win the match against a joint partner Australia. All cricketers seek extra cash by fooling the paid spectators which is illegal, immoral and such nefarious hidden agendas should be banned.   

The behind the eighth wicket, there is a big game plan as Australia cold have got the eight wicket pretty sooner than later if that were the case without letting many runs flowing into Indian kitty.  But the real motto was to prolong the match by offering more runs to India and creating the thriller scene that attracts the Indian audience when they had lost all hopes and results were foretold by the sport media about India badly losing the first match- a bad omen for Hindu mindset.  

                                   II

Known for their fanaticism and doublespeaks, Indian media and almost everybody is upset if and when something bag happens to a Hindu enjoying life abroad whereas India has plenty of citizens, including Hindus, begging on the streets, practicing criminal activities and killing others and many people die of hunger and malnutrition, but the media do not consider them as worthy Hindus to critics the responsible guys.  Indian criminal media as usual are championing the old cause of making Indian sport troops of Hindus exclusive, probably asking the Muslims to play for Pakistan and Bangladesh. They want Muslims, if by chance selected by the agency, to score 100s quickly and let others play to score more; and take a few quick wickets to prove their worth in Indian teams. The media do not find fault with the openers Sachin and Sehwag, a Delhiite, because both are the pampered cricket men of India, its media and mafia. Had a Muslim be one of the openers, then, the nasty Indian media would have made derogatory remarks about him and blaming the selectors for the rout right at the beginning. While absence of Yuv was badly belt by the media, -- was just ignored because Indian notorious media do not want to give any credit whatsoever for a Muslim though international sport media said Zahir Khan's absence would affect Hindu fortunes. It is not that the absence or presence of any player would indeed turn upside down the fortunes. Not at all. This is all media hypes to terrorize innocent Indians. Sachem’s presence and opening the match brought basket full of bad smell to Indian media and commentators, but they don’t admit the bad smell. Indian media found fault with Doni's captaincy almost wanted to throw him out, but Dony has blamed the batsmen for the blows. They just blame Dhone, but their favorites also could not manage enough runs or wickets.

The deadly disappoint of Indians show there was an agreement as par to the series package for Australia to lose the first ODI. Australia scored 292 even though it seemed they would easily cross 300. Indian lost 7 wickets, the major ones of any consequences, but the eighth wicket was allowed to prolong to enable India to get some quick runs to make the match competitive somewhat. If this pro-India trend is cultivated further it would be another joint cricket exercises which removed them from the world's top slot as the champs. Once again they would lose it ... 

Australian cricket was indeed fantastic as four the batsmen got 50 plus and Hussy made 79 in just 54 balls to clinch the  man of the match  trophy along with Hyundai Hero ( karishma). However, it has become a recent phenomenon to remove all important batsmen without problems deny them any good runs, the tails are given plenty of runs. If this mischief is not match-fixing, what is it? As it has become the practice of cricket teams, Australia began playing with the patience with the spectators and mischief against the cricket mafia of India, big capitalists who sponsor the series as well as the media cum state commentators. The ordinary public had to intervene to ring up to the AIR (anti-Islamic radio) specialists not to hang over with a negative result. India cheats its own Muslims employees in all possible ways.

                               III

A very important issue needs to be thrashed out right here. In South Africa where fanatic India were thrown out of the series without even letting them get into semi level, there was a big hue and cry that Pakistan intentionally let Australia to win and enter the semifinals, thereby denying India to enter even from backdoor. If this logic is extended here, India has allowed Australia to win by enacting a big movie masaala chase and anti-climax. That again is not sport, but may be a good friendly spirit, but if that is not Ok for Pakistan, is it then good for India because it is a democratic fanatic. Question is: will Hindu Indians appreciate or let any other team win? Indians have yet to learn the basic ethics of giving due credit to the opponents in a sport in stead of sticking to the old habit of praising only India and find fault only with locals for defeats.

It appears Australia has been under tremendous pressure from mafias and state agencies to lose at least the second ODI to great India as a premium for outsmarting India on Sunday and has decided to rest a couple of their cricketers to create a panicky situation in their camp. Not bad, ya...! That would mean, now once again Australia and India would resume their joint cricket exercises as per a pre-fixed plan to let Indians feel great and make themselves humbled by the Indian team. That means, Australia would score a low run rate or let Indians make big score so that Australia would have enough scope to lose the matches. Any guest in India is expe4cted to save the false prestige of India and Australia is being reminded of that by all sources. Indian big guns that also finance the cricket matches are mainly interested in Indian trade in Australia and including educational. Do you still say there wasn't any match-fixing? 

 -----------------------

Dr. Abdul Ruff Colachal

Specialist on State Terrorism

Independent Columnist in International Affairs, Research Scholar (JNU) & the only Indian to have gone through entire India, a fraud and terror nation in South Asia.