Search
 
Write
 
Forums
 
Login
"Let there arise out of you a band of people inviting to all that is good enjoining what is right and forbidding what is wrong; they are the ones to attain felicity".
(surah Al-Imran,ayat-104)
Image Not found for user
User Name: webmaster
Full Name: webmaster
User since: 1/Jan/2007
No Of voices: 154
 
 Views: 1998   
 Replies: 1   
 Share with Friend  
 Post Comment  

The Mullah Military Alliance

Gulmina Bilal

Who is the leader of the opposition in the National Assembly dear readers? Maulana Fazlur Rehman, of course, who is an important, in fact some say a key member of the religious political alliance, the Muttahida Majlis-e-Amal (MMA). Who is vociferously condemning President General Pervez Musharraf and declaring that the U-turn that has been taken by Pakistan after 9/11 needs to be re-examined? The MMA. Who is condemning the army's increased role in political, economic and other affairs? The MMA. Who is declaring that they are the champions of democracy in this age of American imperialism? The MMA.

Who is labelled by President General Musharraf in a television interview as 'rude'? One of the leaders of the MMA and Ameer of Jamaat-e-Islami, Qazi Hussain Ahmed. Who condemns and protests against the establishment of the National Security Council (NSC), terming it as a further institutionalisation of the role of the army in Pakistan's political, social and economic affairs? The MMA. Who refuses to attend the initial meetings of the NSC? MMA leaders, Maulana Fazlur Rehman in his capacity as the Leader of the Opposition in the National Assembly and Akram Khan Durrani in his capacity as Chief Minister NWFP. Who declares that they have the best interests of the poor and the middle class as they represent the middle class? The MMA. Who claims that they will break the shackles of feudalism and will never let the ordinary citizens of this country be exploited? The MMA. Who is an excellent political communicator who succeeds in running with the hare and hunting with the hounds? The MMA.

I had also, of course, like many of you heard that the acronym MMA actually stands for the Military Mullah Alliance. I have also heard drawing room political analysts declare that the political stand-off between the mullahs and the establishment, of which the khakis are an integral part, to be actually an eye-wash. I had, of course, also read this theory being propagated in Hussain Haqqani's book, Pakistan: Between the Military and the Mosque, which by the way is interesting reading. I had also heard people wonder that if the MMA were so against the present order of things, then how could they be in full command in NWFP and in a coalition setting in Balochistan? However, then I also thought that this was juvenile as in real politic you do not give up political space that has been won. So, in a nutshell I am ashamed to admit that I really thought that the mullahs were in opposition. I am ashamed to admit that I was naive enough to believe that the mullahs, because they were mostly from the middle class, would be free from the feudal mindset and greed of acquiring land. I admit that I was foolish. For now I have proof of my foolishness and naïveté.

Chief Minister Akram Khan Durrai is the chief minister who refused to attend the NSC meeting. Chief Minister Akram Khan Durrani is the chief minister who spoke for the poor, the downtrodden and the exploited of this country. Chief Minister Akram Khan Durrani is the chief minister who spoke against corruption and wastage of public resources. Chief Minister Akram Durrani is the chief minister who hails from the MMA and within the MMA the very party of the Leader of Opposition in the National Assembly. However, Chief Minister Akram Khan Durrani is also the chief minister who awarded public land to the armed forces of Pakistan in spite of repeated protests and demonstrations by his own political alliance members.

The honourable chief minister has awarded 160 kanals of land in D. I. Khan to General Headquarters (GHQ) for allotment to defence forces personnel. The allotment order (No 917-18) has been made by the district officer revenue, D. I. Khan, on May 25, 2005 under section 10 (3) of the Colonisation of Government Lands (Punjab) Act, 1912. The land is Mouza Ghass, Khasra No 638 and 639. It is pertinent to mention that the allotment letter does not mention for which purpose this land should be allotted to defence forces personnel by the GHQ.

According to the allotment order, a copy of which I have, 145 kanals and 12 marlas has been allotted to the military and 40 kanals and eight marlas have been awarded to one Syed Monimud din Pirzada. This allotment has been done on June 25, 2005. 160 kanals of public land handed over to the army to add to its already envious land holdings. For this little act of consideration for the needs of the khaki sons of the soil, the MMA members have been awarded some land of their own. A classic case of you scratch my back and I scratch yours. Both parties are even, the deal is closed and the citizens can just go fly a kite for all they care.

Chief Minister Akram Khan Durrani is all for enforcing Islamic values and principles in the province he governs. He is all for eradication of poverty and corruption and to enforce Islam in true letter and spirit. This was the election promise that gave him his present office. But which Islamic values would permit such equal proportion of scratching the back? Chief Minister Durrani and his MMA alliance colleagues want to enforce a Hasba Bill that among other things would ensure that corruption and un-kosher practices are kept strictly in check. However, the question is, is this allotment of land to the GHQ and then allegedly receiving a small portion back for personal use above board? Is the provincial assembly aware of these developments?

Corruption and bribery is prevalent in every society. It is part of human nature and that is why everywhere in the world there are laws to check corruption. Pakistan is no different and we also have bodies like the National Accountability Bureau (NAB) to investigate and check such allegations, at least in theory. I must confess that I have zero problems with the bribes that a traffic constable or a small time clerk is taking. However, these kinds of deals which have kanals of land being transferred, exchanged and allotted very smoothly and without any fear of accountability is scary. For, it is a manifestation of the incestuous elite consensus that we have.

It leaves me with the feeling that all of us are being fooled by their political statements by day while at night when all of us go to bed, the incestuous power elite break out the bottle and giggles at our foolishness. It is scary. I feel almost violated at the thought.

The writer is an electoral reforms and gender mainstreaming consultant based in Islamabad
 Reply:   MQM & MMA and Karachi's Circul
Replied by(Noman) Replied on (7/Nov/2006)
There is no difference between MMA-MQM and Sardar Jam Yousuf's stance regarding the State of Affairs in Baluchistan. Why the hell the MMA is protesting on Bajaur and Wazirstan, they were t

There is no difference between MMA-MQM and Sardar Jam Yousuf's stance regarding the State of Affairs in Baluchistan. Why the hell the MMA is protesting on Bajaur and Wazirstan, they were the ones who signed on 17th Constitutional Amendment/LFO to ease the pain of present Military Regime.
As per the major national Newspapers The opposition suffered a serious setback in the Balochistan assembly on Wednesday when the treasury benches, including MMA legislators, rejected a resolution condemning the killing of Nawab Akbar Bugti and military operation and opposed an adjournment motion seeking a debate on the killing of the JWP leader. However, the Muttahida Majlis Amal succeeded, with the support of the PML and BP-Awami, in getting a resolution condemning the bombing of a seminary in Bajuar passed. The house witnessed pandemonium when resolutions were tabled separately by Jan Mohammad Buledi of the National
Party and Syed Mutiullah Agha, Minister for Information, condemning the killing of Nawab Bugti and others in Dera Bugti and Kohlu and the bombing of Bajuar seminary. Opposition members staged a walkout when most members of the treasury benches, except two female legislators of the MMA, did not support the resolution. While leaving the house, the protesting members accused the MMA of playing double role, condemning the Bajuar incident, but supporting the
military operation against the Baloch people. The speaker allowed the tabling of the MMA resolution condemning the killing of 82 people in the Bajuar seminary and said that only the ministers of the religious alliance had raised their hands.

 
{1}
 
One wonders as to why the MMA and MQM blame the PPP-PML-N i.e. Benazir Bhutto and Mian Nawaz Sharif for making deals the present Military when they [MMA-MQM] themselves have become the representative of 2 % Minority who is ruling the country since 1958
rather the MQM AND MMA are both the Secret Weapons of Establishment particularly from the days of General Ziaul Haq. Similarly the MQM which claims to be the party of downtrodden specifically of the downtrodden of Punjab since October 2002 Election to the extent that yesterday its key Federal Misiter Shamim Akhter in an interview was supporting Kala Bagh Dam provided consensus amongst the provinces. Both MQM and MMA were "˜very' concerned about Sardar Bugti's tragic death and showed "solidarity" with Late Akber Bugti's family but their sympathies only remained to the level of Lip service so much so the MMA Supremo Maualana Fazaul Rehman had even said to GEO television that "Politicians do not usually resign from assemblies merely on the death of a Tribal Chief whereas another Islamo-Fascist of MMA Qazi Hussain Ahmed demanding the resignation from PPP and PML-N leaders.
On August 28, 2006 MQM organizer Dr Farooq Sattar stated ""The MQM is politically caught in a dilemma. It ideologically differs both with the government and the opposition but had to choose one of them." Facing a barrage of questions about the party's responsibility (being a part of the government) in the killing of Nawab Akbar Bugti, he said the MQM condemned it in unequivocal terms. "The MQM is a party limited to urban Sindh as far as electoral politics is concerned. In these circumstances, it can hardly make independent choice in national politics. That is why,
it had to choose between the government and the opposition, and it went for former. But this
partnership does not exclude being ideologically different," he insisted. The party, he said, believed that it could better serve national interest by being part of the government as it could influence official decisions and fight for the rights of downtrodden from within the system. "The party is certain that it could better fight for provincial autonomy and other irritants in national politics by being in the government and that is the only reason for it being part of official set-up."
 
{2}

And if that was not enough the Chief of MQM Altaf Hussain has said that MQM is open to talk with PPP AND PML-N.
 
[3]

Well that's news because from 1988 till 1999 MQM remained part of every government and parted ways rather helped some hidden elements to sabotage every Civilian government's downfall since 1988 and now they are within the Government since 2002 with the same
Hidden Element. One must have no animosity towards MQM provided it gives answers to the following questions:

MQM came into shameful ex istence in 1978-79 [General Zia was ruling the roost] and if you are correct then their site is wrong. However the history tells us something entirely different and i.e. "The earliest political organization of Mohajirs, the All Pakistan Mohajir Student Organization (APMSO) founded in 1978 by Altaf Hussain, evolved into the MQM in 1984. Ethnic and religious divisions in Sindh were exacerbated during the years General Zia-ul Haq was in office (1977 to 1988, of these 1977 to 1985 under martial law) as he used them to suppress and divide emocratic opposition to his rule. Ethnic strife between Mohajir and Sindhis who had initially jointly opposed the influx of Punjabis and Pathans into Sindh, rapidly increased in Karachi and Hyderabad from the mid-1980s.
The MQM, led by Altaf Hussain, meanwhile consolidated its hold on the Mohajir community. In November 1987, the MQM won local body elections in Karachi, Hyderabad and other urban centres in Sindh." "The earliest political organization of Mohajirs, the All Pakistan Mohajir Student Organization (APMSO) founded in 1978 by Altaf Hussain, evolved into the MQM in 1984.
General Zia was ruling the roost and we all know how General Zia used his power to win referendum and how General Zia secretly supported the MQM to ditch Jamat-e-Islami by the way the Local Bodies Election was held under General Zia's government in 1987 and the then Civilian Setup of Ghaus Ali Shah and Muhammad Khan Junejo was a setup of stooges like the present facade of Civilian Setup called Democracy. on the pursuance of the then COAS
Mirza Aslam Baig [check the special issue of Herald 1990 when Ghulam Ishaq Khan dismissed the PPP Government, Mirza Aslam Baig shamelessly admitted that he has taken away the support of 14 MQM MNA's from the PPP to make the government crumble]..
 
[4]

General Zia hanged a Prmie Minister and he was not that fool that he doesnot event know as to what was going on Sindh. When there was a ban on all the political activities then how this MQM came into being? Now if you would allow me to ask some questions. MQM has always been complaining about Police and Rangers Operation Cleanups against the MQM and its workers but what is this? Why they are back and no action not even a vocie of dissent from MQM. I wouldnot write a single line on this i will only quote the news articles. You and others after clicking and reading every link will decide as to where MQM stands.

Legitimizing the extra-judicial killings PAK TRIBUNE REPORT Tuesday November 01, 2005 (1208 PST)

http://www.paktribune.com/news/index.php?id=124234

Families of missing Muttahida men assured of help
By Our Reporter

http://www.dawn.com/2004/11/01/nat8.htm

MQM and the Curse of Middle Class Leadership wants two Illegally Encroached Islands near Karachi Beach wants to be developed as Job Providers [while uprooting the Poor Fishermen "the infamous 98% which MQM Claim to represent] to jobless, MQM Federal Minister for Ports and Shipping, Senator Babar Khan Ghauri announced in Islamabad that the Federal Government has issued a licence for a ferry service linking Mumbai, Karachi and Dubai, MQM city govt plans skyline along coast and what not Whereas those cities of Sindh particularly Karachi and Hyderabad which are being ruled by MQM are depicting the picture of as if Nuclear Bombs have hit those two cities. The main problem of Karachi is Transport and MQM despite having important ministries in Sindh and Islamabad and they do not even want to talk about the revival of Circular Railway for Karachi which can solve the problem of Traffic Jam and save fuel and of course help ease the suffering of those 98 % which MQM claims to represent. That is why we are bound to say that MQM is basically a "CURSE OF MIDDLE CLASS LEADERSHIP".


KARACHI: No headway in KCR revival plan.
KARACHI, Nov 2: Despite the approval of the
feasibility of Karachi Circular Railway (KCR) revival project by the Sindh government about six weeks back, no headway has been made in this direction so far, due to the same old traditional attitude of our bureaucracy towards the solution of the problems of the masses. On September 16, Sindh Transport Minister Adil Siddiqui announced that the Sindh government had formally approved the feasibility of revival of the KCR and would be submitted to the federal government
within a week, so that a sift loan could be obtained from the Japanese government for the same. According to details, the project will be completed in three phases and its reach will be extended to Surjani, North Karachi, Airport, Gizri, Defence, Port Qasim and other areas. In the first phase, the KCR will be revived from the Karachi City to Nazimabad, in the second phase from Nazimabad to Drigh Road, and in the third phase it will be extended to airport and other
areas. The entire system of the KCR will be computerised and a separate track will be laid from
Karachi City to Drigh Road, and all railway lines, signals and stations with commercial centres will be developed on modern lines for the KCR. However, despite passage of six weeks there seemed no visible development and it seemed that the bureaucracy has yet to realize the importance of this plan, which could alleviate sufferings of the Karachiites and bring the city into the fold of mega urban cities with an efficient means of public transport.

The Pakistan Railways had started the KCR in 1969 and closed it down in 1999 on the pretext of losses. It is worth noting that the KCR had earned half a million rupees in the first year alone, when it used to charge mere 0.25 paisas per ticket. In 1970s, the KCR used to run as many as 104 trips daily. Logically, the KCR which bagged half a million rupees during its first year of operations had to economically thrive with the passage of time due to increased population of the city, but instead it incurred losses and was ultimately closed. Due to the hue and cry of the
Karachiites, the government decided to revive it in 2004 and its first phase between Landhi and Wazir Mansion stations was revived in 2005. But again the nexus of transporters and bureaucracy managed to block work on its second phase. Despite tall claims by the high-ups of federal, provincial and city governments regarding the early revival of the KCR, no one is
coming forward with a solid plan and a specific time schedule for this vital plan. Recently, Minister of State for Railways Ali Asjad Malhi was quoted as saying that the circular railway service would be launched in eight cities including Karachi and Lahore.
Responding to a question during question hour on the floor of assembly he said that in the first phase, feasibility of Karachi station to Dhabeji station and Karachi City to Malir Cantonment had been completed.
He said that a plan was being worked out for launching Karachi Urban Transport Corporation and laying down a two-way railway track for KCR was under consideration.
Interestingly, a year back in November 2005 this matter was discussed between Sindh Chief Minister Dr Arbab Ghulam Rahim and State Minister for Railways Ishaque Khan Khakwani during their meeting at the CM House Karachi and it was decided to set up a corporation named Karachi Urban Transport Corporation for running the KCR to facilitate Karachi commuters;
however, despite the passage of an entire year nobody is aware of the progress made in this regard. However, City Nazim Syed Mustafa Kamal, in the second week of May 2006, visited Islamabad and called on Federal Railways Minister Shaikh Rasheed Ahmed to discuss the
revival of KCR. After the meeting a press release was issued by the city government, which said that the federal government had agreed to completely revive the KCR, besides implementation of the mass transit programme. It claimed that the railway minister completely agreed to the proposal of KCR revival and assured that the federal government and especially Railways Ministry would provide all-out assistance in this regard.

It might be recalled that a team of technical experts of Japan last year completed initial feasibility report for the KCR revival and submitted it to the Sindh governor. However, according to the reports, this feasibility report was not approved as it suggested a long period for the revival work. The KCR system encircles major parts of the city. It runs parallel to the main business area of Sharea Faisal.
It touches I. I. Chundrigar Road, which is less than one kilometer from Kharadar, half a kilometer from the Fish Harbor, and one kilometer and a half from Lea Market. In the past it catered to the needs of the densely populated residential areas including Masoom Colony, Chanesar Goth, Sindhi Muslim Society, PECHS, Mohammad Ali Society, KDA Scheme 1, Baloch Colony, Mehmoodabad, Karsaz, Shah Faisal Colony, Drigh Colony, Quaidabad, Malir Colony, Landhi, Gulshan-i-Iqbal, Federal 'B' Area, Karimabad, Nazimabad, Paposhnagar and Sher Shah. It is said that some foreign firms are interested in running the KCR. There are also talks about getting foreign loans for this project. But in fact the Pakistan Railways (PR) is competent enough to
complete this plan from local funding. The Karachi commuters demand a solid, concrete plan for the revival of KCR with a specific deadline. They hope that the federal government would approve the feasibility of KCR soon and order physical launching of this much-awaited urban transport plan."”PPI

http://www.dawn.com/2006/11/03/local6.htm


Mansoor Hallaj
 

References:

Opposition suffers setback in PA: Move condemning
killing of Nawab Bugti rejected By Amanullah Kasi {1}

http://www.dawn.com/2006/11/02/nat1.htm

Farooq explains MQM "˜dilemma' By Our Staff Reporter
{2}

http://www.dawn.com/2006/08/29/nat8.htm

MQM open to talks with PPP, PML-N' By Shamim-ur-Rehman
{3}

http://www.dawn.com/2006/10/23/top3.htm

PAKISTAN Human rights crisis in Karachi {4}

SUMMARY FEBRUARY 1996 AI INDEX: ASA 33/01/96 DISTR:
SC/CO

http://web.amnesty.org/library/Index/ENGASA330011996?open&of=ENG-PAK

 
Please send your suggestion/submission to webmaster@makePakistanBetter.com
Long Live Islam and Pakistan
Site is best viewed at 1280*800 resolution