Why Indo-Pak Composite Dialogue is Decomposed?

-By Dr. Abdul Ruff Colachal

*****

I

India keeps insulting Pakistan while Islamabad takes Indian snubs lying as low as possible, although both keep meeting in dialogues and on sidelines of regional summits. The fact that Pakistan does not stop mentioning about Kashmir is a cause of New Delhi's owes. The wars they waged have not made India to consider sovereignty issue of defenseless Kashmiris - now under Indian brute control with the tacit approval of anti-Islamic nations. Hardly a week passes by without the Indian terror forces killing a Kashmiri or raping a woman there, officially. The terror wars in Islamic world unleashed by the USA and allies have given extra strength to India to pursue the anti-Kashmiri policy. The crucial problem facing the world today is the dichotomy between words and deeds perpetuated especially by all big powers for advancing their narrow national interests against the weak countries. As a result, many state terror states like India and Israel unleash genocides steadily over their neighbors, making regional peace a mere mirage.

Even while championing the cause of secularism and democracy by killing innocent Muslims in and around, India felt nervous and ashamed of the fact world has recognized India as one of the influential terror states around. New Delhi bosses and strategists hate Pakistan more for the way it internationalized Kashmir issue and exposed Indian false claims over Jammu Kashmir. In order to counter act, Indian launched ploys of terrorism and cross border terrorism and maligned the Islamic state of harboring terrorism against an innocent Hindu state which has unleashed terror attacks on Kashmiris and destroyed mosques on its bogus economic and military strength.

Kashmiris look forward to obtaining back sovereignty snatched away by terror India in 1947, while Indo-Pak leaders keep talking about lasting peace without any substance both on the sidelines of big events or directly either in Islamabad or New Delhi aided by strategists and solemnized by heavy dinners of their choice. Any move from Indian side can only be possible if the UNSC shows the right path to India and ask the m to renounce terror path to silence the freedom seeking Kashmiris. The bottle neck is Indian stubbornness and arrogance and Pakistani mildness and cowardice. India employs the terrorism" ploy to scuttle the peace process and all "meets" end up disastrously. But nothing tangible has come out of these bull talks.

  II

Once again in July Pakistani premier Yusuf Raza Gilani met his Indian counterpart Manmohan in Egypt the third such high-level meeting since last year's Mumbai Nov26 attacks derailed any rapprochement, perhaps for fun sake so that the photographers and columnists make some quick cash. Even as a naughty terror India keeps it military feet in alien Jammu Kashmir, the Pakistani premier has called for purposeful dialogue on the contentious issue while addressing NAN third world leaders in Egypt. Meanwhile, talks go on to "do some homework" in reducing tensions between the two nuclearized states in a meeting on the fringes ahead of regional meets. Other SA neighbors are annoyed that their "democratic" India steals water from their resources and illegally blocks river flows into their territories, but India remains undisturbed by external criticisms and goes on doing the same immoral operations. 

Recently, the resumption of talks to determine how to move forward again began as Indian big boss, Manmohan Singh, as usual, warned against a "terrorist" Pakistan, President Asif Zardari, on the sidelines of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) moot in Yekaterinburg, Russia in June, literally snubbing a sovereign nation in public by directing Pakistan to "do more" to contain terrorism. India always does this systematically and Pakistan takes it coolly as if it is fate of Pakistanis. Pakistani President Zardari was "very happy to meet" Indian premier at SCO as the first meeting between the two leaders since the Mumbai Nov26 which India has jokingly, as usual, blamed on elements operating in Pakistan. Indian media and strategist hawks are keen any Indo-Pak meeting does to show to world a "softening" of India's stance, because India is a big boss around. The Zardari-Singh meeting resumption, thus, air at back Indian home not as a sub-continental dialogue, but as a sign of the Indian government's weakness, Indian strategist oppose any peace.

India abets terrorism in Jammu Kashmir killing innocent Kashmiris. Jammu Kashmir remains the core issue of tensions between the nuclear neighbors. Not only Indian leaders including the current premier Singh are avoiding punishment for the Indian terror genocides in Jammu Kashmir with Israeli weapons, India also avoids facing remerging new reality by according sovereignty back to Kashmiris, either voluntarily or by international pressure, Pakistan is keen to revive the five-year-old "composite dialogue" covering all disputes between the two countries. But India harps on "terrorism" to scuttle the peace process and Singh has insisted it must first show it is serious about taking action against LeT, as well as against other militant groups that launch attacks in the Indian part of the disputed Kashmir region and elsewhere in the country. The USA is keenly interested in resumption of talks between the two countries to ease tensions on Pakistan's eastern border with India, so it can focus on fighting Taliban militants on its western border with Afghanistan.

India continues to bully Pakistan under Indo-US nuclearism rules. It started with Manmohan Singh telling Zardari upfront that India expected Pakistan not to allow its territory to be used for terror attacks against it. Singh put Pakistan to the 'terrorism test' and said he had agreed to give Islamabad "some time" to take action against anti-India terror outfits before the two leaders meet again in Egypt mid-July. Manmohan Singh said he told the president to show the same "sincerity and determination" in dealing with anti-India terror as Islamabad has shown in dealing with the Al Maida and the Taliban. The decision to depute the foreign secretaries to discuss terrorism was taken at the Yekaterinburg ice-breaker meeting.

III

Mumbai and Lahore terrors reveal, India unleashes terror activities around and put the blame on Pakistan. The SCO was used by an observer India as a forum to divert the global attention on Indian immoral polls and to make the world believe that Indians did not do any thing in Mumbai come closer to both China and Central Asian nations, while cementing ties with Russia. Indian gimmicks do play some role globally thanks to anti-Islamic media. It was an attempt to hide Indian terrorist infrastructures and to mobilize the support of the international community against "terrorism" from Pakistan amid a growing perception that the western powers were losing interest after expressing outrage over the Mumbai carnage seven months ago.

Clearly, anti-Islamic fascist tendencies from US-led NATO, Israel and India are in full action in Islamic world. Both Russia and China have also displayed their "displeasure" with Muslims in their territories. Russia has joined the anti-Islamic fascist forces in Afghanistan. CIA-Pentagon-Mossad-SIS-RAW led by US-Pentagon is interested only in terrorizing the global Muslims by enacting different terror dramas ably coordinated through murders. The military terror exercises in Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan confirm this. America is keen to bring in Indo-Pak dimension to kill Muslims in Afghanistan and Pakistan.

The US has finally come out with its agenda in the region- GST (global state terrorism) killing Pakistanis and Afghans with drones from Israel. On June 26 Washington said it will support continuing dialogue between India and Pakistan them to find joint solutions to counter terrorism and to promote regional stability, but leave it to them how to go about it. The timing, scope, and content of any such dialogue are strictly matters for Pakistani and Indian leaders to decide. Referring to the June 16 meeting between Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and Pakistan President Asif Ali Zardari at the SCO summit, America feels such high-level engagement in the aftermath of the Mumbai terrorist attacks is "encouraging".  

IV

The vague feel good factor seen in the company of USA provokes poor Indian leaders poke their long nose into Pakistani affairs. Terrorism is being promoted by New Delhi to evade any effective resolution of the strangled issue. While Pakistan seeks peace, India thwarts all attempts to reach agreements for regional peace; because it does not want to lose the stolen property called Jammu Kashmir seeks US support on payment basis in terms of terror military purchases.

Right from the days of Nehru, Indians have meticulously used every international forum to snub Pakistani leaders, the beginner of Nehru Dynasty. Now, midtongued, self-centred Indian premier Singh has been used by extremist strategists to say something "strongly" to Pakistan leader. The "soft" spoken "innocent" Singh has exhibited his special skills to scold Pakistan in the usual Indian format using "not enough" terrorism plank. He has not stopped genocide of Kashmiris or raps of females in the militarized valley and one does not know if he would tolerate the same is done to Sikhs also. If so, or not, Singh also should tried for genocides of Kashmiri and Gujarati Muslims.

The crux of the matter is India never desires any peace and every rhetoric and action from New Delhi's "giants" gives rise to apprehensions about India's seriousness about bringing peace to the South Asian region. Indian strategists don't want peace by surrendering sovereignty to the struggling Kashmiris nor does it want to slash resources year marked for the military readiness for terror activities. In reducing defense expenditures, Indian civil leaders would be facing wrath from the military bosses and the petrified commission agents who thrive on defense deals of the civil masters by sharing the booty with politicians, bureaucrats and other "concerned" personnel and persons. The issue of UK discovered NRI Hindu god Amarnath structure in Kashmir is being popped by India to complicate the problem further.

According to Indian sources, when the military establishment realized that the Kashmiris wanted freedom from both India and Pakistan, Musharraf a Delhiite banned the jihadi organizations and closed their training camps. Now there are only pro-Islamic Shari'a defenders there. In 2004 Musharraf opted for the composite dialogue and backed it by robust back channel diplomacy. Musharraf ended up only by appeasing Hindu Indians. India purposefully, and successfully, failed all his efforts. Today in the name of fighting terrorists, Indo-Pak-USA terrorists kill only the Pakistani Muslims. India, as a key resolve of Nehru India, wants to raise Hindu population to equal all other religions and out number global Muslims. President Zardari is following the footsteps of his predecessor in chair. Now the NATO is supporting the Indian agenda with Pakistani help. If Pakistan wants to pursue the path of self-destruction, none can rescue it, and since it does not have enough faith in the Almighty and His Sharia, one can only wish Allah will not give away this Islamic state. 

To understand any new initiative, some background is necessary. India illegally occupies Jammu Kashmir since 1947 after it got independence form the British Empire by pumping in terror forces to the region equipped with lethal weapons and flushing out Kashmiri Muslims in the form of dead bodies. After wars, the Indo- Pak deadlock was broken in 1997 when India under IK Gujral regime accepted that Kashmir was a "dispute" and Pakistan under Nawaz Sharif agreed to a "composite" dialogue on all issues. Despite nuclear rattling in 1998, Sharif and Vajpayee reiterated the composite dialogue in Lahore in 1999. But then, after he seized power, President General Musharraf repudiated the composite dialogue as a "sell- out" by Sharif. In 2001 the Agra talks collapsed because India blocked any progress by playing marvelously the phrase "cross-border-terrorism" and insisted on posing "terrorist infiltration" from Pakistan as a core issue like Kashmir. Kargil war in 1999, provoked by Indian forces stationed there, brought the two countries to the brink of war. As a strategic American ally after Sept11, 2001 focusing on the border with Afghanistan, General Musharraf avoided conflict with India by announcing in 2002 that Pakistan would not allow any "terrorist infiltration" across the LoC or border into India. Many Pakistanis want Kashmir a part of Pakistan.

V

Peace and cooperation between these two South Asian nuclearized nations can guarantee not just prosperity on both sides of the international frontiers, but stability and development in the region. Peace is both an ideal proposition and also a long-term realism, but terror India never seems to seek peace with Pakistan for fear of losing out Jammu Kashmir for ever. That is how Pakistan's sincere desire to bring peace in the region and have friendly relations with India has always failed. But Indian media known for global mischief and regional fanaticism quickly find fault with Islamabad religiously and global media reproduces some of their post-paid "analyses".  Indian media admit that both India and Pak have done enough harm to each other, but they don't wish peace process well. That is Indian petrified position.

Among the NAN members, it is India that managed maximum benefits out of the cold war between two sets of ideologies by garnering mostly for industrialization and nuclearism, while at the same time, also got benefits form the USA by using lobbyists and pro-US agents in and outside India. NAN is no more Non Aligned nations, but just only the Nations Against Nations and most of nations seek favors from every big power. India now leads NAN as, and as a terror state cannot lead the developing nations now. It wants UNSC membership to lord over the world and offer counsel to USA and Russia as to how to "do enough" and "deliver" on counsels.  

Except UNSC membership, India got most of the favors even from the West almost free. UK represents Indian interests in UNSC. India still enjoys big bossism in the region and beyond wants the UNSC to take note of its power. USA, however, restricted India from capitalizing on the "cold" rift, lest India would have become a super power by now threatening both USA and Russia on the one hand and China and Pakistan on the other. The expectations of India are to totally subordinate its neighbors to Indian dictates and in pursuance of Indian goals in their respective country, as India is doing for the USA and UK.

USA also talks about peace but is doing not enough on the issue. For USA, which is focused on killing of Afghans and Pakistanis alongside the Iraqis, Kashmir and Indo-Pak relations are a low priority which in international political science means no priority. What Washington seeks is genocides of Muslims and destructions of their properties. However, Robert O. Blake, Assistant Secretary of State for South and Central Asia India and Pakistan face common challenges said 'We will also continue to support dialogue between Indian and Pakistani leaders, and we will support continuing dialogue to find joint solutions to "counter terrorism" and to promote regional stability. In the name of terrorism, the GST rogues kill Muslims in a sustained manner, while the entire Islamic world is busy making extra wealth and kicking the poor.

Global state terrorism led by the USA has enabled regional terror India to ignore international cries over Indian tyranny in Kashmir. Never willing to keep its word, like Israel, India always believes in secret tracks in democracy and state terrorism. India and Pakistan have agreed for the ninth time to start talking again secretly. While Indian goal in the composite dialogue is to keep the Kashmir issue at bay for ever by creating terrorism at the crucial moments to stall the peace process, it is not evidently clear the mindset of Pakistani establishment, though people of Pakistan, like Kashmiris believe Pakistan is pursing Kashmir sovereignty cause with full dedication and sincerity. Is it wrong on their part to think that way?

The key problem with peace process is India considers Mrs. Clinton as part of its paid lobby in Washington streets. As usual, USA got what wants in India with lucrative deals in tools of mass murders (TMM). Mrs. Clinton seems to have done enough in India signing multi-billion dollar terror deals, apart from blasting Pakistan, a close terror ally, and praising "democracy" the "big cash lords" in India, an aspiring cash rich strategic partner. Any improvement in Indo-Pak relations would be possible only when both hands come together to clap, lest only Indian noise-cum-nuisance is heard every where. This Indian anomaly of over-acting has to be arrested first.   India efficiently engineered terror activities and blasts all round India and simply pass on the blame on Pakistan so that no peace could be possible and Jammu Kashmir could be a part of India for ever and for this it seeks a berth in discredited terror sponsoring UNSC. The ball is still lying in Indian courts - whether Indian leaders decide to kick it properly for SA regional peace or still want to play the usual mischief by blame games, remains to be seen. Indian leaders should rein in essentially anti-Muslim media for peace in the region.     

-----------------------

Dr. Abdul Ruff Colachal

Independent Researcher in International Affairs, The only Indian to have gone through entire India, a fraud and terror nation in South Asia.